Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

13.01.2013 Views

Surface Soil Cancer risks and noncancer hazard quotients ingestion of all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotient. The cancer risks ranged from 8.91 s 10''~ for ber?.lliurn at the USFS guard station to 5.66 x lod for arsenic in the maintenance area. The hazard quotients ranged from 4.1 5 x lod for beryllium at the USFS guard station soil to 2.04 x 10" for copper in the lagoon area soil. Lead was detected in maintenance yard and lagoon area soil at concentrations exceeding the screening criteria (1070 mgkg in the maintenance yard and 620 mgkg in the lagoon area). However. because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. USEPA guidelines recommend a cleanup level of 400 mg/kg for lead in soil at residential sites based on prediction of blood lead levels in children. Neither of these sites is residential and exposure time is expected to be significantly less than an assumed residential exposure duration of 7 day per week exposures for 30 years. The highest exposure concentrations are less than three times higher than the USEPA recommended levels. Therefore, concentrations of lead in soil in these two areas are not expected to cause effects in exposed populations. In addition, remedial actions in these two areas will likely significantly reduce the concentrations present. Total petroleum hydrocarbons were present in soil at the maintenance yard and lagoon area at levels exceeding h4TCA Method A level. Exposure concentrations ranged from 140 mglkg gasoline range hydrocarbons in the maintenance yard to 12,000 mg/kg diesel range hydrocarbons in the maintenance yard. Because no toxicity criteria exist for these complex mixtures, site-specific risks were not evaluated. However, as with lead, exposure times and durations at the maintenance yard and lagoon area are expected to be significantly lower than would be assumed for development of the Method A level, and therefore TPH is soil at these locations are not expected to be of concern for the limited time period that maintenance workers and recreational users are exposed populations. In addition, remedial actions in these areas should significantly reduce soil TPH concentrations. Sediment Cancer risks and noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk and hazard quotients. Cancer risks ranged from 1.08 x 10'~ for beryllium in all three areas to 4.72 x 10" for arsenic in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. The hazard quotients ranged from 6.25 x l O" for beryllium in all three areas to 1.68 x 10" for molybdenum in Railroad Creek sediments adjacent to the site. - Air' The site-specific hazard quotients calculated for manganese in air was 4.0 x lo-', which is below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since manganese was not a carcinogen. Particulate Emissions fiom Soil In order to evaluate current conditions and the potential for soiVtailings in each exposure area to be transported to air via fugitive dust emissions, a simple USEPA model was utilized to develop a particulate emission factor (PEF) for each exposure area. Cancer risks based on transfers from soil to air for all IHSs in all exposure areas were below the allowable MTCA cancer risk. Cancer risks ranged from 3.96 x lo4 for G\~mW5~\hoIdm-2\ni7-O.da 1769MOS019Uuly 27.199QJ: 16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x lo4 for chromium in Holden Village soil (transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this pathway. Surface Water and Fish Hazard quotients for molybdenum in Copper Creek were 6.44 x 10.' for ingestion of water and 3.1 8 r 1 0.' for ingestion of fish, both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen. See~s and Mine Portal Drainage Seep and portal drainage data were evaluated separately. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 10.* for manganese in the 1500-level main portal drainage to 5.3 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage. Lead was present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and portal drainage are not expected to cause effects in potentially exposed populations. Cumulative Risk MTCA requires the evaluation of cumulative risk when Method C levels are used. ,Evaluation of cumulative cancer risk was accomplished by summing all cancer risks for each receptor population. Cumulative risk for noncancer effects was evaluated by summing hazard quotients for each IHS associated with the same toxic effect endpoint Cumulative cancer risks for forest service workers (I. I6 x 10.~) are less than the acceptable level of I x 10" (Table 7.1-43). Cumulative cancer risks for village residents/recreational users are 1.10 x 10". Ingestion of soil from the "storage" location in the maintenance yard is the primary contributor to the cumulative risk within the rounding error of 1 x 10". When. adjusted to the appropriate number of significant digits, the cumulative risk is the same as the acceptable level of 1 x 10". In addition, this cum~ilative risk assumes that the children exposed recreationally during the summertime grow up to become residents of Holden Village who work in the maintenance yard. This assumption is obviously extremely conservative. All noncancer hazard quotients are less than the acceptable level of one, with one exception. Using a combination of extremely conservative exposure assumptions that are unlikely to occur resulted in the cumulative hazard quotient for nephrotoxic effects (non-cancer kidney . effects) for village residents/recreational users of 1.26. This is due primarily to cadmium in portal drainage. This cumulative conservative risk evaluation assumes that the receptor ,is daily drinking one-half liter of 1500-level main portal drainage water, one-half liter of seep water, and one-half liter of Copper Creek water, as well as ingesting soil from the lagoon area and maintenance area, ingesting soil, and eating fish caught from onsite areas on exposed days. This combination of exposures is extremely conservative and highly unlikely to occur. The water ingestion rates used in the calculation of Method B criteria assumed that one-half of a G:\~mUXIJ~\holdcn-2\n17-O.doc 7-33 DAMES & MOORE 17693405419Uuly 27.1999.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

