impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...
impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...
impact assessment report series - Grains Research & Development ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 18: Allocation of Quantified Benefits to Rural <strong>Research</strong> Priorities<br />
Rural <strong>Research</strong> Priority<br />
Allocation<br />
(%)<br />
1. Productivity and Adding Value 95<br />
3. Natural Resource Management 5<br />
Total 100<br />
7.7 Sensitivity Analyses<br />
Sensitivity analyses were carried out to show the importance of assumptions about<br />
which there is the most uncertainty. Results are <strong>report</strong>ed in Tables 17. All sensitivity<br />
analyses were performed using a 5% discount rate with benefits taken over the life<br />
of the investment plus 30 years from the year of last investment. All other<br />
parameters were held at their base values.<br />
The target area for the yield increasing inoculants in particular was the most<br />
speculative assumption. The target area assumed of one million ha is only of the<br />
order of five percent of the Australian area of crops. Experience might show that a<br />
much larger area was suitable. A larger target area would also be associated with a<br />
larger benefit/ha and a more rapid rate of adoption. Therefore the HIGH benefit<br />
scenario assumed a trebling of the benefits assumed for the BASE case. The<br />
assumption of trebling benefits is equivalent to a doubling of the area and an<br />
increase in benefits/ha of 50 percent. For the LOW case, benefits were assumed to<br />
be halved and lagged five years from the BASE case level. Lower benefits/ha would<br />
result in slower adoption.<br />
Table 19 shows the investment criteria when the assumption regarding the levels<br />
and timing of benefits are varied.<br />
Criterion<br />
Present value of<br />
benefits (m$)<br />
Present value of<br />
costs (m$)<br />
Net present<br />
value (m$)<br />
Benefit cost<br />
ratio<br />
Internal Rate of<br />
Return (%)<br />
Table19: Sensitivity to Changes in Levels of Benefits<br />
(GRDC investment, 5% discount rate, 30 years)<br />
Level of Benefits<br />
LOW BASE HIGH<br />
13.69 42.44 131.51<br />
10.48 10.48 10.48<br />
3.21 31.96 121.03<br />
1.31 4.05 12.55<br />
6.1 12.4 20.3<br />
These sensitivity results show for plausible assumptions of benefits that because<br />
there is a considerable degree of uncertainty about some of the key assumptions, a<br />
wide range of rates of return are possible. If the benefits are trebled then the benefit<br />
_________________________________________________________________<br />
Agtrans <strong>Research</strong> Page 32