Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service
Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service
Surface Soil Cancer risks and noncancer hazard quotients ingestion of all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotient. The cancer risks ranged from 8.91 s 10''~ for ber?.lliurn at the USFS guard station to 5.66 x lod for arsenic in the maintenance area. The hazard quotients ranged from 4.1 5 x lod for beryllium at the USFS guard station soil to 2.04 x 10" for copper in the lagoon area soil. Lead was detected in maintenance yard and lagoon area soil at concentrations exceeding the screening criteria (1070 mgkg in the maintenance yard and 620 mgkg in the lagoon area). However. because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. USEPA guidelines recommend a cleanup level of 400 mg/kg for lead in soil at residential sites based on prediction of blood lead levels in children. Neither of these sites is residential and exposure time is expected to be significantly less than an assumed residential exposure duration of 7 day per week exposures for 30 years. The highest exposure concentrations are less than three times higher than the USEPA recommended levels. Therefore, concentrations of lead in soil in these two areas are not expected to cause effects in exposed populations. In addition, remedial actions in these two areas will likely significantly reduce the concentrations present. Total petroleum hydrocarbons were present in soil at the maintenance yard and lagoon area at levels exceeding h4TCA Method A level. Exposure concentrations ranged from 140 mglkg gasoline range hydrocarbons in the maintenance yard to 12,000 mg/kg diesel range hydrocarbons in the maintenance yard. Because no toxicity criteria exist for these complex mixtures, site-specific risks were not evaluated. However, as with lead, exposure times and durations at the maintenance yard and lagoon area are expected to be significantly lower than would be assumed for development of the Method A level, and therefore TPH is soil at these locations are not expected to be of concern for the limited time period that maintenance workers and recreational users are exposed populations. In addition, remedial actions in these areas should significantly reduce soil TPH concentrations. Sediment Cancer risks and noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotients. Cancer risks ranged from 1.08 x 10'~ for beryllium in all three areas to 4.72 x 10" for arsenic in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. The hazard quotients ranged from 6.25 x l O" for beryllium in all three areas to 1.68 x 10" for molybdenum in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. - Air' The site-specific hazard quotients calculated for manganese in air was 4.0 x lo-', which is below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since manganese was not a carcinogen. Particulate Emissions fiom Soil In order to evaluate current conditions and the potential for soiVtailings in each exposure area to be transported to air via fugitive dust emissions, a simple USEPA model was utilized to develop a particulate emission factor (PEF) for each exposure area. Cancer risks based on transfers from soil to air for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk. Cancer risks ranged from 3.96 x lo4 for G\~mW5~\hoIdm-2\ni7-O.da 1769MOS019Uuly 27.199QJ: 16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT
arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x lo4 for chromium in Holden Village soil (transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this pathway. Surface Water and Fish Hazard quotients for molybdenum in Copper Creek were 6.44 x 10.' for ingestion of water and 3.1 8 r 1 0.' for ingestion of fish, both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen. See~s and Mine Portal Drainage Seep and portal drainage data were evaluated separately. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 10.* for manganese in the 1500-level main portal drainage to 5.3 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage. Lead was present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and portal drainage are not expected to cause effects in potentially exposed populations. Cumulative Risk MTCA requires the evaluation of cumulative risk when Method C levels are used. ,Evaluation of cumulative cancer risk was accomplished by summing all cancer risks for each receptor population. Cumulative risk for noncancer effects was evaluated by summing hazard quotients for each IHS associated with the same toxic effect endpoint Cumulative cancer risks for forest service workers (I. I6 x 10.~) are less than the acceptable level of I x 10" (Table 7.1-43). Cumulative cancer risks for village residents/recreational users are 1.10 x 10". Ingestion of soil from the "storage" location in the maintenance yard is the primary contributor to the cumulative risk within the rounding error of 1 x 10". When. adjusted to the appropriate number of significant digits, the cumulative risk is the same as the acceptable level of 1 x 10". In addition, this cum~ilative risk assumes that the children exposed recreationally during the summertime grow up to become residents of Holden Village who work in the maintenance yard. This assumption is obviously extremely conservative. All noncancer hazard quotients are less than the acceptable level of one, with one exception. Using a combination of extremely conservative exposure assumptions that are unlikely to occur resulted in the cumulative hazard quotient for nephrotoxic effects (non-cancer kidney . effects) for village residents/recreational users of 1.26. This is due primarily to cadmium in portal drainage. This cumulative conservative risk evaluation assumes that the receptor ,is daily drinking one-half liter of 1500-level main portal drainage water, one-half liter of seep water, and one-half liter of Copper Creek water, as well as ingesting soil from the lagoon area and maintenance area, ingesting soil, and eating fish caught from onsite areas on exposed days. This combination of exposures is extremely conservative and highly unlikely to occur. The water ingestion rates used in the calculation of Method B criteria assumed that one-half of a G:\~mUXIJ~\holdcn-2\n17-O.doc 7-33 DAMES & MOORE 17693405419Uuly 27.1999.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT
- Page 853 and 854: Date Figure 6.5-5 DAMES & MOORE 199
- Page 855 and 856: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- Page 857 and 858: 0 Acidity Addition Water Runon end
- Page 859: SOURCE: SRK Oxidation limit Mn++ Fe
- Page 862 and 863: In~Vtratim to Grwndwater . Base of
- Page 864: Note: Some flow lost into plane of
- Page 868: Approximate Scale in Feet SOURCE: O
- Page 871 and 872: SOURCE: SRK 1 L 'i +- Holden P-5 (B
- Page 873 and 874: 7.0 BASELINE RISK ASSESSMENT Both a
- Page 875 and 876: 7.1.1.2 Site-Specific Human Health
- Page 877 and 878: Surface Water Historic and 1997-199
- Page 879 and 880: environment. IHSs were selected for
- Page 881 and 882: Railroad Creek can be utilized by v
- Page 883 and 884: Exposure Routes expected to be redu
- Page 885 and 886: and the USFS guard station. Holden
- Page 887 and 888: No Method A levels are available fo
- Page 889 and 890: 7.133 Screening Level Evaluation of
- Page 891 and 892: they are not expected to present an
- Page 893 and 894: Sediment Railroad Creek and Site Hi
- Page 895 and 896: the ventilator portal drainage is n
- Page 897 and 898: are based on different mechanistic
- Page 899 and 900: Selection of.Target Risk and Hazard
- Page 901 and 902: Noncarcinogens: Inhalation of Air w
- Page 903: where: PEF = Particulate emission f
- Page 907 and 908: Use of toxicity criteria (CPFs and
- Page 909 and 910: 7.1.5.4 Surface Water and Fish Surf
- Page 911 and 912: identify dismbutions of compounds o
- Page 913 and 914: most abundant species in Railroad C
- Page 915 and 916: mechanisms, PCOCs originating from
- Page 917 and 918: copper, lead, and zinc is shown in
- Page 919 and 920: Measurement Endpoints Measurement e
- Page 921 and 922: to the extrapolation to low hardnes
- Page 923 and 924: concentration that contains the bio
- Page 925 and 926: Lupinus bicolor, and Trijolium praf
- Page 927 and 928: Although certain benthic invertebra
- Page 929 and 930: estimated from the available liver
- Page 931 and 932: of between a low of 34 ha. for does
- Page 933 and 934: Little Brown Bat The little brown b
- Page 935 and 936: Since none of the UCL concentration
- Page 937 and 938: , Hazard quotients for osprey consu
- Page 939 and 940: appropriate metric for protection o
- Page 941 and 942: Table 7.2.4-1 1A shows that red-tai
- Page 943 and 944: 7.2.5 SOURCES OF UNCERTAINTY Limita
- Page 945 and 946: laboratory studies to field exposur
- Page 947 and 948: I I tailings piles difficult. Likew
- Page 949 and 950: other mine sites where plants &re s
- Page 951 and 952: TABLE 7.0-1 . KEY OF SITE FEATURES
- Page 953 and 954: TABLE 7.0-1 KEY OF SITE FEATURES 8
arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x lo4 for chromium in Holden Village soil<br />
(transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this pathway.<br />
Surface Water and Fish<br />
Hazard quotients for molybdenum in Copper Creek were 6.44 x 10.' for ingestion of water and 3.1 8 r 1 0.'<br />
for ingestion of fish, both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer<br />
risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen.<br />
See~s and Mine Portal Drainage<br />
Seep and portal drainage data were evaluated separately. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both<br />
media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these<br />
media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 10.* for manganese in the<br />
1500-level main portal drainage to 5.3 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage.<br />
Lead was present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the<br />
MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks<br />
could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure<br />
frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the<br />
cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and portal drainage are not expected to<br />
cause effects in potentially exposed populations.<br />
Cumulative Risk<br />
MTCA requires the evaluation of cumulative risk when Method C levels are used. ,Evaluation of cumulative<br />
cancer risk was accomplished by summing all cancer risks for each receptor population. Cumulative risk for<br />
noncancer effects was evaluated by summing hazard quotients for each IHS associated with the same toxic<br />
effect endpoint<br />
Cumulative cancer risks for forest service workers (I. I6 x 10.~) are less than the acceptable level of I x 10"<br />
(Table 7.1-43). Cumulative cancer risks for village residents/recreational users are 1.10 x 10". Ingestion of<br />
soil from the "storage" location in the maintenance yard is the primary contributor to the cumulative risk<br />
within the rounding error of 1 x 10". When. adjusted to the appropriate number of significant digits, the<br />
cumulative risk is the same as the acceptable level of 1 x 10". In addition, this cum~ilative risk assumes that<br />
the children exposed recreationally during the summertime grow up to become residents of Holden Village<br />
who work in the maintenance yard. This assumption is obviously extremely conservative.<br />
All noncancer hazard quotients are less than the acceptable level of one, with one exception. Using a<br />
combination of extremely conservative exposure assumptions that are unlikely to occur resulted in the<br />
cumulative hazard quotient for nephrotoxic effects (non-cancer kidney . effects) for village<br />
residents/recreational users of 1.26. This is due primarily to cadmium in portal drainage. This cumulative<br />
conservative risk evaluation assumes that the receptor ,is daily drinking one-half liter of 1500-level main<br />
portal drainage water, one-half liter of seep water, and one-half liter of Copper Creek water, as well as<br />
ingesting soil from the lagoon area and maintenance area, ingesting soil, and eating fish caught from onsite<br />
areas on exposed days. This combination of exposures is extremely conservative and highly unlikely to<br />
occur. The water ingestion rates used in the calculation of Method B criteria assumed that one-half of a<br />
G:\~mUXIJ~\holdcn-2\n17-O.doc 7-33 DAMES<br />
& MOORE<br />
17693405419Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT