omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening
omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening omation mbers - Society for Laboratory Automation and Screening
3:30 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Automation Systems Room A3 Bruce Seligmann High Throughput Genomics, Inc. 6296 E. Grant Road Tucson, Arizonia 85712 bseligmann@htgenomics.com The ArrayPlate: A Novel, High Throughput, Multiplexed, mRNA Assay for Toxicological Research and Development High Throughput Genomics (HTG) has developed an easy-to-implement, industrial scale gene expression assay in a two-stage microplate multiplexed array format that eliminates the need for RNA extraction, purification, and amplification. The assay produces sensitive, reproducible, repeatable from day-to-day, and lab-to-lab, quantitative gene expression data with CV’s in the range of 10 percent or less. Utilizing transcriptomics technology, toxicologists can now overcome some of the problems with studying gene expression using chip or amplification technologies, particularly when analyzing in vivo animal studies. HTG’s ArrayPlate, when compared with current chip technologies, allows toxicologists to examine small gene expression changes and develop a highly reproducible pattern of gene expression that may indicate a toxic event and assemble highly accurate dose/ response curves. The technology’s multiplexed gene expression capability makes the assay a high throughput screening tool that can be deployed in early stage drug development and compound screening efforts. No RNA purification or sample amplification is necessary to obtain excellent data making the ArrayPlate a highly cost effective platform for compound testing. Thousands of samples can be analyzed in one week. HTG’s technology is currently in use by pharmaceutical companies (such as Johnson & Johnson, Celgene) in research and development, discovery, toxicology, metabolism, diagnostics, clinical trial monitoring, and many other life science applications. 3:45 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Automation Systems Room A3 David Huber Stanford University Building 500 Stanford, California 94305-3030 david.huber@stanford.edu Temperature Gradient Focusing, Modeling and Experiments 132 Co-Author(s) Juan G. Santiago A key challenge yet to be addressed by miniaturized bioanalytical devices is the detection of analytes with nanomolar or lower initial concentrations in volumes of order one microliter or less. Temperature gradient focusing (TGF) is an emerging analytical technology that simultaneously concentrates and separates charged species according to their electrophoretic mobilities. In TGF, an axial temperature gradient is applied along an electrophoretic channel. Within the channel, the local electric field is inversely proportional to conductivity, which in turn is a function of local viscosity and ion density. By selecting a buffer with a temperature dependent conductivity, we create an electric field gradient that causes a decrease in electrophoretic mass flux along one direction in the channel. We then impose a net bulk flow in the opposite direction. Species in the system focus at points where the local, area-averaged liquid velocity and electrophoretic velocity sum to zero. Dispersion in TGF results from a combination of molecular diffusion and advective dispersion. Advective dispersion, the dominant component, is caused by both externally-imposed and internally-generated pressure gradients. We leverage a dispersion model similar to classical Taylor dispersion analysis to produce a one-dimensional convective diffusion equation in terms of an axially-dependent dispersion coefficient. In this work, we compare the dispersion model with results from our temperature gradient flow system and characterize the focusing and dispersion behavior. The goal of the study is to determine optimal parameters for TGF focusing and separation.
4:00 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Automation Systems Room A3 Sanjaya Joshi Userspace Corporation 11118 NE 141 Place Kirkland, Washington 98034 sanjay@userspace.com An Automated Flow Cytometry Quality Protocol and Workflow System for Managing Instruments, Samples, and Data 133 Co-Author(s) Michael R. Loken Hematologics, Inc. Flow Cytometry is gaining significance outside the research laboratory as a high-resolution clinical tool for the detection, classification, staging, and recurrence of Hematologic neoplasms. Intensity relationships between antigens is proving to be an important discriminator of normal and aberrant hematopoietic cells. Userspace Corporation and HematoLogics, Inc. have been collaborating to create a web-service based real-time workflow system combined with a unique performance assessment for the instrument calibration based on invariant biological markers. A high resolution instrument validation protocol can be established