For the analysis of complex sample mixtures, as for example encountered in proteomics research, the peak capacities that can be realized with one-dimensional ( 1 D) LC often do not suffice to achieve complete separation of all compounds. Multidimensional separation approaches have the potential to separate thousands of components within a reasonable time. In first approximation, the maximum peak capacity in two-dimensional LC is the product of the peak capacities of the individual dimensions, provided that the two retention mechanisms are orthogonal. 15 Comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography, where all essential fractions of the sample are being analyzed in both dimensions, can be subdivided into two main categories, i.e., online comprehensive two-dimensional LC (or LC×LC) and off-line comprehensive two-dimensional LC (or LC/×/LC). 16 In LC×LC, column dimensions must be selected such that the eluent composition and transfer volume match the LC conditions used in the second dimension. Schoenmakers showed that the maximum flow rate in the first-dimension and, consequently, the diameter of the 1 D column depends on the maximum injection volume in the second dimension and on the second-dimension analysis time. 17 The optimization of sampling time in online two-dimensional LC has recently been reviewed by Guiochon et al. 18 When the sampling rate is too low, resolution achieved in the first dimension is partially lost. However, more time is available to achieve a high peak capacity in the second dimension. The fraction of potential peak capacity of the twodimensional combination of columns that is lost due to the selection of a too small modulation frequency is described by the “Nobuo factor” (modulation efficiency). 19 Typically, for LC×LC, two cuts per first-dimension peak provides the best trade-off between the loss of resolution in the first dimension and the analysis time in the second dimension. 19,20 However, from a practical point of view, this is difficult to achieve since modulation-phase effects and the random sampling process must be considered. The off-line approach (LC/×/LC) offers more flexibility for the selection of column dimensions and elution conditions, since the second-dimension analysis time can be optimized independently from the first-dimension sampling time. In addition, the organic modifier can be evaporated, so that fractions can be concentrated or dissolved in a different solvent prior to reinjection. 18,21 To enhance the preconcentration of peptides or proteins on a trap column, a strong ion-pairing agent can be added prior to the second-dimension separation. 21 As a result, the flow rates, transfer volumes, and the compatibility of (first and second dimension) eluent composition are less critical issues in LC/×/LC. The LC/×/LC setup can be optimized for proteomics applications. A large I.D. first-dimension column can be used, which provides (15) Giddings, J. C. Anal. Chem. 1984, 65, 1258A–1270A. (16) Schoenmakers, P. J.; Marriott, P.; Beens, J. LC-GC Eur. 2003, 16, 335– 339. (17) van der Horst, A.; Schoenmakers, P. J. J. Chromatogr., A 2003, 1000, 693– 709. (18) Guiochon, G.; Marchetti, M.; Mriziq, K.; Shalliker, R. A. J. Chromatogr., A 2008, 1189, 109–168. (19) Horie, K.; Kimura, K.; Ikegami, T.; Iwatsuka, A.; Saad, N.; Fiehn, O.; Tanaka, N. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 3764–3770. (20) Davis, J. M.; Stoll, D. R.; Carr, P. W. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 461–473. (21) Eeltink, S.; Dolman, S.; Swart, R.; Ursem, M.; Schoenmakers, P. J. J. Chromatogr., A 2009, 1216, 7368–7374. 7016 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010 sufficient loadability for the analysis of samples with a broad dynamic range. A small I.D. column can be applied in the second dimension, minimizing chromatographic dilution and maximizing ionization efficiency when coupling LC with mass spectrometry via an electrospray interface. Huber and co-workers compared the sequence coverage obtained after an LC/×/LC-MS/MS separation of a tryptic digest of C. glutamicum using either a strong cationexchange (SCX) column or a reversed-phase (RP) column operated at high pH in the first dimension and a reversed-phase monolith operated at low pH in the second dimension. 22,23 They observed that the SCX/×/RP and RP/×/RP approaches complemented each other. Recently, our group compared the 1 D-LC performance of a 50 mm long monolithic column with that of an LC/×/LC approach employing a weak-anion exchange and an RP monolithic column in the first and second dimensions, respectively. 24 At the conditions applied, the WAX/×/RP approach provided a better peak-capacity-per-analysis-time ratio for separations requiring a peak capacity of 400 or higher. The present contribution discusses how to maximize the peakproduction rate in off-line comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography for the reversed-phase separations (RP/×/RP) of peptides performed at high and low pH using monolithic column technology. The effects of the first-dimension ( 1 D) column dimensions (length and diameter) and LC conditions (flow rate and gradient time) on peak width and sampling volume are discussed. In addition, the effects of 2 D column length and gradient time on peak-production rate in 2 D-LC are demonstrated at “undersampling” conditions (i.e., containing fewer fractions than required to essentially maintain the first-dimension separation). Finally, the potential of RP/×/RP is demonstrated with separations of proteomic samples of varying complexity. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION <strong>Chemical</strong>s and Materials. Acetonitrile (ACN, HPLC supragradient quality), heptafluorobutyric acid (HFBA, ULC/MS quality), and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA, ULC/MS quality) were purchasedfromBiosolve(Valkenswaard,TheNetherlands).Ammonium bicarbonate (min. 99%), dithiothreitol (min. 99%), iodoacetic acid (approximately 99%), guanidine-HCl, sodium chloride (analytical reagent grade), cytochrome c (bovine heart), and apo-transferrin (bovine, g98%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany). Lysozyme (hen egg white), alcohol dehydrogenase (yeast), serum albumin (bovine, assay >96%), �-galactosidase, and sodium phosphate monobasic dihydrate (analytical reagent grade) were obtained from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Escherichia coli (E. coli, strain K12) protein sample (lyophilized) was obtained from Bio-Rad Laboratories (Veenendaal, The Netherlands). Preconcentration and desalting of peptides prior to the analytical separation was performed ona5mm× 0.2 mm I.D. monolithic trap column (Pepswift RP, Dionex Benelux, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). HPLC separations were performed with 50 mm × 0.2 mm and 250 mm × 0.2 mm monolithic PepSwift RP columns (22) Delmotte, N.; Lasaosa, M.; Tholey, A.; Heinzle, E; Huber, C. G. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6, 4363–4373. (23) Toll, H.; Oberacher, H.; Swart, R.; Huber, C. G. J. Chromatogr., A 2005, 1079, 274–286. (24) Eeltink, S.; Dolman, S.; Detobel, F.; Desmet, G.; Swart, R.; Ursem, M. J. Sep. Sci. 2009, 32, 2504–2509.
Table 1. Effect of 1 D-LC Conditions on Sampling Time and Number of Fractions Collected When Applying a Modulation Ration (MR) ∼2 per 1 D Peak a I.D. (mm) flow rate (µL/min) gradient time (min) 4σ peak width (s) sampling time (s) sampling volume (µL) no. fractions 0.2 2 10 5.5 2.8 0.09 214 1 60 10 5.8 2.6 2.4 231 a Column length is 50 mm; 1 µL injection of the six-protein digest; aqueous acetonitrile gradient from 1-26% (ACN) at pH ) 8; detection at 214 nm. and with a 50 mm × 1 mm monolithic ProSwift RP-10R column (Dionex). Preparation of Tryptic Digests. The six-protein mixture prepared from transferrin, bovine serum albumin, �-galactosidase, alcohol dehydrogenase, lysozyme, cytochrome, and E. coli proteins were digested according the following procedure. Proteins were reduced for1hat60°C in the presence of 7 mol/L guanidine and 1 mol/L dithiothreitol, followed by alkylation for 30 min at room temperature by adding 1 mol/L iodoacetic acid. To consume any unreacted iodoacetic acid, 1 mol/L dithiothreitol was added. The reduced and alkylated proteins were then dialyzed against 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (pH 8) for 24 h in dialysis sacks (Sigma) with a cutoff 0.997). Therefore, the relationship 2 wb ) a + b( 2 tG) can be established, which holds at a constant length. After fitting, the a and b parameters were used to predict the peak capacity as a function <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010 7017
- Page 1 and 2:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6745-6750 Let
- Page 3 and 4:
purchased from Invitrogen-Molecular
- Page 5 and 6:
Figure 3. Electropherograms of TPP-
- Page 7 and 8:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6751-6755 Res
- Page 9 and 10:
(pH 8.0) with cysteine and cystamin
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 4. Ion mobility mass spectra
- Page 13 and 14:
GOx glucose + O298 gluconic acid +
- Page 15 and 16:
coater at 2000 rpm for 20 s, and th
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 5. Comparison of cyclic volt
- Page 19 and 20:
in channels with either no grooves
- Page 21 and 22:
indicators of atmospheric processin
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1. GC/MS total ion chromatog
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 2. Concentrations and Stable
- Page 27 and 28:
on a substrate are preferred. 20-24
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 4. SERS analysis of NAADP co
- Page 31 and 32:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6775-6781 Hig
- Page 33 and 34:
tion, 2 µL of proprionaldehyde wer
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 4. Analysis of 2a by HPLC-MS
- Page 37 and 38:
eaction of 1a with PBH can be condu
- Page 39 and 40:
Numerous references had demonstrate
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 1. TEM images of the prepare
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4. Schematic representation
- Page 45 and 46:
esult in a big SPR signal change wi
- Page 47 and 48:
also reduces chemical noise, which
- Page 49 and 50:
Table 1. Extraction Yields, Liquid
- Page 51 and 52:
scanning of AMPP amides of the anal
- Page 53 and 54:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6797-6806 δ
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure 1. Schematic view of the pre
- Page 57 and 58:
from the specimen and enclosed in a
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 4. (A) IRMS mass-44 chromato
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3. Ambient Measurement Result
- Page 63 and 64:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6807-6813 Dir
- Page 65 and 66:
Polymerase (1 U per sample). Reacti
- Page 67 and 68:
of which was constant for all ampli
- Page 69 and 70:
analytically useful signals at less
- Page 71 and 72:
carbon black and RP-C18 for the ext
- Page 73 and 74:
solution in an equal volume, and 1
- Page 75 and 76:
Table 2. Concentrations and Ratios
- Page 77 and 78:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6821-6829 Mac
- Page 79 and 80:
mg/mL protein, followed by separati
- Page 81 and 82:
Figure 2. Productivity of SEQUST an
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 4. High-resolution MS/MS spe
- Page 85 and 86:
Figure 6. Characterization of PSMs
- Page 87 and 88:
containing T-T mismatches. 23 Based
- Page 89 and 90:
Figure 1. Extinction spectra of sol
- Page 91 and 92:
Figure 3. (A) The value of Ex650 nm
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 5. Extinction spectra and co
- Page 95 and 96:
wished to explore the dehydration o
- Page 97 and 98:
constant medium for separation; we
- Page 99 and 100:
Figure 2. Standards of (Pi)n, n ) 1
- Page 101 and 102:
Figure 5. Quantitative calibration
- Page 103 and 104:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6847-6853 Met
- Page 105 and 106:
Figure 1. 226 Ra spectrum by liquid
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 1. Counting Properties and De
- Page 109 and 110:
Table 3. Analysis of 226 Ra in Sedi
- Page 111 and 112:
mercial microarray scanner and fabr
- Page 113 and 114:
Figure 2. Optical transmission meas
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5. Volcano plots detailing t
- Page 117 and 118:
data as well. The 41 genes in Table
- Page 119 and 120:
corresponding compound if its chemi
- Page 121 and 122:
Figure 1. Schematic illustration of
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 1. Absolute Quantification Re
- Page 125 and 126:
ment. Therefore, the long-time drea
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 1. Chemically actuated micro
- Page 129 and 130:
Figure 2. Influence of a surfactant
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 5. Device to eject and mix s
- Page 133 and 134:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6877-6886 Imm
- Page 135 and 136:
NaCl, phosphate buffer saline (PBS)
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 2. Product ion mass spectra
- Page 139 and 140:
-70 °C resolved the problem, givin
- Page 141 and 142:
Table 1. Intraday Precision and Acc
- Page 143 and 144:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6887-6894 Fer
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 1. Infrared spectra of (A) u
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms obta
- Page 149 and 150:
Figure 6. Calculated charge from ch
- Page 151 and 152:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6895-6903 Ele
- Page 153 and 154:
Table 1. Chemical Structure, pKa Va
- Page 155 and 156:
pH with a tilted baseline (Figure 1
- Page 157 and 158:
Table 2. Linearity and Detection Li
- Page 159 and 160:
ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA),
- Page 161 and 162:
the multielement capabilities, the
- Page 163 and 164:
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Sulfur Detec
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 2. Molecular Properties and C
- Page 167 and 168:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6911-6918 Dir
- Page 169 and 170:
dilution and hybridization buffer.
