12.01.2013 Views

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

HEiDi 7<br />

The scattering factor F is a complex function describing the overlap of the scattering waves of<br />

each atom i (n per unit cell). si(Q) describes the scattering strength of the i-th atom on its<br />

position xi in dependence of the scattering vector Q, which depends on the character of cross<br />

section as described below.<br />

In this context one remark concerning statistics: For measurements of radiation the statistical<br />

error � is the square root of the number of measured events, e.g. x-ray or neutron particles.<br />

Thus, 100 events yield an error of 10% while 10,000 events yield an error of only 1%!<br />

Mean Square Displacements (MSD): Thermal movement of atoms around their average<br />

positions reduce the Bragg intensities during a diffraction experiment. The cause for this<br />

effect is the reduced probability density and therefore reduced cross section probability at the<br />

average positions. For higher temperatures (above a few Kelvin) the MSD Bi of the atoms<br />

increase linearly to the temperature T, this means B ~ T. Near a temperature of 0 K the MSD<br />

become constant with values larger than zero (zero point oscillation of the quantum<br />

mechanical harmonic oscillator).<br />

Thus, the true scattering capability si of the i-th atom in a structure has to be corrected by an<br />

angle-dependent factor (the so called Debye-Waller factor):<br />

si(Q) � si(Q) * exp(-Bi(sin �Q/�) 2 )<br />

This Debye-Waller factor decreases with increasing temperatures and yields an attenuation of<br />

the Bragg reflection intensities. At the same time this factor becomes significantly smaller<br />

with larger sin���~|Q|. Therefore, especially reflections with large indices loose a lot of<br />

intensity. The formula for anisotropic oscillations around their average positions looks like<br />

this:<br />

si(Q) � si(Q) * exp(-2� 2 (U i 11 h 2 a* 2 + U i 22 k 2 b* 2 + U i 33 l 2 c* 2 +<br />

+ 2U i 13 hl a*c* + 2U i 12 hk a*b* + 2U i 23kl b*c*))<br />

The transformation between B and Ueq (from the Uij calculated isotropic MSD for a sphere<br />

with identical volume) yields B = 8� 2 Ueq.<br />

For some structures the experimentally determined MSD are significantly larger than from the<br />

harmonic calculations of the thermal movement of the atoms expected. Such deviations can<br />

have different reasons: Static local deformations like point defects, mixed compounds,<br />

anharmonic oscillations or double well potentials where two energetically equal atomic<br />

positions are very near to each other and therefore distribute the same atom over the crystal<br />

with a 50%/50% chance to one or the other position. In all those cases an additional<br />

contribution to the pure Debye-Waller factor can be found which yields an increased MSD.<br />

Therefore in the following text only the term MSD will be used to avoid misunderstandings.<br />

3.2 Comparison of X-ray and <strong>Neutron</strong> Radiation<br />

X-Ray Radiation interacts as electromagnetic radiation only with the electron density in a<br />

crystal. This means the shell electrons of the atoms as well as the chemical binding. The<br />

scattering capability s (atomic form factor f(sin���)) of an atom depends on the number Z of<br />

its shell electrons (f(sin(�=0)/�) =Z). To be exact, f(sin(�)/�) is the Fourier transform of the<br />

radial electron density distribution ne(r): f(sin(�)/�)=s � � 0 4� 2 ne(r) sin(μr)/μr dr with<br />

μ=4�sin(�)/���Heavy atoms with many electrons contribute much stronger to reflection

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!