12.01.2013 Views

impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...

impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...

impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 18: Allocation of Quantified Benefits to Rural <strong>Research</strong> Priorities<br />

Rural <strong>Research</strong> Priority<br />

Allocation<br />

(%)<br />

1. Productivity and Adding Value 95<br />

3. Natural Resource Management 5<br />

Total 100<br />

7.7 Sensitivity Analyses<br />

Sensitivity analyses were carried out to show the importance of assumptions about<br />

which there is the most uncertainty. Results are <strong>report</strong>ed in Tables 17. All sensitivity<br />

analyses were performed using a 5% discount rate with benefits taken over the life<br />

of the investment plus 30 years from the year of last investment. All other<br />

parameters were held at their base values.<br />

The target area for the yield increasing inoculants in particular was the most<br />

speculative assumption. The target area assumed of one million ha is only of the<br />

order of five percent of the Australian area of crops. Experience might show that a<br />

much larger area was suitable. A larger target area would also be associated with a<br />

larger benefit/ha and a more rapid rate of adoption. Therefore the HIGH benefit<br />

scenario assumed a trebling of the benefits assumed for the BASE case. The<br />

assumption of trebling benefits is equivalent to a doubling of the area and an<br />

increase in benefits/ha of 50 percent. For the LOW case, benefits were assumed to<br />

be halved and lagged five years from the BASE case level. Lower benefits/ha would<br />

result in slower adoption.<br />

Table 19 shows the investment criteria when the assumption regarding the levels<br />

and timing of benefits are varied.<br />

Criterion<br />

Present value of<br />

benefits (m$)<br />

Present value of<br />

costs (m$)<br />

Net present<br />

value (m$)<br />

Benefit cost<br />

ratio<br />

Internal Rate of<br />

Return (%)<br />

Table19: Sensitivity to Changes in Levels of Benefits<br />

(GRDC investment, 5% discount rate, 30 years)<br />

Level of Benefits<br />

LOW BASE HIGH<br />

13.69 42.44 131.51<br />

10.48 10.48 10.48<br />

3.21 31.96 121.03<br />

1.31 4.05 12.55<br />

6.1 12.4 20.3<br />

These sensitivity results show for plausible assumptions of benefits that because<br />

there is a considerable degree of uncertainty about some of the key assumptions, a<br />

wide range of rates of return are possible. If the benefits are trebled then the benefit<br />

_________________________________________________________________<br />

Agtrans <strong>Research</strong> Page 32

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!