in addition to their lengthy procedures. 13 Biosensors based on fluorescent (FL) materials have attracted much attention due to their sensitivity, selectivity, and rapidity. Organic molecules and organometallic complexes have been developed for protein assays. 14,15 Upon complexation or conjugation with proteins, the luminophores show emission enhancements and/or spectral shifts, which enable the biopolymers to be detected and quantified. Some of the FL probes, however, are insoluble in aqueous media, while others are unstable under ambient conditions. 16 Some luminophores show spectacular performances in protein assays but are extremely expensive because of their painstaking syntheses. 14,15 These drawbacks greatly limit the scope of their real-life high-tech applications. This calls for the development of synthetically readily accessible and environmentally stable bioprobes with high sensitivity and selectivity. A thorny problem associated with the emissions of conventional luminophores in aqueous medium or physiological buffer is aggregation-caused quenching (ACQ). 17 The luminophores are in close vicinity in the aggregates suspended in the aqueous buffer, which favors the formation of such detrimental species as excimers and exciplexes and causes nonradiative relaxations of the excited states. We have recently discovered that tetraphenylethene (TPE) behaves in a way exactly opposite to the ACQ dyes: it is nonemissive in the solution state but becomes highly luminescent in the aggregate state. 18 We coined “aggregationinduced emission” (AIE) for the phenomenon because the nonemissive TPE is induced to emit by aggregate formation. Decorating TPE with ionic or polar functional groups yields watersoluble derivatives, which can be utilized as FL probes for bioanalyses. 19,20 Our and other research groups have successfully used the TPE-based AIE luminogens for nucleic acid detection, enzymatic activity assay, and metallic ion tracing. 21,22 The successes prompted us to further explore their potentials in bioanaly- (11) Bradford, M. M. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248. (12) Lowry, O. H.; Rosebrough, N. J.; Farr, A. L.; Randall, R. J. J. Biol. Chem. 1951, 193, 265. (13) Haugland, R. P. Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research <strong>Chemical</strong>s; Molecular Probe: Leiden, 2002, p. 420. (14) (a) Giepmans, B. N. G.; Adams, S. R.; Ellisman, M. H.; Tsien, R. Y. Science 2006, 312, 217. (b) Royer, C. A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1769. (c) Suzuki, Y.; Yokoyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17799. (d) Matulis, D.; Baumann, C. G.; Bloomfield, V. A.; Lovrien, R. E. Biopolymers 1999, 49, 451. (e) Yarmoluk, S. M.; Kryvorotenko, D. V.; Balanda, A. O.; Losytskyy, M. Y.; Kovalska, V. B. Dyes Pigm. 2001, 51, 41. (f) Hawe, A.; Sutter, M.; Jiskoot, W. Pharm. Res. 2008, 25, 1487. (15) (a) Eryazici, I.; Moorefield, C. N.; Newkome, G. R. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 1834. (b) Keefe, M. H.; Benkstein, K. D.; Hupp, J. T. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2000, 205, 201. (16) (a) Matulis, D.; Lovrien, R. Biophys. J. 1998, 74, 422. (b) Davis, D. M.; Birch, D. J. S. J. Fluoresc. 1996, 6, 23. (17) Birks, J. B. Photophysics of Aromatic Molecules; Wiley: London, 1970. (18) Hong, Y.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Commun. 2009, 4332. (19) Li, Z.; Dong, Y. Q.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Sun, J.; Qin, A.; Haussler, M.; Dong, Y. P.; Sung, H. H. Y.; Williams, I. D.; Kwok, H. S.; Tang, B. Z. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 905. (20) (a) Yuan, C. X.; Tao, X. T.; Wang, L.; Yang, J. X.; Jiang, M. H. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 6809. (b) Zhao, M.; Wang, M.; Liu, H.; Liu, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, D. Langmuir 2009, 25, 676. (c) Wang, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.; Zhu, D. Chem. Commun. 2008, 4469. (d) Suzuki, Y.; Yokoyama, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 17799. (21) (a) Tong, H.; Hong, Y.; Dong, Y.; Haussler, M.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Li, Z.; Guo, Z.; Guo, Z.; Tang, B. Z. Chem. Commun. 2006, 3705. (b) Tong, H.; Hong, Y.; Dong, Y.; Haussler, M.; Li, Z.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Dong, Y.; Sung, H. H. Y.; Williams, I. D.; Tang, B. Z. J. Phys. Chem. B 2007, 111, 11817. (c) Hong, Y.; Haussler, M.; Lam, J. W. Y.; Li, Z.; Sin, K. K.; Dong, Y.; Tong, H.; Liu, J.; Qin, A.; Renneberg, R.; Tang, B. Z. Chem.sEur. J. 2008, 14, 6428. 7036 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010 Chart 1. <strong>Chemical</strong> Structure of Water-Soluble AIE Luminogen of BSPOTPE ses. In this work, we examined the utility of a TPE salt, sodium 1,2-bis[4-(3-sulfonatopropoxyl)phenyl]-1,2-diphenylethene(BSPOTPE; Chart 1), as a bioprobe for HSA detection and quantitation. The FL “turn-on” attribute of BSPOTPE by its complexation with albumin facilitated the quantitative assay and visual observation of HSA in the aqueous buffer and gel electrophoresis, respectively. It is well-known that proper biological functions of proteins are associated with their specific strand conformations and folding structures. 23 Understanding of protein folding is of fundamental importance for proteomic and pharmaceutical research. 24 HSA is a polypeptide chain with three R-helical domains (I-III), which are further divided into two subdomains (A and B). 1,25 Its crystal structure shows that the main ligand-binding sites in the albumin are located in the hydrophobic cavities of subdomains IIA and IIIA, which are sometimes referred to as Sudlow sites I and II, respectively. 26 Conformation analyses of the hydrophobic cavities play an important role in drug development, especially pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic investigations. 27 Study of conformation transitions of proteins in the presence of denaturants is a topic of great interest because it can offer mechanistic insights into folding and unfolding processes of the biopolymers. 28,29 Though intermediate states have been suspected to be involved in the unfolding and refolding processes of many proteins, they are often not detected due to the lack of appropriate probes. 29 Characterization of the intermediate states becomes even more complex in the multidomain proteins, such as HSA, in which each domain is capable of unfolding and refolding independently. 30 Whether intermediate states are involved in the unfolding pathway of HSA has been an issue of debate. In this study, we made use of the AIE feature of BSPOTPE and investigated the unfolding process of HSA. A stable molten-globule intermediate was observed in its unfolding process induced by guanidine hydrochloride (GndHCl), a well-known denaturant. Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) study proved the accessibility of HSA by BSPOTPE and suggested probable location of the FL bioprobe in the hydrophobic cavity in the protein folding structure. Combination of the FL technique with circular dichroism (CD), (22) (a) Wang, M.; Gu, X.; Zhang, G.; Zhang, D.; Zhu, D. Anal. Chem. 2009, 81, 4444. (b) Wang, M.; Zhang, D.; Zhang, G.; Tang, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhu, D. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 6443. (23) Flora, K.; Brennan, J. D.; Baker, G. A.; Doody, M. A.; Bright, F. V. Biophys. J. 1998, 75, 1084. (24) Jusko, W. J.; Gretch, M. Drug Metab. Rev. 1976, 5, 43. (25) He, X. M.; Carter, D. C. Nature 1992, 358, 209. (26) (a) Sudlow, G.; Birkett, D. J.; Wade, D. N. Mol. Pharmacol. 1975, 11, 824. (b) Sudlow, G.; Birkett, D. J.; Wade, D. N. Mol. Pharmacol. 1976, 12, 1052. (27) Lavinder, J. J.; Hari, S. B.; Sullivan, B. J.; Magliery, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3794. (28) Abou-Zied, O. K.; Al-Shihi, O. I. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 10793. (29) (a) Nolting, B.; Andert, K. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 2000, 41, 288. (b) Santra, M. K.; Banerjee, A.; Krishnakumar, S. S.; Rahaman, O.; Panda, D. Eur. J. Biochem. 2004, 271, 1789. (30) Ahmad, B.; Ahmed, M. Z.; Haq, S. K.; Khan, R. H. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Protein Proteomics 2005, 1750, 93.
