13.01.2013 Views

omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening

omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening

omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5:00 pm Wednesday, February 4 High Throughput <strong>Screening</strong> – Data Analysis <strong>and</strong> QC Room A2<br />

John Elling<br />

Datect, LLC<br />

2935 Rodeo Park Drive East<br />

Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505<br />

elling@datect.com<br />

Finding <strong>and</strong> Correcting Systematic Bias in Array Experiments<br />

66<br />

Co-Author(s)<br />

Brian P. Kelley<br />

Whitehead Institute<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e the results of array experiments can be analyzed, the measurements need to be validated, normalized,<br />

<strong>and</strong> possibly modified <strong>and</strong> corrected. The Whitehead Institute has shown that frequency analysis can be used to<br />

detect nonr<strong>and</strong>om spatial correlations in arrays of data that is expected to be r<strong>and</strong>om. This technology can be<br />

used to find systematic errors in data from microtiter plates <strong>and</strong> microarrays that may otherwise be overlooked<br />

when their patterns are obscured by the experimental signal or r<strong>and</strong>om noise. When a systematic error occurs<br />

in arrays that may also have legitimate correlated experimental responses, the spatial correlations are overlaid.<br />

Similarly, the effect of multiple systematic errors will be superimposed to create the observed spatial correlation.<br />

We have developed techniques to detect <strong>and</strong> discriminate multiple systematic biases that occur together in array<br />

data. With this capability, the software can be set up to ignore the acceptable correlations in the data while alerting<br />

the scientist to the appearance of unexpected <strong>and</strong> potentially problematic correlations. Identifying the source of<br />

a systematic spatial error can be used by scientists to both debug the experiment <strong>and</strong> to select an approach to<br />

normalizing the bias to correct the error.<br />

8:00 am Thursday, February 5 High Throughput <strong>Screening</strong> – Automated Design Room A2<br />

Larry DeLucas<br />

University of Alabama at Birmingham<br />

CBSE 206, 1530 3rd Avenue South<br />

Birmingham, Alabama 35294-4400<br />

delucas@cbse.uab.edu<br />

Efficient Protein Crystallization<br />

Co-Author(s)<br />

Terry Bray, Lisa Nagy, Debbie McCombs<br />

University of Alabama at Birmingham<br />

David Hamrick, Larry Cosenza,<br />

Diversified Scientific, Inc.<br />

Alex<strong>and</strong>er Belgoviskiy, Brad Stoops, Arnon Chait<br />

ANALIZA, Inc.<br />

The high throughput production of diffraction-quality crystals remains a major obstacle in structural proteomics,<br />

with success rates rarely exceeding 15% <strong>for</strong> soluble proteins. The Center <strong>for</strong> Biophysical Sciences <strong>and</strong><br />

Engineering, Diversified Scientific, Inc., <strong>and</strong> ANALIZA, Inc. present a unique <strong>and</strong> powerful approach <strong>for</strong> rapidly<br />

<strong>and</strong> efficiently determining optimum protein crystallization conditions. This involves the combination of three<br />

key technologies: (1) automated nano-crystallization, (2) incomplete factorial screening, <strong>and</strong> (3) a specifically<br />

designed neural net crystallization prediction program. This approach demonstrates promise <strong>for</strong> optimizing protein<br />

crystallization when combined with balanced sampling of crystallization space. This is accomplished using an<br />

incomplete factorial screen <strong>and</strong> a uniquely designed nano-crystallization system. Every crystallization trial outcome,<br />

including failures, is used to train the neural network. The self-organizing <strong>and</strong> predictive nature of the neural<br />

network allows <strong>for</strong> accurate prediction of previously untested crystallization conditions, even in the presence of<br />

noise. If properly trained, the neural network can be used to recognize important patterns of crystallization. This<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation allows the neural net to predict non-sampled complete factorial conditions used <strong>for</strong> optimization. Thus,<br />

it predicts the conditions that produce crystals from the entire “crystallization space” of possible experimental<br />

conditions, based upon results from a much smaller number of actual experiments per<strong>for</strong>med. There<strong>for</strong>e, a virtual<br />

screen can be per<strong>for</strong>med using all possible combinations of components <strong>and</strong> variables. The top 50 scores <strong>for</strong> the<br />

predictive crystallization conditions are then experimentally prepared to determine/verify optimum crystallization<br />

conditions. Results from a statistically relevant protein sample number will be presented.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!