13.01.2013 Views

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

Wireless Home Networking - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

WPA2. While we prefer WPA2, WPA is more than adequate as far as network<br />

security goes — we strongly recommend you skip over systems that only<br />

support WEP.<br />

Wondering about 802.11n? As we write, most <strong>of</strong> the IP cameras are still 802.11g<br />

or b, but some n-based devices are coming on the market. SmartVue’s S4<br />

product line (www.smartvue.com) sports an 802.11n chipset, but is pricey —<br />

each pr<strong>of</strong>essional grade camera retails at around $1,300. Over time, everyone<br />

will move to 802.11n — it just makes sense.<br />

The wireless communication doesn’t have to be all 802.11 based, although we<br />

would argue that it makes sense to use standards-based gear whenever you<br />

can. Danny likes his X10 FloodCam (www.x10.com, $99), which videotapes<br />

all activity around the house, night and day, and sends the color images<br />

to a VCR or PC. That system uses 2.4 GHz to send the signals, but it’s not<br />

standardized wireless LAN traffic. We believe that over time, many <strong>of</strong> these<br />

systems will move to 802.11 or Bluetooth as chip and licensing costs<br />

continue to come down.<br />

Controlling Your <strong>Home</strong> over<br />

Your <strong>Wireless</strong> LAN<br />

Chapter 14: Other Cool Things You Can Network<br />

Another area <strong>of</strong> wireless activity is home control. If you got excited about<br />

going from the six remote controls on your TV set to one universal remote<br />

control, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. (And if you still have those six remote<br />

controls, we have some options for you, too.)<br />

The problem with controlling anything remotely is having an agreed-on<br />

protocol between the transmitter and receiver. In the infrared (IR) space,<br />

strong agreement and standardization exist among all the different manufacturers<br />

<strong>of</strong> remote controls, so the concept <strong>of</strong> universal remote control is<br />

possible for IR. (IR remotes are the standard for the majority <strong>of</strong> home audio<br />

and video equipment.) But there has not been the same rallying around a<br />

particular format in the radio frequency (RF) space, thus making it difficult<br />

to consolidate control devices except within the same manufacturer’s line.<br />

And then you have issues <strong>of</strong> controlling nonentertainment devices, such as<br />

heating and air-conditioning and security systems. Those have different<br />

requirements just from a user interface perspective.<br />

The advent <strong>of</strong> 802.11 technologies, ZigBee, Z-Wave, and Bluetooth — as<br />

well as touchscreen LCDs and programmable handheld devices — <strong>of</strong>fers the<br />

opportunity to change this situation because, at the least, manufacturers can<br />

agree on the physical transport layer <strong>of</strong> the signal and a common operating<br />

system and platform. We’re now starting to see the first moves toward<br />

collapsing control <strong>of</strong> various home functions to a few form factors and<br />

standards. We talk about these topics throughout this section.<br />

275

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!