Figure 1. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE in the PBS buffer containing different amounts of HSA. (B) Change in the FL intensity at 475 nm with HSA concentration; I0 ) FL intensity in the absence of HSA. Inset: linear region of the binding isotherm of BSPOTPE to HSA. [BSPOTPE] ) 5 µM; λex ) 350 nm. differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and molecular modeling helped draw a mechanistic picture on the protein unfolding process. MATERIALS AND METHODS General Information. BSPOTPE was prepared according to our previously published procedures. 21b HSA, GndHCl, and other biomolecules were all purchased from Sigma and used as received. Phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with pH of 7.0 was purchased from Merck. Water was purified by a Millipore filtration system. All the experiments were performed at room temperature unless otherwise specified. UV spectra were measured on a Milton Roy Spectronic 3000 Array spectrophotometer, and FL spectra were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer LS 55 spectrofluorometer with a Xenon discharge lamp excitation. CD spectra were recorded on a Jasco J-810 spectropolarimeter in a 1 mm quartz cuvette using a step resolution of 0.2 nm, a scan speed of 100 nm/min, a sensitivity of 0.1°, and a response time of 0.5 s. Each spectrum is the average of three scans. Details about the artificial urine preparation, cytotoxicity assay, FRET study, DSC and pH-dependent FL measurements, and computation modeling are given in the Supporting Information. Sample Preparation. Stock solutions of BSPOTPE and HSA with a concentration of 1.0 mM were prepared by dissolving appropriate amounts of the luminogen and protein in the PBS buffer. The final concentration of HSA in PBS was double checked by measuring its absorbance at 279 nm. In the HSA unfolding study, HSA (0.4 µM) in PBS was incubated in the presence of different amounts of GndHCl (0.2-7.0 M) at 25 °C for 30 min. Afterward, BSPOTPE was added to the mixtures and incubated for another 30 min before spectral measurements. FL spectra were recorded in the wavelength range of 370-670 nm using 350 nm as the excitation wavelength. For the intrinsic tryptophan fluorescence study, FL spectra were collected from 310 to 570 nm using 290 nm as the excitation source. In the refolding experiment, 0.2 mM HSA was incubated in 8 M GndHCl for 24 h at 25 °C to ensure that all the proteins were fully unfolded. The denatured sample was then diluted with PBS until the final concentrations of HSA and GndHCl were equal to 0.4 µM and less than 0.1 M, respectively. Fraction of refolded proteins (F r) was calculated from the following equation: F r ) 1 - I N - I R I N - I D where IN and ID are the FL intensities of native and denatured HSA-BSPOTPE complexes, respectively, and IR is the FL intensity of BSPOTPE recovered from the refolded HSA. Electrophoresis Assay. A poly(acrylamide) gel electrophoresis (PAGE) experiment was performed on a Hoefer miniVE system under nondenaturing conditions using 5% stacking and 12% resolving native poly(acrylamide) gel at 100 V for 3hat4°C. After electrophoresis, the gel was soaked in an aqueous solution of BSPOTPE (1 mg in 100 mL ddH2O) at room temperature for 5 min. Alternatively, the gel was stained with a Coomassie Brilliant Blue (CBB) solution (0.1% w/v Coomassie Blue R250 in an aqueous mixture containing 10% methanol and 7% acetic acid) for6htoovernight on a rotary shaker with gentle mixing, followed by destaining in an aqueous solution containing 10% methanol and 7% acetic acid for 1 to 2 h until the background of the gel became transparent. An AlphadigiDoc system with a DE-500 MultiImage II light cabinet and an ML-26 UV transilluminator (Alpha Innotech) was used for data collection and analysis. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Protein Quantitation in Solution. BSPOTPE is soluble in water but insoluble in common organic solvents, such as acetonitrile, THF, and chloroform. Its FL quantum yield (ΦF) is increased from 0.37% in water to 17.5% in acetonitrile, where the luminogen molecules aggregate. The BSPOTPE solution in PBS is feebly luminescent at 390 nm in the absence of HSA (Figure 1A). When a small amount of HSA is added, the BSPOTPE solution becomes luminescent. Its FL intensity at 475 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010 (1) 7037
- Page 1 and 2:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6745-6750 Let
- Page 3 and 4:
purchased from Invitrogen-Molecular
- Page 5 and 6:
Figure 3. Electropherograms of TPP-
- Page 7 and 8:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6751-6755 Res
- Page 9 and 10:
(pH 8.0) with cysteine and cystamin
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 4. Ion mobility mass spectra
- Page 13 and 14:
GOx glucose + O298 gluconic acid +
- Page 15 and 16:
coater at 2000 rpm for 20 s, and th
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 5. Comparison of cyclic volt
- Page 19 and 20:
in channels with either no grooves
- Page 21 and 22:
indicators of atmospheric processin
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1. GC/MS total ion chromatog
