14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 3. Performance of the developed ELISA on different solid<br />

support matrixes. Three categories of the solid support were chosen<br />

on the basis of their chemical properties, namely polystyrene (PS)<br />

which is hydrophobic (white circles); polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA),<br />

a hydrophilic polymer (black circles); and polycyclo-olefin polymer,<br />

trade name Zeonex, which is a neutral matrix (inverted black<br />

triangles). The error bars represent standard deviations.<br />

may be a factor in their reduced sensitivities. 14 The sensitivity<br />

and specificity of any immunoassay is dependent on the antigen<br />

capture efficiency of an antibody which is subsequently governed<br />

by the nature of antibody 15,16 and accounts for the different assay<br />

sensitivities of the commercially available kits employing different<br />

type of antibodies that are monoclonal or polyclonal at the capture<br />

stage in ELISA.<br />

Three different types of commercially relevant substrates,<br />

polystyrene (PS) (hydrophobic), polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA)<br />

(hydrophilic), and cyclo-olefin polymer (Zeonex) (inert), were<br />

used in the modified microtiter plate format. The HFA assay was<br />

performed on these matrixes in the modified microtiter plate<br />

format. The HFA assays performed on different solid substrates<br />

could not be directly compared because of their different thick-<br />

(14) Wild, D. The Immunoassay Handbook, 3rd ed.; Elsevier: Oxford, 2005.<br />

(15) Lacy, A.; Dunne, L.; Fitzpatrick, B.; Daly, S.; Keating, G.; Baxter, A.; Hearty,<br />

S.; O’Kennedy, R. J. AOAC Int. 2006, 89 (3), 884–892.<br />

(16) Byrne, B.; Stack, E.; Gilmartin, N.; O’Kennedy, R. Sensors 2009, 9, 4407–<br />

4445.<br />

7052 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

nesses. Theoretically, the optical path length contributes toward<br />

the absorbance (A). Therefore, a thick solid support increases<br />

the path length and, hence, significantly changes the absorbance.<br />

However, the generic nature of the developed ELISA procedure<br />

was successfully demonstrated (Figure 3). The HFA assay<br />

performed on the Zeonex support, which is an inert cyclic poly<br />

olefin derivative, had an analytical sensitivity of 19.5 pg/mL, while<br />

for the assay performed on PS and PMMA, it was 78 pg/mL. The<br />

analytical sensitivities for the HFA assay and the dose-response,<br />

which determines the slope-dependent linearity range of the assay,<br />

of HFA-anti-HFA for all the three solid supports used in this study<br />

suggests that this modified protocol increases the overall assay<br />

sensitivity and is not confined to the nature of the solid support<br />

used for capturing antibody.<br />

CONCLUSIONS<br />

A rapid sandwich ELISA procedure was developed for the<br />

highly sensitive detection of HFA/AHSG. It was based on the<br />

covalent immobilization of anti-HFA capture antibody on a<br />

3-APTES-functionalized microtiter plate. The developed ELISA has<br />

comparatively better analytical sensitivity (39 pg/mL) and less<br />

variability in interday and intraday assay repeats than the<br />

conventional format, which has an analytical sensitivity of 624 pg/<br />

mL. The surface chemistry developed for this study is generic<br />

and can be employed to activate polymer matrixes irrespective of<br />

their chemical nature as demonstrated on PS (hydrophobic),<br />

PMMA (hydrophilic), and polycyclo-olefin (inert). Therefore, this<br />

strategy can also be used for rapid assay development on various<br />

commercially relevant substrates and the screening of substrates<br />

for particular biosensor/diagnostic applications.<br />

ACKNOWLEDGMENT<br />

C.K.D. and S.K.V. contributed equally to this work. We<br />

acknowledge Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Syracuse, USA, and<br />

Industrial Development Agency, Ireland, for the financial support<br />

under the CBAS Project Code 116294.<br />

SUPPORTING INFORMATION AVAILABLE<br />

Additional information as noted in text. This material is<br />

available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.<br />

Received for review May 21, 2010. Accepted July 7, 2010.<br />

AC101339Q

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!