13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accessed, including the RM-3 "Dan's Camp" station sampled by Pacific Northwest Laboratories (1992),<br />

during the initial reconnaissance of the creek. Beqause of the steep gradient and flows, both of which were<br />

considered a potentially unacceptable risk to the sampling team, no aquatic sampling locations were<br />

identified within these reaches. However, based on field observations, RC-10 could be considered<br />

representative of reach "C" and. thus, the reference locations at Bridge Creek and South Fork Agnes Creek<br />

could be considered suitable references for reach "C."<br />

Reach "A" is at the mouth of Railroad Creek and is unique due to channel slope, valley width, the<br />

percentage of glaciers, and the proximity of the lake. A reach of Company Creek, a tributary to the Stehekin<br />

River, was identified as a potential reference reach based on the evaluation of the ten hydro- and geological<br />

parameters previously described. This particular reach was approximately 4 miles upstream From the<br />

confluence with the Stehekin River and was the only reach within Company Creek considered to qualify for<br />

reference based on the evaluation of the ten parameters. However, during field verification, the Company<br />

Creek reach was determined inaccessible and of substantially lower discharge than any of the Railroad<br />

Creek reaches. Therefore, the Company Creek reach was eliminated as a reference reach candidate.<br />

Subsequent to the final selection of stream reaches determined to be qualified as reference reaches, the<br />

USFS identified the need to select a reference reach to represent Railroad Creek reach "A" with the primary<br />

criteria being the potential for migratory species to frequent the reach during the spawning season. The<br />

migratory species of particular concern in this case was the Kokanee salmon. Although the importance of<br />

the ten criteria and its application for selecting reference reaches were recognized, the primary<br />

criteria for selecting a reference reach for lower Railroad Creek (which is accessible to Lake Chelan<br />

spawning kokanee salmon) was the documented occurrence of kokanee salmon in the reference reach. The<br />

lower segment of Company Creek has historically served as a quality spawning tributary to the Stehekin<br />

River for Lake Chelan kokanee salmon. Therefore, a reach of lower Company Creek was selected as a<br />

possible reference for lower Railroad Creek with the qualification that Company Creek was not similar to<br />

lower Railroad Creek with respect to the ten hydrologic and geologic parameters and the stream discharge<br />

but with respect to the potential for kokanee salmon to access the stream.<br />

4.6.1.2 Habitat Evaluations<br />

Aquatic sampling locations were selected in an attempt to minimize variations attributable to habitat.<br />

However, since not all habitat variables could be held constant, habitat was evaluated to estimate the<br />

potential for supporting viable aquatic resources based on physical habitat quality in comparison to<br />

reference locations. As previously described, habitat was qualitatively evaluated using the guidance<br />

provided in the U.S. EPA (1993), Region 10 In-stream Biological Monitoring Handbook for Wadable<br />

Streams in the Pacific Northwest. Furthermore, the evaluation of habitat was not intended to indicate<br />

trout carrying capacity but was employed merely to contribute to the weight of evidence used to assess<br />

the conditions of the aquatic communities within Railroad Creek and the various reference streams.<br />

All ten locations (including the reference locations) were evaluated. The average (five transects per<br />

location) habitat parameter ratings by location are presented in Table 4.6-2. Again, it is emphasized that the<br />

habitat scores do not represent potential trout biomass or carrying capacity but are used only to compare<br />

stations with respect to overall habitat quality. Furthermore, although certain stations may appear to be<br />

G:\WPDATA\OOS\REPORTS\HOLDEN-ZW-O.DOC<br />

17693-005-OI9Wuly 19. <strong>1999</strong>:4:51 PM:DRAFT FMAL Rl REPORT<br />

4-96 DAMES & MOORE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!