13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

parameters did not indicate seasonal differences. The data were compared to RI data where appropriate and<br />

were relatively consistent between historical data and the RI.<br />

5.3.6.2 Upstream Data<br />

Samples were collected during the RI at CC-1 in May, July, and September 1997 to assess seasonal<br />

variability of metal concentrations and in May 1998. The data were included in the background surface<br />

water quality assessment discussed in Section 5.3.1. Summarized sample data are provided in Table 5.3-34.<br />

Sample data and associated WQC are summarized for each sampling event in Tables 5.3-23 through 5.3-'27.<br />

Background values are summarized in Table 5.3- 1.<br />

The metal concentrations at CC-I do not appear to increase or decrease in response to seasonal variations.<br />

Field measurements did not indicate significant variability between sampling events.<br />

5.3.6.3 Adjacent to Tailings Piles<br />

Samples were collected in Copper Creek at station CC-2 prior to the confluence with Railroad Creek during<br />

May, July, and September 1997 and May 1998. Samples were analyzed for the same analytical suite as the<br />

CC-1 samples. Comparison of CC-2 data to WQC indicated that metal concentrations were below the<br />

AWQC and CWQC, with the exception of lead. The detection limit for lead (7 pg/L) during May 1997 was<br />

above the AWQC (6.6 p a) and CWQC (0.26 pg/L) in the dissolved fraction. The result was qualified as<br />

not detected during data validation due to laboratory contamination. The result for lead in the total fraction<br />

in May 1997 showed that lead was not detected in this hction above the chronic or acute criteria. The<br />

comparison of total to the dissolved concentrations indicate that lead results for May 1997 are not above the<br />

criteria. The lead result in September 1997 was slightly above the chronic criteria (0.3 vs. 0.21 pa).<br />

Dissolved lead in May 1998 was below AWQC and CWQC. Generally data from 1998 were similar to<br />

data collected in 1997. Concentrations of total aluminum, iron, and manganese were 5 times greater in<br />

1998 than 1997; however, the dissolved concentrations were similar. For those metals that do not<br />

currently have water quality criteria assigned, concentrations were below background values and MTCA<br />

B levels. Measurements for pH at CC-2 ranged from 6.1 to 8.1 SU, similar to measurements at CC-1 (6.0 to<br />

8.0 SU).<br />

The results of CC-2 are comparable to the CC-1 results. In addition, the metal concentrations between<br />

stations do not indicate seasonal variations. PCOCs were not identified for Copper Creek.<br />

5.3.7 Other Railroad Creek Tributaries<br />

Samples were collected from Holden Creek, Big Creek, and TenMile Creek and the data were<br />

incorporated into the background surface water quality assessment discussed in Section 5.3.1. The<br />

statistically derived background values are summarized in Table 5.3.1. Detailed data summaries for<br />

Holden Creek, Big Creek, and TenMile Creek are included in Tables 5.3-36through 5.3-38.<br />

\U~M~SEAI\VOLI\COMMOMW~WDATA\~~~\REPORTSWOLDEN-ZUUU~.~OC<br />

5-36<br />

17693-005-0 19Uuly 28,<strong>1999</strong>; 1 1 :09 AMPRAFT FINAL R1 REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!