14.01.2013 Views

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

Analytical Chemistry Chemical Cytometry Quantitates Superoxide

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 4. Variation of MDA and FM with respect to PSA for 226 Ra<br />

standard solutions.<br />

and � events are correctly discriminated and a counting plateau,<br />

of almost constant efficiency (ca. 265%), is observed.<br />

In order to choose the optimum value within the efficiency<br />

plateau, both MDA and FM were plotted (Figure 4). In broad<br />

terms, MDA followed the efficiency curve, suggesting that, from<br />

a limit of detection perspective and within the plateau, best results<br />

would be achieved at higher PSA, as the background slowly<br />

decreases with the PSA parameter and stabilizes for the PSA<br />

ranging from 145 to 190. It is worth noticing that, as from PSA )<br />

135 the background rate is very low, the MDA is correspondingly<br />

low. Higher PSA values are discarded from the discussion as the<br />

efficiency there tends rapidly to zero. On the other hand, the FM<br />

shows a clear peak at PSA ) 145, and shows the optimum<br />

combination of efficiency and background, taking advantage of a<br />

high efficiency (and therefore sample throughput) and providing<br />

the lowest possible MDA.<br />

Counting Window. Due to the presence of many substances<br />

in the digestate, which may be partially soluble in the scintillator,<br />

the sample may show different levels of quenching, which also<br />

affect the position of the peaks. In order to compensate for the<br />

peak shift, we opted to define counting windows with a fixed width<br />

but a variable position in the spectrum, manually set to comprise<br />

the peaks of interest.<br />

The first strategy was to define a wide counting window of<br />

150 channels. This window allowed to include, irrespective of the<br />

quenching level (quantified through the SQP(E) parameter), the<br />

three R peaks (Figure 1). The main advantage of this strategy is<br />

that counting efficiency is large, up to the maximum theoretical<br />

level of 300%, and above 200% for the real samples commonly<br />

analyzed. However, as the spectrum resolution does not allow us<br />

to distinguish other R impurities present in the sample and some<br />

� interferences, this method might lead to slight activity<br />

overestimation.<br />

In order to minimize the effect of background from impurities<br />

and interferences, the second strategy was to define a 50 channel<br />

wide counting window to only comprise the higher energy R peak<br />

( 214 Po), which stands in an area of much smaller background<br />

and interference, 15 and is easily identified. However, in this<br />

case the maximum theoretical efficiency is only 100%.<br />

Calibration. Quenching is the only parameter affecting the<br />

counting configuration that is sample-dependent and cannot be<br />

easily controlled. Therefore, several 226 Ra standard solutions were<br />

quenched with CCl4 to values covering the expected SQP(E)<br />

6850 <strong>Analytical</strong> <strong>Chemistry</strong>, Vol. 82, No. 16, August 15, 2010<br />

Figure 5. Effect of quenching (SQP(E)) on R counting efficiency.<br />

Figure 6. Time stability test for sample quenching (SQP(E)).<br />

value in environmental samples (Figure 5). For both counting<br />

windows, efficiency is close to zero for SQP(E) < 575. Therefore,<br />

the calibration curves, obtained by regression analysis between<br />

the counting efficiency (y) and the SQP(E) parameter (x), were<br />

150 channels:<br />

y ) (0.74 ( 0.06)x - (435 ( 51) and r ) 0.95<br />

50 channels:<br />

y ) (0.21 ( 0.02)x - (119 ( 19) and r ) 0.91<br />

Usually, LSC techniques involve the measurement of a batch<br />

of samples in cycles. As the typical activities expected in this type<br />

of work are low (of the order of 10 mBq), long-term counting, of<br />

the order of days for a single batch, is required. We successfully<br />

checked the stability of the scintillator through the monitoring of<br />

SQP(E) for a quenched tracer with an activity of 10 mBq during<br />

4 days (Figure 6).<br />

Detection Limits. Each counting configuration (including<br />

counting window and quenching) shows different detection limits.<br />

In Table 1, we show the counting properties for a standard solution<br />

quenched to SQP(E) ) 850, which is an average value of sediment<br />

samples analyzed in our laboratory. The combination of the<br />

indirect detection of 226 Ra by 222 Rn emanation, the high resulting<br />

efficiency, and the ultralow background of Quantulus 1220<br />

result in an extremely low MDA (0.29 Bq kg -1 ) for samples as<br />

low as 250 mg, a typical amount used when analyzing 210 Pb by<br />

R spectrometry. 10 Although both MDA are very low, and<br />

therefore any of the windows can be chosen, the larger<br />

efficiency (and therefore precision of measurements for the<br />

same counting time) favors the use of the largest window,<br />

which is the recommended value in this work. From a

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!