omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening
omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening
omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
5:00 pm Wednesday, February 4 High Throughput <strong>Screening</strong> – Data Analysis <strong>and</strong> QC Room A2<br />
John Elling<br />
Datect, LLC<br />
2935 Rodeo Park Drive East<br />
Santa Fe, New Mexico 87505<br />
elling@datect.com<br />
Finding <strong>and</strong> Correcting Systematic Bias in Array Experiments<br />
66<br />
Co-Author(s)<br />
Brian P. Kelley<br />
Whitehead Institute<br />
Be<strong>for</strong>e the results of array experiments can be analyzed, the measurements need to be validated, normalized,<br />
<strong>and</strong> possibly modified <strong>and</strong> corrected. The Whitehead Institute has shown that frequency analysis can be used to<br />
detect nonr<strong>and</strong>om spatial correlations in arrays of data that is expected to be r<strong>and</strong>om. This technology can be<br />
used to find systematic errors in data from microtiter plates <strong>and</strong> microarrays that may otherwise be overlooked<br />
when their patterns are obscured by the experimental signal or r<strong>and</strong>om noise. When a systematic error occurs<br />
in arrays that may also have legitimate correlated experimental responses, the spatial correlations are overlaid.<br />
Similarly, the effect of multiple systematic errors will be superimposed to create the observed spatial correlation.<br />
We have developed techniques to detect <strong>and</strong> discriminate multiple systematic biases that occur together in array<br />
data. With this capability, the software can be set up to ignore the acceptable correlations in the data while alerting<br />
the scientist to the appearance of unexpected <strong>and</strong> potentially problematic correlations. Identifying the source of<br />
a systematic spatial error can be used by scientists to both debug the experiment <strong>and</strong> to select an approach to<br />
normalizing the bias to correct the error.<br />
8:00 am Thursday, February 5 High Throughput <strong>Screening</strong> – Automated Design Room A2<br />
Larry DeLucas<br />
University of Alabama at Birmingham<br />
CBSE 206, 1530 3rd Avenue South<br />
Birmingham, Alabama 35294-4400<br />
delucas@cbse.uab.edu<br />
Efficient Protein Crystallization<br />
Co-Author(s)<br />
Terry Bray, Lisa Nagy, Debbie McCombs<br />
University of Alabama at Birmingham<br />
David Hamrick, Larry Cosenza,<br />
Diversified Scientific, Inc.<br />
Alex<strong>and</strong>er Belgoviskiy, Brad Stoops, Arnon Chait<br />
ANALIZA, Inc.<br />
The high throughput production of diffraction-quality crystals remains a major obstacle in structural proteomics,<br />
with success rates rarely exceeding 15% <strong>for</strong> soluble proteins. The Center <strong>for</strong> Biophysical Sciences <strong>and</strong><br />
Engineering, Diversified Scientific, Inc., <strong>and</strong> ANALIZA, Inc. present a unique <strong>and</strong> powerful approach <strong>for</strong> rapidly<br />
<strong>and</strong> efficiently determining optimum protein crystallization conditions. This involves the combination of three<br />
key technologies: (1) automated nano-crystallization, (2) incomplete factorial screening, <strong>and</strong> (3) a specifically<br />
designed neural net crystallization prediction program. This approach demonstrates promise <strong>for</strong> optimizing protein<br />
crystallization when combined with balanced sampling of crystallization space. This is accomplished using an<br />
incomplete factorial screen <strong>and</strong> a uniquely designed nano-crystallization system. Every crystallization trial outcome,<br />
including failures, is used to train the neural network. The self-organizing <strong>and</strong> predictive nature of the neural<br />
network allows <strong>for</strong> accurate prediction of previously untested crystallization conditions, even in the presence of<br />
noise. If properly trained, the neural network can be used to recognize important patterns of crystallization. This<br />
in<strong>for</strong>mation allows the neural net to predict non-sampled complete factorial conditions used <strong>for</strong> optimization. Thus,<br />
it predicts the conditions that produce crystals from the entire “crystallization space” of possible experimental<br />
conditions, based upon results from a much smaller number of actual experiments per<strong>for</strong>med. There<strong>for</strong>e, a virtual<br />
screen can be per<strong>for</strong>med using all possible combinations of components <strong>and</strong> variables. The top 50 scores <strong>for</strong> the<br />
predictive crystallization conditions are then experimentally prepared to determine/verify optimum crystallization<br />
conditions. Results from a statistically relevant protein sample number will be presented.