Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6862–6869 Gas Chromatography-Combustion-Mass Spectrometry with Postcolumn Isotope Dilution for Compound-Independent Quantification: Its Potential to Assess HS-SPME Procedures Sergio Cueto Díaz, Jorge Ruiz Encinar,* Alfredo Sanz-Medel, and J. Ignacio García Alonso* Department of Physical and <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, University of Oviedo, Julián Clavería 8, 33006 Oviedo, Spain A quadrupole GC-MS instrument with an electron ionization (EI) source has been modified to enable application of postcolumn isotope dilution analysis for the standardless quantification of organic compounds injected in the gas chromatograph. Instrumental modifications included the quantitative conversion of the separated compounds into CO 2, using a postcolumn combustion furnace, and the subsequent mixing of the gas with a constant flow of 13 CO2 diluted in helium. The online measurement of the 12 CO2/ 13 CO2 (44/45) ratio in the EI-MS allowed us to obtain quantitative data without resorting to compound-specific standards. Validation of the procedure involved the analysis of standard solutions containing different families of organic compounds (C 9-C20 linear hydrocarbons, BTEX and esters) obtaining satisfactory results in all cases in terms of absolute errors (
corresponding compound if its chemical formula is known. Until now such methodology has been exclusively applied to the quantitative determination of compounds containing ICPMS detectable elements for trace-elemental speciation of metals 9 or semimetals. 10,11 Unfortunately, the use of the ICPMS for the detection of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, or oxygen is seriously hampered by the low ionization yields of these elements in the ICP and the high carbon background under normal ICP operating conditions (atmospheric pressure). In fact, there are only two reports so far describing the use of HPLC and the postcolumn addition of 13 C-labeled species for the quantification of organic compounds by ICP-MS. 12,13 In both cases, the observed detection limits were not satisfactory. For the MS detection of organic compounds, previously separated by GC, electron ionization (EI) is the most common ionization source employed. It provides both structural and quantitative information of any volatile organic compound injected in the gas chromatograph. Unfortunately, as pointed out before, it requires specific analytical standards as its response is structurespecific for each single molecule subjected to analysis. 14 Recently, we have introduced a new quantitative detection concept in gas chromatography, based on the postcolumn addition of 13 CO2 for carbon isotope dilution analysis using EI. 15 This concept constitutes a patented procedure in which organic compounds separated by liquid or gas chromatography are converted quantitatively into carbon dioxide, by an oxidation or combustion reaction, and then are mixed with a postcolumn flow of enriched 13 CO2. 16 This procedure should provide quantitative information of every single compound previously separated in the chromatograph without the need for individual standards. We selected electron ionization because it operates under high vacuum conditions providing much better sensitivity and lower background for carbon detection than the above-mentioned ICP atmospheric source. For the correct application of isotope dilution analysis conversion of all carbon containing compounds to a unique chemical species is required (isotope equilibration). The isotopic equilibrium between the 13 C-containing species continuously added postcolumn ( 13 CO2) and the separated organic compounds is reached by their quantitative conversion into CO2, after the chromatographic separation, in a combustion furnace. 17 As the only species to be finally measured by EI is CO2, compound independent response and isotopic equilibration is finally obtained. This approach can become a universal quantitative detector in GC-MS analysis, without the classical need for specific standards and, what is more, it is compatible with the exceptional structural identification capabilities provided by current GC-EI-MS instruments. Thus, in this work (9) Sariego-Muñiz, C.; Marchante-Gayón, J. M.; García-Alonso, J. I.; Sanz-Medel, A. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2001, 16, 587–592. (10) Giusti, P.; Schaumlöffel, D.; Ruiz-Encinar, J.; Szpunar, J. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2005, 20, 1101–1107. (11) Heilmann, J.; Heumann, K. G. Anal. Chem. 2008, 80, 1952–1961. (12) Vogl, J.; Heumann, K. G. Anal. Chem. 1998, 70, 2038–2043. (13) Smith, C.; Jensen, B. P.; Wilson, I. D.; Abou-Shakra, F.; Crowther, D. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 18, 1487–1492. (14) Mark, T. D. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Phys. 1982, 45, 125–145. (15) Cueto-Díaz, S.; Ruiz-Encinar, J.; Sanz-Medel, A.; García-Alonso, J. I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2561–2564. (16) Ruiz-Encinar, J.; García-Alonso, J. I World Intellectual Property Organization, Spain; International Patent WO 2007/042597 A1, 2007. (17) Merritt, D. A.; Freeman, K. H.; Ricci, M. P.; Studley, S. A.; Hayes, J. M. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67, 2461–2473. we describe the instrumental developments and its analytical features for integral characterization and determination of organic compounds in detail. Furthermore, the compound-independent quantification provided by the developed approach can be an inestimable tool in the optimization and quantitative assessment of sample extraction and preconcentration procedures applied prior to GC-MS analysis. For instance, solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is today a widely used preconcentration technique in Gas Chromatography. 18 Fiber absorption and recovery are common parameters used when validating a given SPME procedure. However, those two parameters are almost impossible to compute using conventional approaches. 19 In fact, it is necessary to inject specific liquid standards and to assume that the transfer efficiency in the GC injector for every compound under analysis is the same when using conventional injection and the thermal desorption. Thus, the important topic of absolute absorption yields will be evaluated in this work, as exemplified for the HS-SPME analysis of BTEX (Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and o,m,p-Xylenes) in different water samples, using the proposed IDA-EI-MS quantification procedure. EXPERIMENTAL SECTION Reagents and Materials. Solid enriched Na2CO3 (99% 13 C enrichment) was obtained as a highly pure chemical reagent (purity >98%) from Cambridge Isotopes Laboratories (Andover, Massachusetts, USA). A standard mixture of n-alkanes (40 µg/ mL each in n-hexane) was purchased from Fluka (Seelze, Germany). Phosphoric acid (99% puriss.) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, USA). Individual compounds (undecane, dodecane, tridecane, pentadecane, butyl butyrate, and hexyl butanoate) with certified purities ranging from 99 to 99,7% were used as analytical standards (Fluka, Seelze, Germany or Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). A solution of 1,2,4-trimethylbenzene in methanol (5000 µg/mL) and a BTEX standard mixture (2000 µg/mL each in methanol) were both from Supelco (Bellefonte, USA). Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩcm) was obtained with a Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA). n-Hexane for organic trace analysis grade was purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). SPME holder and fibers were purchased from Supelco (Bellefonte, USA). Instrumentation. GC-MS. A Konik-Tech (Sant Cugat del Vallés, Spain) 4000-B Gas Chromatograph coupled to a Konik- Tech MS-Q12 quadrupole mass spectrometer with an electron ionization source was used. This instrument uses a specially designed injector which keeps the septum at relatively low temperature, does not require a septum purge flow, and minimizes losses of organic compounds in the injector port. The analytical column was a 30 m long (0.32 mm internal diameter, 0.25 µm stationary phase) DB-XLB column (Agilent J&W Scientific, Santa Clara, USA). The sample volume injected in the GC was always 1 µL using manual injection. Sample injection was performed in the splitless (1 min)/split mode. Carrier gas flow was set at 1 mL/ min for all samples and conditions. Six-Way Valve. A manually actuated 0.25 mm bore stainlesssteel six-way two-position valve (VICI AG International, Schenkon, (18) Vas, G.; Vekey, K. J. Mass Spectrom. 2004, 39, 233–254. (19) Langelfeld, J. J.; Hawthorne, S. B.; Miller, D. J. Anal. Chem. 1996, 68, 144–155. <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010 6863
- Page 1 and 2:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6745-6750 Let
- Page 3 and 4:
purchased from Invitrogen-Molecular
- Page 5 and 6:
Figure 3. Electropherograms of TPP-
- Page 7 and 8:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6751-6755 Res
- Page 9 and 10:
(pH 8.0) with cysteine and cystamin
- Page 11 and 12:
