14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Figure 1. Response of an FSCR to a 2000 s exposure of p-xylene<br />

at an activity of 0.019. The conductance drops exponentially and then<br />

recovers on the same time scale during the nitrogen purge.<br />

for most vapor detection applications), twice the analyte vapor<br />

pressure gives twice the swelling, yet also gives twice the number<br />

density of analyte molecules, and thus twice the diffusive flux. A<br />

swelling time that is independent of the analyte concentration is<br />

highly desirable, since it would simplify the interpretation of<br />

kinetics data. In fact, the raw data we collect are sensor response<br />

versus time, so the response must be converted to polymer<br />

swelling before the swelling time can be computed. This is<br />

accomplished using the transduction curve of the particular<br />

chemiresistor, which is the relation between its change in<br />

conductance and equilibrium swelling. In a previous paper we have<br />

shown that this transduction curve is independent of the analyte,<br />

and so can be determined from testing the chemiresistor with<br />

any particular analyte, regardless of its affinity for the polymer. 18,19<br />

The kinetics data we present were taken with the fieldstructured<br />

chemiresistors (FSCRs) we have developed over the<br />

past several years. 18-23 These sensors differ from traditional<br />

carbon black chemiresistors in that the particle phase is composed<br />

of Au-coated Ni particles that are structured into conducting<br />

pathways using magnetic fields. Field-structuring consistently<br />

brings the particle phase to a conducting threshold over a wide<br />

range of particle volume fractions, and the Au-coated particles do<br />

not adsorb typical VOCs. As a result, FSCRs have significantly<br />

increased baseline stability, sensitivity, reversibility, and sensorto-sensor<br />

reproducibility. 18<br />

BACKGROUND<br />

Response Curve. The response of a chemiresistor exposed<br />

to a step increase in analyte concentration is given in Figure 1.<br />

The conductance drops to its equilibrium value as the polymer<br />

swells and then recovers on the same time scale as the polymer<br />

deswells. FSCR response is defined as the conductance ratio G/G0,<br />

where G and G0 are the conductances in the presence and<br />

absence of analyte, respectively. Plotting the equilibrium value<br />

of G/G0 as a function of analyte concentration gives a sigmoidal<br />

(18) Read, D. H.; Martin, J. E. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2010, 20 (11), 1–8.<br />

(19) Read, D. H.; Martin, J. E. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82 (12), 5373–5379.<br />

(20) Martin, J. E.; Anderson, R. A.; Odinek, J.; Adolf, D.; Williamson, J. Phys.<br />

Rev. B 2003, 67, 094207.<br />

(21) Martin, J. E.; Hughes, R. C.; Anderson, R. A. Sensor Devices Comprising<br />

Field Structured Composites. U.S. Patent 6,194,769, Feb 27, 2001.<br />

(22) Martin, J. E.; Hughes, R. C.; Anderson, R. A. Field-Structured Material Media<br />

and Methods for Synthesis Thereof. U.S. Patent 6,290,868, Sept 18, 2001.<br />

(23) Read, D. H.; Martin, J. E. Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 2150–2154.<br />

6970 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

Figure 2. The FSCR equilibrium conductance versus analyte activity<br />

plot forms a sigmoidal curve, which is parametrized by Γ and the<br />

response midpoint, a1/2. For example, the acetone curve has a<br />

response midpoint of ∼0.15, and the detection range is from an<br />

activity of ∼0.01 to an activity of 0.36. Response curves for this single<br />

FSCR exposed to various analytes illustrate selectivity for more<br />

hydrophobic analytes. As evident, these equilibrium data do not<br />

discriminate between chemically similar analytes.<br />

equilibrium response curve, as in Figure 2. Because the relative<br />

resistance change, ∆R/R0, is exponential with the analyte<br />

concentration, the relative conductance can be fit by 18<br />

G<br />

)<br />

G [ 0<br />

1 + eΓa/a1/2 - 1<br />

e Γ -1<br />

- 1 ]<br />

Here a is the analyte vapor activity, Γ is a fit parameter related to<br />

the abruptness of the conductor-insulator transition (typically<br />

∼4), and a1/2 is the response midpoint, defined as the analyte<br />

activity that reduces G0 by half.<br />

Figure 2 shows that a poly(dimethylsiloxane) chemiresistor<br />

is much more sensitive to the hydrophobic analytes toluene,<br />

p-xylene, mesitylene, and undecane than to the hydrophilic analyte<br />

acetone. In fact, the response midpoint for propanol is nearly 10×<br />

that of toluene or p-xylene. Although this polymer is selective for<br />

hydrophobic analytes, the equilibrium response cannot be used<br />

to discriminate between different analytes unless the analyte<br />

activity is known. More typically, these data would be used to<br />

determine the activity of a known analyte.<br />

Transduction Curve. We have previously shown that the<br />

response of an FSCR is a universal function of polymer swelling,<br />

regardless of the chemical nature of the analyte. 18,19 The response<br />

curve in Figure 2 can thus be thought of as a combination of a<br />

solely device-dependent transduction curve (conductance as a<br />

function of swelling) and the solely analyte-dependent mass<br />

sorption isotherm that relates polymer swelling to the vapor<br />

concentration. The transduction curve for a typical sensor is shown<br />

in Figure 3, with the volume fraction of absorbed analyte<br />

determined gravimetrically. This curve is given by<br />

G<br />

)<br />

G [ 0<br />

1 + eΓφ/φ1/2 - 1<br />

e Γ -1<br />

- 1 ]<br />

where φ is the volume fraction of absorbed analyte and φ1/2 is<br />

the response midpoint. The transduction curve is parametrized<br />

by φ1/2 and Γ, and these are strongly dependent on the<br />

fabrication process used to make the sensor. 18,19,23 To a good<br />

(1)<br />

(2)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!