13.01.2013 Views

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 17: Ten FAQs about <strong>Wireless</strong> <strong>Home</strong> Networks<br />

The bottom line is that 802.11n is not only a safe recommendation but also a<br />

good one. Although it’s far from perfect (the state <strong>of</strong> the art always moves forward),<br />

802.11n provides a combination <strong>of</strong> range, compatibility, and speed<br />

that makes it good enough for most people. You are not going to find more<br />

speed or range than 802.11n draft 2 systems <strong>of</strong>fer.<br />

Q: Should I consider buying one <strong>of</strong> the enhanced 802.11g (Turbo,<br />

MIMO, or Pre-N) systems rather than standard 802.11n?<br />

Before the current draft 2 802.11n systems hit the market in 2007, most<br />

manufacturers launched Wi-Fi products that were faster (and longer range)<br />

than standard 802.11g systems and used proprietary (meaning not standardsbased)<br />

variations <strong>of</strong> 802.11g. These systems are <strong>of</strong>ten labeled with marketing<br />

terms such as Turbo, MIMO, or something similar (every manufacturer uses<br />

a different term) that indicates these are 802.11g routers on steroids.<br />

We’ve used a number <strong>of</strong> these systems, and for the most part they work<br />

well, when they are used in a network <strong>of</strong> the same equipment. In other words,<br />

these systems work well in a network in which everything (routers, adapters,<br />

and so on) is from that same manufacturer using the same proprietary<br />

technology. These systems also work fine with standard 802.11g (or even<br />

802.11b) equipment, but the full range and speed benefits are realized only<br />

in a homogeneous network.<br />

Our only problem with these systems comes into play when we look forward.<br />

802.11n systems are now on the marketplace, <strong>of</strong>fering similar or greater<br />

speed and range benefits, and these benefits will work with any other 802.11n<br />

certified gear, from any manufacturer. So if you choose an 802.11n system<br />

instead <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> these proprietary systems, and then buy a new laptop next<br />

year (with built-in 802.11n), you’ll be able to get the extra speed and range<br />

on that laptop without buying any extra equipment (which may or may not<br />

be available at that point).<br />

We think that manufacturers are still selling enhanced 802.11g gear mainly to<br />

continue supporting customers who’ve invested in these technologies over<br />

the past few years. If you’re building a new network, it makes a lot <strong>of</strong> sense to<br />

invest the small extra amount in an 802.11n system instead <strong>of</strong> in one <strong>of</strong> these<br />

older systems.<br />

Q: I can connect to the Internet by using an Ethernet cable but<br />

not by using my wireless LAN. What am I doing wrong?<br />

You’re almost there. The fact that everything works for one configuration but<br />

not for another rules out many problems. As long as your AP and router are<br />

the same device (which is most common), you know that the AP can talk to<br />

your Internet gateway (whether it’s your cable modem, digital subscriber<br />

line [DSL] modem, or dial-up routers, for example). You know that because,<br />

when you’re connected via Ethernet, there’s no problem. The problem is then<br />

relegated to being between the AP and the client on the PC.<br />

319

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!