Figure 4. Ion mobility mass spectra
- Page 13 and 14:
GOx glucose + O298 gluconic acid +
- Page 15 and 16:
coater at 2000 rpm for 20 s, and th
- Page 17 and 18:
Figure 5. Comparison of cyclic volt
- Page 19 and 20:
in channels with either no grooves
- Page 21 and 22:
indicators of atmospheric processin
- Page 23 and 24:
Figure 1. GC/MS total ion chromatog
- Page 25 and 26:
Table 2. Concentrations and Stable
- Page 27 and 28:
on a substrate are preferred. 20-24
- Page 29 and 30:
Figure 4. SERS analysis of NAADP co
- Page 31 and 32:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6775-6781 Hig
- Page 33 and 34:
tion, 2 µL of proprionaldehyde wer
- Page 35 and 36:
Figure 4. Analysis of 2a by HPLC-MS
- Page 37 and 38:
eaction of 1a with PBH can be condu
- Page 39 and 40:
Numerous references had demonstrate
- Page 41 and 42:
Figure 1. TEM images of the prepare
- Page 43 and 44:
Figure 4. Schematic representation
- Page 45 and 46:
esult in a big SPR signal change wi
- Page 47 and 48:
also reduces chemical noise, which
- Page 49 and 50:
Table 1. Extraction Yields, Liquid
- Page 51 and 52:
scanning of AMPP amides of the anal
- Page 53 and 54:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6797-6806 δ
- Page 55 and 56:
Figure 1. Schematic view of the pre
- Page 57 and 58:
from the specimen and enclosed in a
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 4. (A) IRMS mass-44 chromato
- Page 61 and 62:
Table 3. Ambient Measurement Result
- Page 63 and 64:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6807-6813 Dir
- Page 65 and 66:
Polymerase (1 U per sample). Reacti
- Page 67 and 68: of which was constant for all ampli
- Page 69 and 70: analytically useful signals at less
- Page 71 and 72: carbon black and RP-C18 for the ext
- Page 73 and 74: solution in an equal volume, and 1
- Page 75 and 76: Table 2. Concentrations and Ratios
- Page 77 and 78: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6821-6829 Mac
- Page 79 and 80: mg/mL protein, followed by separati
- Page 81 and 82: Figure 2. Productivity of SEQUST an
- Page 83 and 84: Figure 4. High-resolution MS/MS spe
- Page 85 and 86: Figure 6. Characterization of PSMs
- Page 87 and 88: containing T-T mismatches. 23 Based
- Page 89 and 90: Figure 1. Extinction spectra of sol
- Page 91 and 92: Figure 3. (A) The value of Ex650 nm
- Page 93 and 94: Figure 5. Extinction spectra and co
- Page 95 and 96: wished to explore the dehydration o
- Page 97 and 98: constant medium for separation; we
- Page 99 and 100: Figure 2. Standards of (Pi)n, n ) 1
- Page 101 and 102: Figure 5. Quantitative calibration
- Page 103 and 104: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6847-6853 Met
- Page 105 and 106: Figure 1. 226 Ra spectrum by liquid
- Page 107 and 108: Table 1. Counting Properties and De
- Page 109 and 110: Table 3. Analysis of 226 Ra in Sedi
- Page 111 and 112: mercial microarray scanner and fabr
- Page 113 and 114: Figure 2. Optical transmission meas
- Page 115 and 116: Figure 5. Volcano plots detailing t
- Page 117: data as well. The 41 genes in Table
- Page 121 and 122: Figure 1. Schematic illustration of
- Page 123 and 124: Table 1. Absolute Quantification Re
- Page 125 and 126: ment. Therefore, the long-time drea
- Page 127 and 128: Figure 1. Chemically actuated micro
- Page 129 and 130: Figure 2. Influence of a surfactant
- Page 131 and 132: Figure 5. Device to eject and mix s
- Page 133 and 134: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6877-6886 Imm
- Page 135 and 136: NaCl, phosphate buffer saline (PBS)
- Page 137 and 138: Figure 2. Product ion mass spectra
- Page 139 and 140: -70 °C resolved the problem, givin
- Page 141 and 142: Table 1. Intraday Precision and Acc
- Page 143 and 144: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6887-6894 Fer
- Page 145 and 146: Figure 1. Infrared spectra of (A) u
- Page 147 and 148: Figure 3. Cyclic voltammograms obta
- Page 149 and 150: Figure 6. Calculated charge from ch
- Page 151 and 152: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6895-6903 Ele
- Page 153 and 154: Table 1. Chemical Structure, pKa Va
- Page 155 and 156: pH with a tilted baseline (Figure 1
- Page 157 and 158: Table 2. Linearity and Detection Li
- Page 159 and 160: ascorbic acid (AA), uric acid (UA),
- Page 161 and 162: the multielement capabilities, the
- Page 163 and 164: RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Sulfur Detec
- Page 165 and 166: Table 2. Molecular Properties and C
- Page 167 and 168: Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6911-6918 Dir
- Page 169 and 170:
dilution and hybridization buffer.
