14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3. AFM images of 14.51 nm Fe3O4 MNP (A) and 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNP (B) modified SPR gold substrate. The concentration of Fe3O4<br />

MNPs is 1.6 nM, and the assembly time is 10 min.<br />

coverage of Fe3O4 MNPs on SPR gold film could be reached<br />

at a higher concentration due to the rapid diffusion adsorption.<br />

It should be pointed out that the SPR angle shift resulting from<br />

the adsorption of Fe3O4 MNPs is much higher than that of the<br />

value resulting from the adsorption of most biomolecules under<br />

the same concentration. 40,41 It means Fe3O4 MNPs greatly<br />

enhance the signal of SPR spectroscopy. Importantly, the SPR<br />

angle shift could be further increased when 32.82 nm Fe3O4<br />

MNPs are used. Figure 2B shows the SPR angle shift curves<br />

resulting from the adsorption of 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs with the<br />

same concentration sequence as 14.51 nm Fe3O4 MNPs. With<br />

the increase of Fe3O4 MNP concentrations from 0.016 to 1.6<br />

nM, the SPR angle shifts increase from 79.22 to 2479.79 m°.<br />

To further understand the size effect of Fe3O4 MNPs on the<br />

SPR response, the relation between SPR angle shifts and the<br />

concentrations of Fe3O4 MNPs with the two sizes are compared<br />

in Figure 2C. Obviously, much larger angle shifts are observed<br />

for 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs because of its larger moleculer<br />

weight. Besides that, the affinity constants and surface coverage<br />

for both kinds of Fe3O4 MNPs could also be obtained from<br />

Figure 2C. From the data of Figure 2C, we can see that the<br />

plasmon resonance shifts with the increasing Fe3O4 MNP<br />

concentration and a simple Langmuir isotherm 42 could be used<br />

to fit the data. The Langmuir equation used to fit the data is<br />

given by<br />

KA [C] Fe3O4 ∆λ ) ∆λmax1 + KA [C] Fe3O4 Where ∆λ is the angle shift caused by the adsorption of Fe3O4<br />

MNPs, ∆λmax is the angle shift which will be observed at<br />

saturation, KA is the apparent equilibrium affinity constant, and<br />

[C]Fe3O4 is the concentration of Fe3O4 MNPs. Using the above<br />

equation, KA values for 14.51 and 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs are<br />

(40) Mullett, W. M.; Lai, E. P. C.; Yeung, J. M. Methods 2000, 22, 77–91.<br />

(41) Hoa, X. D.; Kirk, A. G.; Tabrizian, M. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2007, 23, 151–<br />

160.<br />

(42) Lee, H. J.; Wark, A. W.; Corn, R. M. Langmuir 2006, 22, 5241–5250.<br />

6786 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

(1)<br />

calculated to be around 7.14 × 10 8 and 2.63 × 10 9 M -1 ,<br />

respectively, which are similar to the value of NPs as found in<br />

literature. 43 The saturation responses ∆λmax of 14.51 and 32.82<br />

nm are calculated to be 2165 and 3134 0 m, respectively. It can<br />

be seen that 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs have slightly higher affinity<br />

for adsorption on the sensing surface due to their larger<br />

molecular weight; therefore, they show larger angle shifts as<br />

well as higher saturation response (∆λmax) compared to 14.51<br />

nm Fe3O4 MNPs. In our following experiments, we, therefore,<br />

use 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs. The ratio (∆λ)/(∆λmax) gives the<br />

fraction of surface coverage, and if the bulk concentration of<br />

[C]Fe3O4 is equal to (1)/(KA), half of the surface sites will be<br />

occupied ((∆λ)/(∆λmax) ) 0.5). On the basis of the experimental<br />

results and the fitting parameters, we calculate that 80%<br />

of the coverage ((∆λ)/(∆λmax) ) 0.8) will be obtained when<br />

32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs with a concentration of 1.6 nM are used.<br />

This concentration will be used in our following experiments<br />

because the changes in SPR angle shift (∆λ) will be very small<br />

even if we further increase the concentration of Fe3O4 MNPs.<br />

To demonstrate that a dense monolayer of MNPs could be<br />

formed on a SPR substrate within 10 min using a 1.6 nM Fe3O4<br />

MNP solution as assembly solution, AFM is used to evaluate<br />

the surface morphology of MNP modified SPR gold substrate.<br />

Figure 3A,B shows the AFM images of 14.51 nm Fe3O4 MNPs<br />

and 32.82 nm Fe3O4 MNPs on SPR gold substrate, respectively.<br />

As seen from the AFM figures, the nanoislands are formed<br />

after MNPs are assembled. The diameter of nanoislands in<br />

Figure 3A is smaller than that of the value in Figure 3B due to<br />

different diameter of MNPs. However, the dense layer of MNPs<br />

on SPR gold substrate has been observed from Figure 3 for both<br />

kinds of Fe3O4 MNPs at the present experimental condition,<br />

which indicates the adsorption of Fe3O4 MNPs on SPR gold<br />

substrate is fast and the present experimental condition is<br />

suitable for further experiments.<br />

(43) Liao, W. S.; Chen, X.; Yang, T. L.; Castellana, E. T.; Chen, J. X.; Cremer,<br />

P. S. Biointerphases 2009, 4, 80–85.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!