- Page 171 and 172:
solution under appropriate incubati
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 4. Standardization curve for
- Page 175 and 176:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6919-6925 Ele
- Page 177 and 178:
the ×10 objective, to have a large
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 2. With a suitable removal o
- Page 181 and 182:
the NB signal in a much better foot
- Page 183 and 184:
Scheme 1. Reactions of Selenium Rea
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 2. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 187 and 188:
Figure 4. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 189 and 190:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6933-6939 Dif
- Page 191 and 192:
trode 28 by a finite element using
- Page 193 and 194:
Figure 4. Comparison between simula
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 6. Comparison between simula
- Page 197 and 198:
educed in the vicinity of double bo
- Page 199 and 200:
Figure 2. Normalized product ion ab
- Page 201 and 202:
Figure 4. EID (a) and IRMPD (b) of
- Page 203 and 204:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6947-6957 Ide
- Page 205 and 206:
Figure 1. Schematic flowchart showi
- Page 207 and 208:
difference, ppm compound Table 1. I
- Page 209 and 210:
isoforms, its successful use, in th
- Page 211 and 212:
Figure 5. Extracted ion current ESI
- Page 213 and 214:
m/z 1172.935 was observed for Ser14
- Page 215 and 216:
linked products via affinity tags.
- Page 217 and 218:
Scheme 2. Fragmentation Mechanism o
- Page 219 and 220:
Figure 1. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 221 and 222: Figure 3. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 223 and 224: Figure 5. (A) MALDI-TOF/TOF product
- Page 225 and 226: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6969-6975 Ana
- Page 227 and 228: Figure 3. Equilibrium response as a
- Page 229 and 230: Figure 6. The average measured resp
- Page 231 and 232: for the fill time, and we find that
- Page 233 and 234: nucleotide tails. 3-5 Thus, the amo
- Page 235 and 236: allow the use of higher aptamer con
- Page 237 and 238: quent ligation of the aptamers afte
- Page 239 and 240: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6983-6990 Imp
- Page 241 and 242: Figure 2. Configuration editor wind
- Page 243 and 244: Figure 4. Dependencies between volu
- Page 245 and 246: Since the time for liquid expulsion
- Page 247 and 248: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6991-6999 Int
- Page 249 and 250: Figure 1. Representation of the Car
- Page 251 and 252: Table 2. Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 253 and 254: Figure 4. (A) Typical raw electroph
- Page 255 and 256: field. DNA profiles were delivered
- Page 257 and 258: Another approach to handle this lim
- Page 259 and 260: (principal components, PCs) in whic
- Page 261 and 262: Figure 5. Relevant score plots and
- Page 263 and 264: CONCLUSIONS In this paper we have i
- Page 265 and 266: electroactive-species loaded liposo
- Page 267 and 268: Figure 2. Qdot-based FLFTS response
- Page 269 and 270: Figure 6. Fluorescence imaging of Q
- Page 271: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7015-7020 Sel
- Page 275 and 276: Figure 3. Peak-production rate vers
- Page 277 and 278: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7021-7026 Cel
- Page 279 and 280: luciferase (T7 control vector) was
- Page 281 and 282: Figure 3. Inhibitory effects of luc
- Page 283 and 284: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7027-7034 Pat
- Page 285 and 286: Electrochemistry. Electrochemical m
- Page 287 and 288: Figure 2. SEM images of Au substrat
- Page 289 and 290: Table 3. Film Thickness Measurement
- Page 291 and 292: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7035-7043 Qua
- Page 293 and 294: Figure 1. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE
- Page 295 and 296: Figure 4. (A) Variation in the FL i
- Page 297 and 298: Figure 6. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE
- Page 299 and 300: Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for Fl
- Page 301 and 302: one or more drawbacks including poo
- Page 303 and 304: Figure 2. Free fluorophores do not
- Page 305 and 306: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7049-7052 Dev
- Page 307 and 308: Figure 2. Comparative analysis of d