using lymphocyte CD4 fluorescence intensity. In a study of normal adult blood using these QC procedures, the intensity of CD4 on lymphocytes was found to be essentially invariant for 21 individuals assayed on the two instruments collected over a period of 8 months. These results demonstrate that in a data space with a dynamic range of 4 decades, the biological variation of the mean intensity from individual to individual for this one antigen is less than the variability of expression within the individual. The biological expression of this antigen becomes an independent biological standard. This QC procedure is a rapid means of assessing instrument performance. This quality program combined with the tracking and audit of samples and patient records securely in real-time allows both clinical laboratories and research laboratories conducting clinical trials to remotely track and analyze the FCS data format (converted into XML for data stream based interpretation, analysis and report generation). Templates can be built around this system for various quality and regulatory standards. 4:15 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Automation Systems Room A3 Emir Osmanagic Scinomix 4069 Wedgeway Court Earth City, Missouri 63045 eosmanagic@scinomix.com Vertical Integration Platform Co-Author(s) Russell Leeker Traditionally, companies have designed laboratory automation systems to operate with few significant changes during assay production. The inflexibility of this approach is the primary reason companies are supporting development of more versatile systems. The Vertical Laboratory Integration Platform (VIP) is a framework for distributed modular automation for laboratory processes. Modularity of the components, highly flexible product transport mechanisms, and a high level of distributed intelligence are key characteristics of the VIP. Laboratories can realize an excellent return on investment through the VIP’s ability to adapt to the quick and rapid changes of lab processes. The first version of the VIP has been developed for Cell-Based Assays incorporating incubation, liquid handling, washing and plate sealing on plug-and-play shelves under environmental controlled conditions. The system transports any height SBS standard footprint plates to and from instruments in a vertical configuration, saving valuable laboratory space. When a process changes and an additional or different instrument is required a plug and play shelf can be removed and reconfigured then plugged back into the VIP framework. PODIUM ABSTRACTS
- Page 84 and 85: 3:00 pm Tuesday, February 3 Proteom
- Page 86 and 87: 8:00 am Wednesday, February 4 Prote
- Page 88 and 89: 10:30 am Wednesday, February 4 Prot
- Page 90 and 91: 3:30 pm Wednesday, February 4 Prote
- Page 92 and 93: 8:00 am Thursday, February 5 Proteo
- Page 94 and 95: 10:30 am Thursday, February 5 Prote
- Page 96 and 97: 2:00 pm Thursday, February 5 Automa
- Page 98 and 99: 3:30 pm Tuesday, February 3 Genomic
- Page 100 and 101: 8:30 am Wednesday, February 4 Genom
- Page 102 and 103: 11:00 am Wednesday, February 4 Geno
- Page 104 and 105: 4:00 pm Wednesday, February 4 Genom
- Page 106 and 107: 8:30 am Thursday, February 5 Genomi
- Page 108 and 109: 11:00 am Thursday, February 5 Genom
- Page 110 and 111: 3:00 pm Tuesday, February 3 Clinica
- Page 112 and 113: 8:00 am Wednesday, February 4 Clini
- Page 114 and 115: 10:30 am Wednesday, February 4 Clin
- Page 116 and 117: 3:30 pm Wednesday, February 4 Clini
- Page 118 and 119: 8:00 am Thursday, February 5 Clinic
- Page 120 and 121: 10:30 am Thursday, February 5 Clini
- Page 122 and 123: 2:00 pm Thursday, February 5 Clinic
- Page 124 and 125: 3:00 pm Tuesday, February 3 Emergin
- Page 126 and 127: 8:00 am Wednesday, February 4 Emerg
- Page 128 and 129: 9:00 am Wednesday, February 4 Emerg
- Page 130 and 131: 10:30 am Wednesday, February 4 Emer
- Page 132 and 133: 11:30 am Wednesday, February 4 Emer
- Page 136 and 137: 4:30 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerg
- Page 138 and 139: 8:00 am Thursday, February 5 Emergi
- Page 140 and 141: 9:00 am Thursday, February 5 Emergi
- Page 142 and 143: 11:30 am Thursday, February 5 Emerg
- Page 144 and 145: 2:30 pm Thursday, February 5 Emergi
- Page 146 and 147: NOTES 144
- Page 148 and 149: TP001 Thor Anders Aarhaug SINTEF Ma
- Page 150 and 151: TP005 Alex Berhitu Spark Holland, I
- Page 152 and 153: TP009 Stefan Betz Kendro Laboratory
- Page 154 and 155: TP013 Christine Brideau Merck Fross
- Page 156 and 157: TP017 Madhu Prakash Chatrathi New M
- Page 158 and 159: TP021 Cristopher Cowan Promega Corp
- Page 160 and 161: TP025 James Dixon North Carolina St
- Page 162 and 163: TP029 Wayne Duncan Agilent Technolo
- Page 164 and 165: TP033 Xingwang Fang Ambion, Inc. Re
- Page 166 and 167: TP037 Alice Gao Corning Incorporate
- Page 168 and 169: TP041 Joseph Granchelli NalgeNunc I
- Page 170 and 171: TP045 Jennifer Halcome Eppendorf-5
