13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

deer mice fed only on plants growing in the UCL metal concentrations areas<br />

deer mice consumed soil equivalent to 2 percent of their plant ingestion rate<br />

deer mice drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled plant metal concentrations were accurate<br />

Table 7.2.4-9 shows that there is no risk to deer mice b m the consumption of plants growing at even the<br />

worst case locations. Therefore, there is no need to conduct further analyses of risk to this ROC.<br />

- Mink<br />

Hazard quotients for mink feeding on small mammals (Table 7.2.4-IOA) were calculated by diving the<br />

doses estimated in Table 7.2.3-14 by the TRVs in Table 7.2.3-4B. The default assumptions were:<br />

mink feed only on small mammals from locations where soil samples were collected<br />

mink feed only on small mammals found in the highest metal concentrations areas<br />

mink drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled small mammal metal concentrations were accurate<br />

Table 7.2.4-10A shows that mink feeding on small insectivorous mammals could be at risk from cadmium<br />

in the subsurface tailings piles, and the lagoon.<br />

Since mink are not restricted to feeding in only the worst case locations, risk was further characterized at<br />

median metals concentrations in small mammals. When mink were exposed to small mammals living on<br />

median subsurface soil concentrations there was no risk from the subsurface tailings (Table 7.2.4-IOB).<br />

However, because of the limited data for the lagoon and maintenance yard soils, it was not possible to<br />

further estimate risk in these areas. It should be noted however, that since the soils are probably toxic to<br />

plants and earthworms, it is likely that there is not a complete exposure pathways from small mammals to<br />

mink in these areas. Furthermore, since carnivorous animals are usually only about 10 percent as abundant<br />

and as herbivores, it is also unlikely that mink could feed 100 percent on insectivores. When the mink diet<br />

is 10 percent insectivores and 90 percent herbivores (or omnivores), there is no risk to mink even in the<br />

lagoon and maintenance yard.<br />

Red-Tailed Hawk<br />

Hazard quotients for red-tailed hawk feeding on small mammals (Table 7.2.4-1 1) were calculated by<br />

dividing the doses estimated in Table 7.2.3-16 by the TRVs in Table 7.2.3-4A. The default assumptions<br />

were:<br />

hawks feed only on small mammals from locations where soil samples were collected<br />

hawks feed only on small mammals found in the highest metal concentrations areas<br />

hawks drink only the UCL concentrations from Railroad Creek<br />

the modeled small mammal metal concentrations were accurate<br />

G:\~W)~ruUIoldco-2\n17QQdoc 7-68<br />

17693-00J-019Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5: 16 PWRAFT FINAL R1 REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!