13.01.2013 Views

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

December 1 1, 1998<br />

Sediment Data, Fall 1998, Holden Mine<br />

Page 2<br />

The following comments refer to ARl's performance in meeting quality control specifications<br />

described in the EPA documents "EPA Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846", January<br />

1995, 'Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes", March 1983, and "USEPA Contract<br />

Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data Review', February 1994.<br />

AVS, TOC, and grain size data were evaluated using guidance referenced in methods published in the<br />

following sources: "Determination of Acid Volatile Sulfides and Simultaneously Extractable Metals in<br />

Sediment", EPA, April 1991, PSEP guidelines, and Plumb 1981. Data were also reviewed in reference<br />

to the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) prepared for the Phase Ill Remedial Investigation<br />

referenced in addendum (August 28, 1998) to the Sampling and Analysis Plan.<br />

Metals<br />

The ,report is divided into subsections based on type of analyses performed.<br />

Samples were prepared in the laboratory using EPA Methods 3010, 3050, and 200.8 as<br />

appropriate. Samples were analyzed by ICP (EPA Method. 6010A) and ICP MS (EPA Method 200.8<br />

Modified) methods.<br />

1. Holding Time - Acceptable<br />

2. Tunes (ICP MS analysis only) - Acceptable<br />

3. Initial Calibration - Acceptable<br />

4. Continuing calibration - Acceptable<br />

5. Blanks<br />

Aluminum (21.3 uglL) was detected in the continuing calibration blank (CCB) analyzed prior to<br />

samples STE-SED-101698-4, LUC-SED-101698-2-2, LUC-SED-101698-1-2, LUC-SED-101598-3.5-2,<br />

LUC-SED-101598-3-1A, LUC-SED-101598-1-1, LUC-SED-101598-3-2, LUC-SED-101598-3.5-1,<br />

LUC-SED-101598-3-1 C, and LUC-SED-101598-3-1 B. As the concentration of aluminum in the samples<br />

was several orders of magnitude above the CCB concentration, the data were not affected. Data<br />

qualifiers were not assigned.<br />

Aluminum (7 mglkg) was detected in the method blank associated with the sediment samples in<br />

this sample group. The concentration of aluminum detected, in the samples was greater than 10X the<br />

concentration detected in the method blank. Data were not qualified.<br />

Aluminum (0.03 mg/L) was detected in the method blank associated with samples Rinse<br />

10/1 5/98 and Rinse 10116198. The following metals were detected in the rinsate blanks:<br />

Rinse I011 5/98 Rinse 10/1 6/98<br />

Aluminum 0.17 mg/L Aluminum 0.10 mg/L<br />

Manganese 0.0003 mglL Iron 0.03 mg/L<br />

Zinc 0.203 mg/L Manganese 0.0006 mg/L<br />

Zinc 0.007 mg/L<br />

The aluminum results were qualified as not detected in the rinsate samples due to CCB results.<br />

The concentration of manganese, iron, and zinc in the associated sediment samples were orders of<br />

magnitude higher than the rinsate blanks. The sample data were not affected. Data were not qualified.<br />

DAMES & MOORE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!