- Page 172 and 173: TP049 Darren Hillegonds Lawrence Li
- Page 174 and 175: TP052 Dawn Marie Jacobson Veterans
- Page 176 and 177: TP056 Joseph Machamer Molecular Dev
- Page 178 and 179: TP060 Gwendolyn M. Motz The Univers
- Page 180 and 181: TP064 Dominik Poetz National Instit
- Page 182 and 183: TP068 Kirby Reed Gilson, Inc. Appli
3:30 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Aut<strong>omation</strong> Systems Room A3<br />
Bruce Seligmann<br />
High Throughput Genomics, Inc.<br />
6296 E. Grant Road<br />
Tucson, Arizonia 85712<br />
bseligmann@htgenomics.com<br />
The ArrayPlate: A Novel, High Throughput, Multiplexed, mRNA Assay <strong>for</strong> Toxicological<br />
Research <strong>and</strong> Development<br />
High Throughput Genomics (HTG) has developed an easy-to-implement, industrial scale gene expression assay<br />
in a two-stage microplate multiplexed array <strong>for</strong>mat that eliminates the need <strong>for</strong> RNA extraction, purification,<br />
<strong>and</strong> amplification. The assay produces sensitive, reproducible, repeatable from day-to-day, <strong>and</strong> lab-to-lab,<br />
quantitative gene expression data with CV’s in the range of 10 percent or less. Utilizing transcriptomics technology,<br />
toxicologists can now overcome some of the problems with studying gene expression using chip or amplification<br />
technologies, particularly when analyzing in vivo animal studies. HTG’s ArrayPlate, when compared with<br />
current chip technologies, allows toxicologists to examine small gene expression changes <strong>and</strong> develop a highly<br />
reproducible pattern of gene expression that may indicate a toxic event <strong>and</strong> assemble highly accurate dose/<br />
response curves. The technology’s multiplexed gene expression capability makes the assay a high throughput<br />
screening tool that can be deployed in early stage drug development <strong>and</strong> compound screening ef<strong>for</strong>ts. No RNA<br />
purification or sample amplification is necessary to obtain excellent data making the ArrayPlate a highly cost<br />
effective plat<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> compound testing. Thous<strong>and</strong>s of samples can be analyzed in one week. HTG’s technology<br />
is currently in use by pharmaceutical companies (such as Johnson & Johnson, Celgene) in research <strong>and</strong><br />
development, discovery, toxicology, metabolism, diagnostics, clinical trial monitoring, <strong>and</strong> many other life science<br />
applications.<br />
3:45 pm Wednesday, February 4 Emerging Technologies – Aut<strong>omation</strong> Systems Room A3<br />
David Huber<br />
Stan<strong>for</strong>d University<br />
Building 500<br />
Stan<strong>for</strong>d, Cali<strong>for</strong>nia 94305-3030<br />
david.huber@stan<strong>for</strong>d.edu<br />
Temperature Gradient Focusing, Modeling <strong>and</strong> Experiments<br />
132<br />
Co-Author(s)<br />
Juan G. Santiago<br />
A key challenge yet to be addressed by miniaturized bioanalytical devices is the detection of analytes with<br />
nanomolar or lower initial concentrations in volumes of order one microliter or less. Temperature gradient<br />
focusing (TGF) is an emerging analytical technology that simultaneously concentrates <strong>and</strong> separates charged<br />
species according to their electrophoretic mobilities. In TGF, an axial temperature gradient is applied along<br />
an electrophoretic channel. Within the channel, the local electric field is inversely proportional to conductivity,<br />
which in turn is a function of local viscosity <strong>and</strong> ion density. By selecting a buffer with a temperature dependent<br />
conductivity, we create an electric field gradient that causes a decrease in electrophoretic mass flux along one<br />
direction in the channel. We then impose a net bulk flow in the opposite direction. Species in the system focus at<br />
points where the local, area-averaged liquid velocity <strong>and</strong> electrophoretic velocity sum to zero. Dispersion in TGF<br />
results from a combination of molecular diffusion <strong>and</strong> advective dispersion. Advective dispersion, the dominant<br />
component, is caused by both externally-imposed <strong>and</strong> internally-generated pressure gradients. We leverage a<br />
dispersion model similar to classical Taylor dispersion analysis to produce a one-dimensional convective diffusion<br />
equation in terms of an axially-dependent dispersion coefficient. In this work, we compare the dispersion model<br />
with results from our temperature gradient flow system <strong>and</strong> characterize the focusing <strong>and</strong> dispersion behavior. The<br />
goal of the study is to determine optimal parameters <strong>for</strong> TGF focusing <strong>and</strong> separation.