13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

sampling rounds, the field filter blank results suggested that barium and zinc were artificially introduced<br />

during the filtration process. Other metals (aluminum, calcium, copper, manganese, silver, and sodium)<br />

were also detected at levels near the detection limits; however, these detections did not impact data usability.<br />

Concentrations detected in the filter blank for barium (1 8.7 pg/L) and zinc (6 to 16 pg/L) were considered<br />

during the data evaluation as these potential introductions did impact the assessment of the data when<br />

compared to water quality criteria.<br />

As previously described in Section 5.1.2, Site surface water data was initially compared to the federal and<br />

state acute (AWQC) and chronic (CWQC) aquatic life criteria established. Where WQC were not<br />

established, Site data were conipared to area surface water background concentrations and MTCA<br />

Method B cleanup levels for surface water. AWQC and CWQC is established for dissolved '<br />

concentrations of arsenic, cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc. Only an AWQC is<br />

available for dissolved silver concentrations. AWQC and CWQC for selenium are based on total<br />

concentrations. The AWQC for mercury is based on dissolved concentrations; however, the CWQC is<br />

based on the total recoverable concentration. Criteria for cadmium, chromium, copper, lead, nickel,<br />

silver, and zinc are corrected based on water hardness. The federal AWQC and CWQC specifies the use<br />

of a 25 ppm hardness value for metals requiring hardness correction when measured hardness is less than<br />

25 ppm. The State of Washington specifies the use of actual hardness measurements. The data tables<br />

provide both the use of 25 ppm hardness and measured hardness corrected criteria. For discussion<br />

purposes, the measured hardness corrected criteria is discussed.<br />

Criteria for the protection of aquatic life is provided for beryllium and iron by reference to the EPA<br />

document "Quality Criteria for Water, 1986" in the Washington State regulatory guidance WAC 173-<br />

20 1 A. These criteria are shown in Table 5.1 - 1 and are assumed to be based on dissolved analysis.<br />

The analytical methods used to measure surface water metal concentrations were selected to provide the<br />

lowest technically achievable detection limits in an attempt to be at or below the AWQCICWQC. As the RI<br />

data collection and data evaluation progressed, analytical methods were adjusted to facilitate recognized<br />

data needs such as reducing detection limits to clearly evaluate exceedances as compared to water quality<br />

criteria. The method changes were documented in the SAPS and QAPPs associated with each field phase.<br />

The detection limits for lead and mercury were above the aquatic life chronic criteria (CWQC) in 'April<br />

1997. Following this round, the lead and mercury methods were revised to provide lower detection limits.<br />

During subsequent sampling rounds in MaylJune and July 1997; mercury and selenium were not detected or<br />

were detected at concentrations that were orders of magnitude below WQC. These analyses were then<br />

eliminated from fbture sampling events. The lead concentrations detected in surface water samples<br />

collected during 1997 were suspect due to intermittent problems with laboratory method blank<br />

contamination. Additionally, the detection limit provided by the method selected was often at or above<br />

the CWQC., The method was reevaluated prior to 1998 sample collection and revised to a draft low-level<br />

EPA method. The revised method resulted in detection limits well below the CWQC for lead. The May<br />

1998 data allowed data evaluation to clearly determine if exceedances for lead were apparent in surface<br />

water in Railroad Creek during the spring.<br />

The surface water discussion is organized and presented beginning with a discussion on the assessment of<br />

area background surface water quality. Following the background discussion, individual sections discuss<br />

the chemical data collected from the Stehekin River watershed, Railroad Creek, portal drainage, Copper<br />

\U)M-SEAI\VOLI\COMMON\WP\WPDATAUW~PORTSWOLDW-~W-~.~OC<br />

5- 1 4<br />

17693-005-019Uuly 28. <strong>1999</strong>;11:09 AM;DRAFT FINAL RI REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!