arsenic in the USFS guard station soil (transferred to air) to 5.69 x lo4 for chromium in Holden Village soil<br />

(transferred to air). There were no hazard quotients calculated for this pathway.<br />

Surface Water and Fish<br />

Hazard quotients for molybdenum in Copper Creek were 6.44 x 10.' for ingestion of water and 3.1 8 r 1 0.'<br />

for ingestion of fish, both of which are below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer<br />

risks calculated for this media since the IHS was not a carcinogen.<br />

See~s and Mine Portal Drainage<br />

Seep and portal drainage data were evaluated separately. Noncancer hazard quotients for all IHSs in both<br />

media were below the allowable MTCA hazard quotient. There were no cancer risks calculated for these<br />

media since IHSs were not carcinogens. The hazard quotients ranged from 1.15 x 10.* for manganese in the<br />

1500-level main portal drainage to 5.3 1 x 10" for cadmium in the 1500-level main portal drainage.<br />

Lead was present in both seeps and the 1500-level main portal drainage at concentrations exceeding the<br />

MTCA Method A level; however, because no toxicity criteria exist for this constituent, site-specific risks<br />

could not be evaluated. While exposure concentrations exceed MTCA Method A level, the exposure<br />

frequencies and water ingestion rates expected at the site are significantly less than those upon which the<br />

cleanup criteria is based. Therefore, concentrations of lead in seeps and portal drainage are not expected to<br />

cause effects in potentially exposed populations.<br />

Cumulative Risk<br />

MTCA requires the evaluation of cumulative risk when Method C levels are used. ,Evaluation of cumulative<br />

cancer risk was accomplished by summing all cancer risks for each receptor population. Cumulative risk for<br />

noncancer effects was evaluated by summing hazard quotients for each IHS associated with the same toxic<br />

effect endpoint<br />

Cumulative cancer risks for forest service workers (I. I6 x 10.~) are less than the acceptable level of I x 10"<br />

(Table 7.1-43). Cumulative cancer risks for village residents/recreational users are 1.10 x 10". Ingestion of<br />

soil from the "storage" location in the maintenance yard is the primary contributor to the cumulative risk<br />

within the rounding error of 1 x 10". When. adjusted to the appropriate number of significant digits, the<br />

cumulative risk is the same as the acceptable level of 1 x 10". In addition, this cum~ilative risk assumes that<br />

the children exposed recreationally during the summertime grow up to become residents of Holden Village<br />

who work in the maintenance yard. This assumption is obviously extremely conservative.<br />

All noncancer hazard quotients are less than the acceptable level of one, with one exception. Using a<br />

combination of extremely conservative exposure assumptions that are unlikely to occur resulted in the<br />

cumulative hazard quotient for nephrotoxic effects (non-cancer kidney . effects) for village<br />

residents/recreational users of 1.26. This is due primarily to cadmium in portal drainage. This cumulative<br />

conservative risk evaluation assumes that the receptor ,is daily drinking one-half liter of 1500-level main<br />

portal drainage water, one-half liter of seep water, and one-half liter of Copper Creek water, as well as<br />

ingesting soil from the lagoon area and maintenance area, ingesting soil, and eating fish caught from onsite<br />

areas on exposed days. This combination of exposures is extremely conservative and highly unlikely to<br />

occur. The water ingestion rates used in the calculation of Method B criteria assumed that one-half of a<br />

G:\~mUXIJ~\holdcn-2\n17-O.doc 7-33 DAMES<br />

& MOORE<br />

17693405419Uuly 27.<strong>1999</strong>.5:16 PMDRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!