13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.2.2.6 Conceptual Site Model<br />

The CSM integrates sources, release mechanisms. transpon media, transfer mechanisms, and complete<br />

receptor exposure pathways. For this Baseline ERA, three relatively distinct exposure sources form the<br />

bases of the CSM. These sources are: 1) surface water and sediments, 2) tailings soils, and 3) seep water.<br />

The ecological CSM for this site (Figure 7.2-1) provides a pictorial representation of the pathways of<br />

potential PCOC movement h m primary sources to secondary, and tertiary sources and receptors. It is<br />

these relationships that drive potential environmental and exposure risks, as well as risk management<br />

decision making.<br />

7.23 Analysis<br />

7.23.1 Assessment and Measurement Endpoints<br />

Definitions of endpoints and methods of endpoint selection generally follow the guidance and draft<br />

guidance provided by EPA (1989, 1994). To determine if adverse impacts have occurred or are occurring as<br />

a result of constituents released by past mining activities, it is necessary to determine which assessment<br />

endpoints will be used in the evaluation and to understand how the various measurement endpoints relate to<br />

the assessment endpoints in the overall weight-of-evidence approach adopted herein.<br />

The process of endpoint selection begins with identification of risk management goals for environmental<br />

components and ROC that may be susceptible to chemical substances in the environment. In general. the<br />

goal for this site is to protect the populations, communities, and ecosystems that may be exposed to site-<br />

related PCOCs.<br />

Assessment Endpoints<br />

Assessment endpoints are general, large-scale expressions of environmental components or characteristics<br />

. that may be at risk and, therefore, require protection. Although related and highly interdependent,<br />

measurement and assessment endpoints are not the same. In general, measurement endpoints are actual<br />

measurements of chemical or biological parameters that are used to evaluate the assessment endpoints. This<br />

evaluation then forms the basis for extrapolation of results to higher levels of organization or complexity.<br />

The assessment endpoints identified for this investigation are:<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of avian carnivores<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of terrestrial mammals<br />

Decline in health and viability of populations of fish and other aquatic receptors<br />

These assessment endpoints are evaluated specifically with information obtained fiom measurement<br />

endpoints (below) to determine if reduced survival, impaired reproduction, or growth inhibition in local<br />

populations and communities are likely. The assessment endpoints were evaluated as the no observed<br />

adverse effect level (NOAEL) fiom toxicity benchmarks, guidelines, or toxicity reference values (TRVs)<br />

for endpoints having potential effects on populations (i.e., growth, reproduction, development) of plants<br />

or animals.<br />

G:\~UY)~\hoIdcn-2\n\7QQdoc<br />

17693-00501 Wuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!