Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service
Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service
Lead was present in the maintenance yard and lagoon area soil at concentrations exceeding MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A and USEPA guidelines for residential sites, the exposure times expected at the site are significantly less than the assumed residential exposure time upon which the guidelines are based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in soil in these two areas are not expected to cause effects in exposed populations. Total petroleum hydrocarbons were present in soil at the maintenance yard and lagoon area at levels exceeding MTCA Method A level. Because no toxicity criteria exist for these complex mixtures. site- specific risks were not evaluated. However, as with lead, exposure times and durations in these areas are expected to be significantly lower than would be assumed for development of the Method A level. and therefore TPH is soil at these locations is not expected to be of concern for the limited time period that maintenance workers and recreational users are exposed populations. In addition, remedial actions in these areas should significantly reduce soil TPH concentrations. 7.1.5.2 Sediment Sediment sample results were divided into four.areas based on physical location, as follows: 1) Railroad Creek adjacent to the Site, 2) Railroad Creek downgradient of the Site, 3) Copper Creek, and 4) Copper Creek diversion. Constituents exceeding screening criteria in the four areas were selected as IHSs and evaluated in the site-specific risk assessment. Cancer risks and noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotient. Cancer risks ranged from 1.08 x lv7 for beryllium in all three areas to 4.72 x lo4 for arsenic in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. The hazard quotients ranged from 6.25 x 10" for beryllium in all four areas to 1.68 x 10" for molybdenum in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. 7.1.53 Air Based on historical air monitoring data, the only constituent selected as an IHS for air during the screening process was manganese. The site-specific hazard quotient calculated for manganese in air was 4.0 x lV1, which is below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen. In order to evaluate current conditions and the potential for soiVtailings in each exposure area to be transported to air via fugitive dust emissions, a simple USEPA model was utilized to develop a particulate emission factor (PEF) for each exposure area. Each exposure area was then screened using conservative cleanup criteria calculated from the PEF. Screening of constituent concentrations resulted in the elimination of the vegetable garden, baseball field. wilderness area, maintenance yard, and tailings as areas of concern. Constituents exceeding screening criteria in the remaining three surface soil areas were selected as IHSs and evaluated in the site-specific risk assessment for transfers to air. Cancer risks based on transfers from soil to air for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotient. Cancer risks ranged from 3.96 x lug for arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x 1 o4 for chromium in Holden village soil (transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this exposure pathway. G:\wpdma\00S~UIoldm2\ni7QQda 17693405419Uuly 27.1999:5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT 7-36 DAMES & MOORE
7.1.5.4 Surface Water and Fish Surface water sample results were divided into three areas based on physical location, as follows: 1) Railroad Creek adjacent to the Site, 2) Railroad Creek downgradient of the Site, and 3) Copper Creek. Screening of constituent concentrations resulted in the elimination of Railroad Creek as an area of concern. Only one constituent (molybdenum) exceeded screening criteria in Copper Creek and was selected as an IHS for surface water and fish. Risks for Copper Creek surface water were evaluated for both incidental ingestion of surface water during recreational activities, and ingestion of fish by sport fishermen. Hazard quotients for molybdenum were 6.44 x 1w2 for ingestion of water and 3.18 x 10" for ingestion of fish. both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen. The findings of no significant risk for ingestion of fish is supported by the data collected in 1989/1991 and 1992 by PNL and Ecology. PNL and Ecology collected fish muscle tissue from three locations in Railroad Creek, including at Lucerne, and from 25-Mile Creek (a reference site south of Lucerne). PNL concluded there were no significant overall locational differences in metal concentrations for muscle tissue, and that results indicated little risk to human health through consumption of trout. Screening of this muscle tissue data against U.S. EPA risk-based concentrations confined that residual metals in edible tissues are well below levels of concern, both at the site and downgradient of the site. (287) 7.1.5.5 Seeps, 1500-Level Main Portal Drainage, and 1500-Level Ventilator Portal Seepage Seep, 1500-level main portal drainage and 1500-level ventilator portal seepage data were evaluated separately. No constituents were selected as IHSs for ventilator portal drainage. Constituents exceeding screening criteria in seeps and mine portal drainage were selected as IHSs and evaluated in the site-specific risk assessment. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 1 c2 for manganese in the 1500-level main drainage to 5.2 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage. Lead w& present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist. for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and 1500-level main portal drainage are not expected to cause effects in potentially exposed populations. 7.1.5.6 Sauna Dipping Pool (Copper Creek Diversion) Risks associated with the sauna dipping pool were evaluated by screening water from the Copper Creek diversion against drinking water criteria. No constituents detected in the Copper Creek diversion exceeded screening criteria and therefore this route of exposure was eliminated from further evaluation. 7.1.5.7 Groundwater . Groundwater at the site is not considered useable for drinking water purposes and therefore was not screened for exceedances of drinking water criteria. Groundwater collected at the Lucerne USFS well was G:\~W)~U,aldm-Z\ri\7-O.doc 7-3 7 17693005019Uuly 27. 1999.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT