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 2. Concentrations and Stable
- Page 27 and 28:
on a substrate are preferred. 20-24
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 4. SERS analysis of NAADP co
- Page 31 and 32:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6775-6781 Hig
- Page 33 and 34:
tion, 2 µL of proprionaldehyde wer
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 4. Analysis of 2a by HPLC-MS
- Page 37 and 38:
eaction of 1a with PBH can be condu
- Page 39 and 40:
Numerous references had demonstrate
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 1. TEM images of the prepare
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4. Schematic representation
- Page 45 and 46:
esult in a big SPR signal change wi
- Page 47 and 48:
also reduces chemical noise, which
- Page 49 and 50:
Table 1. Extraction Yields, Liquid
- Page 51 and 52:
scanning of AMPP amides of the anal
- Page 53 and 54:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6797-6806 δ
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure 1. Schematic view of the pre
- Page 57 and 58:
from the specimen and enclosed in a
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 4. (A) IRMS mass-44 chromato
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3. Ambient Measurement Result
- Page 63 and 64:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6807-6813 Dir
- Page 65 and 66:
Polymerase (1 U per sample). Reacti
- Page 67 and 68:
of which was constant for all ampli
- Page 69 and 70:
analytically useful signals at less
- Page 71 and 72:
carbon black and RP-C18 for the ext
- Page 73 and 74:
solution in an equal volume, and 1
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 2. Concentrations and Ratios
- Page 77 and 78:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6821-6829 Mac
- Page 79 and 80:
mg/mL protein, followed by separati
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 2. Productivity of SEQUST an
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 4. High-resolution MS/MS spe
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 6. Characterization of PSMs
- Page 87 and 88:
containing T-T mismatches. 23 Based
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 1. Extinction spectra of sol
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3. (A) The value of Ex650 nm
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 5. Extinction spectra and co
- Page 95 and 96:
wished to explore the dehydration o
- Page 97 and 98:
constant medium for separation; we
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 2. Standards of (Pi)n, n ) 1
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5. Quantitative calibration
- Page 103 and 104:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6847-6853 Met
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 1. 226 Ra spectrum by liquid
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Counting Properties and De
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 3. Analysis of 226 Ra in Sedi
- Page 111 and 112:
mercial microarray scanner and fabr
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 2. Optical transmission meas
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5. Volcano plots detailing t
- Page 117 and 118:
data as well. The 41 genes in Table
- Page 119 and 120:
corresponding compound if its chemi
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 1. Absolute Quantification Re
- Page 125 and 126:
ment. Therefore, the long-time drea
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 1. Chemically actuated micro
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 2. Influence of a surfactant
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 5. Device to eject and mix s
- Page 133 and 134:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6877-6886 Imm
- Page 135 and 136:
NaCl, phosphate buffer saline (PBS)
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 2. Product ion mass spectra
- Page 139 and 140:
-70 °C resolved the problem, givin
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 1. Intraday Precision and Acc
- Page 143 and 144:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6887-6894 Fer
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of (A) u
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms obta
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 6. Calculated charge from ch
- Page 151 and 152:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6895-6903 Ele
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 1. Chemical Structure, pKa Va
- Page 155 and 156:
pH with a tilted baseline (Figure 1
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 2. Linearity and Detection Li
- Page 159 and 160:
ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA),
- Page 161 and 162:
the multielement capabilities, the
- Page 163 and 164:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Sulfur Detec
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 2. Molecular Properties and C
- Page 167 and 168:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6911-6918 Dir
- Page 169 and 170:
dilution and hybridization buffer.