- Page 171 and 172:
solution under appropriate incubati
- Page 173 and 174:
Figure 4. Standardization curve for
- Page 175 and 176:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6919-6925 Ele
- Page 177 and 178:
the ×10 objective, to have a large
- Page 179 and 180:
Figure 2. With a suitable removal o
- Page 181 and 182:
the NB signal in a much better foot
- Page 183 and 184:
Scheme 1. Reactions of Selenium Rea
- Page 185 and 186:
Figure 2. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 187 and 188:
Figure 4. (a) ESI-MS spectrum showi
- Page 189 and 190:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6933-6939 Dif
- Page 191 and 192:
trode 28 by a finite element using
- Page 193 and 194:
Figure 4. Comparison between simula
- Page 195 and 196:
Figure 6. Comparison between simula
- Page 197 and 198:
educed in the vicinity of double bo
- Page 199 and 200:
Figure 2. Normalized product ion ab
- Page 201 and 202:
Figure 4. EID (a) and IRMPD (b) of
- Page 203 and 204:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6947-6957 Ide
- Page 205 and 206:
Figure 1. Schematic flowchart showi
- Page 207 and 208:
difference, ppm compound Table 1. I
- Page 209 and 210:
isoforms, its successful use, in th
- Page 211 and 212:
Figure 5. Extracted ion current ESI
- Page 213 and 214:
m/z 1172.935 was observed for Ser14
- Page 215 and 216:
linked products via affinity tags.
- Page 217 and 218:
Scheme 2. Fragmentation Mechanism o
- Page 219 and 220:
Figure 1. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 221 and 222:
Figure 3. (A) ESI-LTQ-CID-MS 2 prod
- Page 223 and 224:
Figure 5. (A) MALDI-TOF/TOF product
- Page 225 and 226:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6969-6975 Ana
- Page 227 and 228:
Figure 3. Equilibrium response as a
- Page 229 and 230:
Figure 6. The average measured resp
- Page 231 and 232:
for the fill time, and we find that
- Page 233 and 234:
nucleotide tails. 3-5 Thus, the amo
- Page 235 and 236:
allow the use of higher aptamer con
- Page 237 and 238:
quent ligation of the aptamers afte
- Page 239 and 240:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6983-6990 Imp
- Page 241 and 242:
Figure 2. Configuration editor wind
- Page 243 and 244:
Figure 4. Dependencies between volu
- Page 245 and 246:
Since the time for liquid expulsion
- Page 247 and 248:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 6991-6999 Int
- Page 249 and 250:
Figure 1. Representation of the Car
- Page 251 and 252:
Table 2. Capillary Electrophoresis
- Page 253 and 254:
Figure 4. (A) Typical raw electroph
- Page 255 and 256:
field. DNA profiles were delivered
- Page 257 and 258:
Another approach to handle this lim
- Page 259 and 260:
(principal components, PCs) in whic
- Page 261 and 262:
Figure 5. Relevant score plots and
- Page 263 and 264:
CONCLUSIONS In this paper we have i
- Page 265 and 266:
electroactive-species loaded liposo
- Page 267 and 268:
Figure 2. Qdot-based FLFTS response
- Page 269 and 270:
Figure 6. Fluorescence imaging of Q
- Page 271 and 272:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7015-7020 Sel
- Page 273 and 274:
Table 1. Effect of 1 D-LC Condition
- Page 275 and 276:
Figure 3. Peak-production rate vers
- Page 277 and 278:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7021-7026 Cel
- Page 279 and 280:
luciferase (T7 control vector) was
- Page 281 and 282:
Figure 3. Inhibitory effects of luc
- Page 283 and 284:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7027-7034 Pat
- Page 285 and 286:
Electrochemistry. Electrochemical m
- Page 287 and 288:
Figure 2. SEM images of Au substrat
- Page 289 and 290:
Table 3. Film Thickness Measurement
- Page 291 and 292:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7035-7043 Qua
- Page 293 and 294:
Figure 1. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE
- Page 295 and 296:
Figure 4. (A) Variation in the FL i
- Page 297 and 298:
Figure 6. (A) FL spectra of BSPOTPE
- Page 299 and 300:
Scheme 1. Proposed Mechanism for Fl
- Page 301 and 302:
one or more drawbacks including poo
- Page 303 and 304:
Figure 2. Free fluorophores do not
- Page 305 and 306:
Anal. Chem. 2010, 82, 7049-7052 Dev
- Page 307 and 308:
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of d