- Page 857 and 858: 0 Acidity Addition Water Runon end
- Page 859: SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
- Page 862 and 863: In~Vtratim to Grwndwater . Base of
- Page 864: Note: Some flow lost into plane of
- Page 868: Approximate Scale in Feet SOURCE: O
- Page 871 and 872: SOURCE: SRK 1 L 'i +- Holden P-5 (B
- Page 873 and 874: 7.0 BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Both a
- Page 875 and 876: 7.1.1.2 Site-Specific Human Health
- Page 877 and 878: Surface Water Historic and 1997-199
- Page 879 and 880: environment. IHSs were selected for
- Page 881 and 882: Railroad Creek can be utilized by v
- Page 883 and 884: Exposure Routes expected to be redu
- Page 885 and 886: and the USFS guard station. Holden
- Page 887 and 888: No Method A levels are available fo
- Page 889 and 890: 7.133 Screening Level Evaluation of
- Page 891 and 892: they are not expected to present an
- Page 893 and 894: Sediment Railroad Creek and Site Hi
- Page 895 and 896: the ventilator portal drainage is n
- Page 897 and 898: are based on different mechanistic
- Page 899 and 900: Selection of.Target Risk and Hazard
- Page 901 and 902: Noncarcinogens: Inhalation of Air w
- Page 903 and 904: where: PEF = Particulate emission f
- Page 905 and 906: arsenic in the USFS guard station s
- Page 907: Use of toxicity criteria (CPFs and
- Page 911 and 912: identify dismbutions of compounds o
- Page 913 and 914: most abundant species in Railroad C
- Page 915 and 916: mechanisms, PCOCs originating from
- Page 917 and 918: copper, lead, and zinc is shown in
- Page 919 and 920: Measurement Endpoints Measurement e
- Page 921 and 922: to the extrapolation to low hardnes
- Page 923 and 924: concentration that contains the bio
- Page 925 and 926: Lupinus bicolor, and Trijolium praf
- Page 927 and 928: Although certain benthic invertebra
- Page 929 and 930: estimated from the available liver
- Page 931 and 932: of between a low of 34 ha. for does
- Page 933 and 934: Little Brown Bat The little brown b
- Page 935 and 936: Since none of the UCL concentration
- Page 937 and 938: , Hazard quotients for osprey consu
- Page 939 and 940: appropriate metric for protection o
- Page 941 and 942: Table 7.2.4-1 1A shows that red-tai
- Page 943 and 944: 7.2.5 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY Limita
- Page 945 and 946: laboratory studies to field exposur
- Page 947 and 948: I I tailings piles difficult. Likew
- Page 949 and 950: other mine sites where plants &re s
- Page 951 and 952: TABLE 7.0-1 . KEY OF SITE FEATURES
- Page 953 and 954: TABLE 7.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
- Page 955 and 956: TABLE 7.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
- Page 957 and 958: ' TABLE 7.18 STATISTICAL ANALYSJS A
7.1.5.4 Surface Water and Fish<br />
Surface water sample results were divided into three areas based on physical location, as follows:<br />
1) Railroad Creek adjacent to the Site, 2) Railroad Creek downgradient of the Site, and 3) Copper Creek.<br />
Screening of constituent concentrations resulted in the elimination of Railroad Creek as an area of concern.<br />
Only one constituent (molybdenum) exceeded screening criteria in Copper Creek and was selected as an<br />
IHS for surface water and fish. Risks for Copper Creek surface water were evaluated for both incidental<br />
ingestion of surface water during recreational activities, and ingestion of fish by sport fishermen. Hazard<br />
quotients for molybdenum were 6.44 x 1w2 for ingestion of water and 3.18 x 10" for ingestion of fish. both<br />
of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this<br />
media since the IHS was not a carcinogen.<br />
The findings of no significant risk for ingestion of fish is supported by the data collected in 1989/1991<br />
and 1992 by PNL and Ecology. PNL and Ecology collected fish muscle tissue from three locations in<br />
Railroad Creek, including at Lucerne, and from 25-Mile Creek (a reference site south of Lucerne). PNL<br />
concluded there were no significant overall locational differences in metal concentrations for muscle<br />
tissue, and that results indicated little risk to human health through consumption of trout. Screening of<br />
this muscle tissue data against U.S. EPA risk-based concentrations confined that residual metals in<br />
edible tissues are well below levels of concern, both at the site and downgradient of the site. (287)<br />
7.1.5.5 Seeps, 1500-Level Main Portal Drainage, and 1500-Level Ventilator Portal Seepage<br />
Seep, 1500-level main portal drainage and 1500-level ventilator portal seepage data were evaluated<br />
separately. No constituents were selected as IHSs for ventilator portal drainage. Constituents exceeding<br />
screening criteria in seeps and mine portal drainage were selected as IHSs and evaluated in the site-specific<br />
risk assessment. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both media were below the allowable MTCA<br />
hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these media since IHSs were not carcinogens.<br />
The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 1 c2 for manganese in the 1500-level main drainage to 5.2 1 x 10"<br />
for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage.<br />
Lead w& present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the<br />
MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist. for this constituent, site-specific risks<br />
could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure<br />
frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the<br />
cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and 1500-level main portal drainage are<br />
not expected to cause effects in potentially exposed populations.<br />
7.1.5.6 Sauna Dipping Pool (Copper Creek Diversion)<br />
Risks associated with the sauna dipping pool were evaluated by screening water from the Copper Creek<br />
diversion against drinking water criteria. No constituents detected in the Copper Creek diversion exceeded<br />
screening criteria and therefore this route of exposure was eliminated from further evaluation.<br />
7.1.5.7 Groundwater<br />
. Groundwater at the site is not considered useable for drinking water purposes and therefore was not<br />
screened for exceedances of drinking water criteria. Groundwater collected at the Lucerne USFS well was<br />
G:\~W)~U,aldm-Z\ri\7-O.doc 7-3 7<br />
17693005019Uuly 27. <strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT