Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service Dames & Moore, 1999 - USDA Forest Service

13.01.2013 Views

MEMORANDUM Date: June 15,1998 To: Rik Langendoen, Project Manager From: Karen Mixon, Project Chemist \(r(\ Subject: Standard Data Quality Review Holden Mine Remedial Investigation Phase Ill Low Level Lead Data, May 1998 Dames & Moore Job #17693-005-019 The standard data quality review of 36 water samples colleded April 30 through May 5, 1998 has been completed. The samples were submitted to Frontier Geosclences laboratory in Seattle, Washington. The samples were analyzed for low level lead by draft EPA Method 1638 modified. The analyses were performed in accordance with the method specified. A validatable package containing method associated QAlQC data and summarized sample data was provided by the laboratory. The following samples were analyzed and reported by Frontier Geosciences. The samples were identified by the field identification. DissolvedKotal Metals DissolvedlTotal Metals Dissolvecirrotal Metals DissolvedKotal Metals Total Metals Dissolved/Total Metals DissolvedlTotal Metals Dissolved/Total Metals DissoIved~Total Metals Dissolvedmotal Metals Dissolvedflotal Metals DissolvedITotal Metals Dissolvecirrotal Metals Dissolved~Total Metals Dissolvedflotal Metals Dissolvedflotal Metals Dissolved/Total Metals

June 15,1998 Low Level Lead, May 1998, Holden Mine Page 2 VP- 1 SP-23 Analvses Reauested DissolvedlTotal Metals Dissolved Metals The following comments refer to Frontier Geosclences' perfomance in meeting quality control specifications described in the EPA documents 'Draft Method '1638'~ and 'USEPA Contract Laboratory Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data RevieM, February 1994, and the Quality Assurance Projed Plan (QAPP) prepared .for the Phase Ill Remedial Investigation dated April 17, 1997. Sample aliquots for dissolved metals were filtered in the field. Samples were collected in predeaned containers provided by Frontier. The samples were presewed immediately upon receipt by the laboratory. Samples were prepared in the laboratory using EPA Method 1638 modified as documented .by Frontier Geosciences. 1. Holding Time - Acceptable 2. Tunes - Acceptable 3. Initial Calibration - Acceptable 4. Continuing Calibration - Acceptable 5. Blanks - Acceptable Blank subtradion is outlined in the method.' The reagent blank was properly analyzed and results were averaged per the method for the purpose of blank subtraction related to sample calculation. 6. Internal Standards - Acceptable 7. Laboratory Control Sample - ~cceptable 8. Laboratory Duplicate Sample - Acceptable 9. Field Duplicate - Acceptable A field duplicate for RC-4 was submitted and labeled RC-4X. 10. Matrix SpikeIMatrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD) - Acceptable A MSIMSD was performed on the total fraction'of sample RC-4 and RC-10. 11. Detection Limits - Acceptable 12. Type of Review - Standard

June 15,1998<br />

Low Level Lead, May 1998, Holden Mine<br />

Page 2<br />

VP- 1<br />

SP-23<br />

Analvses Reauested<br />

DissolvedlTotal Metals<br />

Dissolved Metals<br />

The following comments refer to Frontier Geosclences' perfomance in meeting quality control<br />

specifications described in the EPA documents 'Draft Method '1638'~ and 'USEPA Contract Laboratory<br />

Program (CLP) National Functional Guidelines for Inorganic Data RevieM, February 1994, and the<br />

Quality Assurance Projed Plan (QAPP) prepared .for the Phase Ill Remedial Investigation dated April<br />

17, 1997.<br />

Sample aliquots for dissolved metals were filtered in the field. Samples were collected in<br />

predeaned containers provided by Frontier. The samples were presewed immediately upon receipt by<br />

the laboratory.<br />

Samples were prepared in the laboratory using EPA Method 1638 modified as documented .by<br />

Frontier Geosciences.<br />

1. Holding Time - Acceptable<br />

2. Tunes - Acceptable<br />

3. Initial Calibration - Acceptable<br />

4. Continuing Calibration - Acceptable<br />

5. Blanks - Acceptable<br />

Blank subtradion is outlined in the method.' The reagent blank was properly analyzed and<br />

results were averaged per the method for the purpose of blank subtraction related to sample calculation.<br />

6. Internal Standards - Acceptable<br />

7. Laboratory Control Sample - ~cceptable<br />

8. Laboratory Duplicate Sample - Acceptable<br />

9. Field Duplicate - Acceptable<br />

A field duplicate for RC-4 was submitted and labeled RC-4X.<br />

10. Matrix SpikeIMatrix Spike Duplicate (MSIMSD) - Acceptable<br />

A MSIMSD was performed on the total fraction'of sample RC-4 and RC-10.<br />

11. Detection Limits - Acceptable<br />

12. Type of Review - Standard

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!