- Page 171 and 172:
solution under appropriate incubati
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 4. Standardization curve for
- Page 175 and 176:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6919-6925 Ele
- Page 177 and 178:
the ×10 objective, to have a large
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 2. With a suitable removal o
- Page 181 and 182:
the NB signal in a much better foot
- Page 183 and 184:
Scheme 1. Reactions of Selenium Rea
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 2. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 187 and 188:
Figure 4. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 189 and 190:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6933-6939 Dif
- Page 191 and 192:
trode 28 by a finite element using
- Page 193 and 194:
Figure 4. Comparison between simula
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 6. Comparison between simula
- Page 197 and 198:
educed in the vicinity of double bo
- Page 199 and 200:
Figure 2. Normalized product ion ab
- Page 201 and 202:
Figure 4. EID (a) and IRMPD (b) of
- Page 203 and 204:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6947-6957 Ide
- Page 205 and 206:
Figure 1. Schematic flowchart showi
- Page 207 and 208:
difference, ppm compound Table 1. I
- Page 209 and 210:
isoforms, its successful use, in th
- Page 211 and 212:
Figure 5. Extracted ion current ESI
- Page 213 and 214:
m/z 1172.935 was observed for Ser14
- Page 215 and 216:
linked products via affinity tags.
- Page 217 and 218:
Scheme 2. Fragmentation Mechanism o
- Page 219 and 220:
Figure 1. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 221 and 222:
Figure 3. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure 5. (A) MALDI-TOF/TOF product
- Page 225 and 226:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6969-6975 Ana
- Page 227 and 228:
Figure 3. Equilibrium response as a
- Page 229 and 230:
Figure 6. The average measured resp
- Page 231 and 232:
for the fill time, and we find that
- Page 233 and 234:
nucleotide tails. 3-5 Thus, the amo
- Page 235 and 236:
allow the use of higher aptamer con
- Page 237 and 238:
quent ligation of the aptamers afte
- Page 239 and 240:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6983-6990 Imp
- Page 241 and 242: Figure 2. Configuration editor wind
- Page 243 and 244: Figure 4. Dependencies between volu
- Page 245 and 246: Since the time for liquid expulsion
- Page 247 and 248: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6991-6999 Int
- Page 249 and 250: Figure 1. Representation of the Car
- Page 251 and 252: Table 2. Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 253 and 254: Figure 4. (A) Typical raw electroph
- Page 255 and 256: field. DNA profiles were delivered
- Page 257 and 258: Another approach to handle this lim
- Page 259 and 260: (principal components, PCs) in whic
- Page 261 and 262: Figure 5. Relevant score plots and
- Page 263 and 264: CONCLUSIONS In this paper we have i
- Page 265 and 266: electroactive-species loaded liposo
- Page 267 and 268: Figure 2. Qdot-based FLFTS response
- Page 269 and 270: Figure 6. Fluorescence imaging of Q
- Page 271 and 272: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7015-7020 Sel
- Page 273 and 274: Table 1. Effect of 1 D-LC Condition
- Page 275 and 276: Figure 3. Peak-production rate vers
- Page 277 and 278: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7021-7026 Cel
- Page 279 and 280: luciferase (T7 control vector) was
- Page 281 and 282: Figure 3. Inhibitory effects of luc
- Page 283 and 284: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7027-7034 Pat
- Page 285 and 286: Electrochemistry. Electrochemical m
- Page 287 and 288: Figure 2. SEM images of Au substrat
- Page 289 and 290: Table 3. Film Thickness Measurement
- Page 291: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7035-7043 Qua
- Page 295 and 296: Figure 4. (A) Variation in the FL i
- Page 297 and 298: Figure 6. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE
- Page 299 and 300: Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for Fl
- Page 301 and 302: one or more drawbacks including poo
- Page 303 and 304: Figure 2. Free fluorophores do not
- Page 305 and 306: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7049-7052 Dev
- Page 307 and 308: Figure 2. Comparative analysis of d