12.01.2013 Views

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

Neutron Scattering - JUWEL - Forschungszentrum Jülich

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

KWS-3 5<br />

2. The standard Q-range of KWS-3 is from 10 -4 to 3·10 -3 Å -1 . What the size of particles<br />

could be investigated in this Q-range? What are the form factor P(Q) and structure<br />

factor S(Q)? In which case the scattering intensity d�/d�(Q) could be represented as a<br />

product of the structure factor and form factor d�/d�(Q)= d�/d�(0)�P(Q)�S(Q)? What<br />

is the physical “content” of the forward scattering d�/d�(0) [I(0)]?<br />

3. The standard wavelength at KWS-3 is 12.5Å. What are disadvantages of this<br />

wavelength? What should we correctly select before sample preparation?<br />

4. What is the difference between pine-hole SANS and focused SANS? Why the beam<br />

size at KWS-3 is 20cm 2 ?<br />

4 Experiment Procedure<br />

Within the frame of this practicum we will explore aquaeous solution of monodisperse<br />

polystyrene (PS) microspheres with diameter 8000Å and the initial concentration 1% of<br />

particles in H2O. In future, this sample will be used at KWS-3 as “a standard sample” to check<br />

the performance of instrument, absolute calibration, instrument resolution.<br />

In Table 1 there is collected information about PS microspheres obtained from the<br />

producer; additionally all necessary information about H2O and D2O is listed there.<br />

Table 1. Parameters of used components<br />

Polystyrene Spheres H2O D2O<br />

<strong>Scattering</strong> Length Density [Å -2 ] 1.41·10 -6 -0.56·10 -6 6.50·10 -6<br />

Density, 20°C [g/cm 3 ] 1.05 1.0 1.05<br />

Radius [Å] 4000±45<br />

The contrast variation is proposed to proceed simply by step-by-step adding of D2O to the<br />

initial H2O solution of spheres. To estimate how much of D2O we should add, the simulation<br />

of the forward scattering should be done as function of D2O concentration:<br />

d�<br />

d� 0 ����SpheresV 2<br />

Spheres��Spheres � �Water�, where VSpheres is volume of PS spheres, �Spheres SLD of PS spheres, �Water SLD of D2O/H2O<br />

mixture, �Spheres volume fraction of PS spheres in D2O/H2O mixture. We could rewrite the<br />

above-mentioned equation in terms of �0 and �D2O, the volume fraction of PS spheres in the<br />

initial H2O solution and volume fraction of D2O in D2O/H2O mixture respectively:<br />

d�<br />

d� 0<br />

��� �0 (1 ��D2O )<br />

VSpheres �Spheres � � H 2O ��D2O (�D2O � � H 2O )<br />

1 �� 0� D2O<br />

� � 2<br />

In Figure 3 the forward scattering d� d� 0<br />

�� as a function of �D2O and � is plotted. At the<br />

starting point of the experiment (�D2O=0) we have PS spheres in pure H2O and maximal<br />

volume fraction of spheres �Spheres = �0 = 1%. Minimum of the plotted curve corresponds to<br />

the matching point of PS spheres in water. In Table 2 seven points around matching<br />

concentration are labeled with “CV” mark. In case of CV, from the scattering curves of<br />

above-mentioned samples we need to extract only “integral” parameter forward scattering to<br />

.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!