12.01.2013 Views

Chapter 4 Networks in Their Surrounding Contexts - Cornell University

Chapter 4 Networks in Their Surrounding Contexts - Cornell University

Chapter 4 Networks in Their Surrounding Contexts - Cornell University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4.4. TRACKING LINK FORMATION IN ON-LINE DATA 103<br />

probability<br />

0.025<br />

0.02<br />

0.015<br />

0.01<br />

0.005<br />

Probability of jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a community when k friends are already members<br />

0<br />

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50<br />

Figure 4.11: Quantify<strong>in</strong>g the effects of membership closure <strong>in</strong> a large onl<strong>in</strong>e dataset: The<br />

plot shows the probability of jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a LiveJournal community as a function of the number<br />

of friends who are already members [32].<br />

curve for focal closure behaves quite differently from the curve for triadic closure: it turns<br />

downward and appears to approximately level off, rather than turn<strong>in</strong>g slightly upward. Thus,<br />

subsequent shared classes after the first produce a “dim<strong>in</strong>ish<strong>in</strong>g returns” effect. Compar<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the same k<strong>in</strong>d of basel<strong>in</strong>e, <strong>in</strong> which the probability of l<strong>in</strong>k formation with k shared classes<br />

is 1 − (1 − p) k (shown as the dotted curve <strong>in</strong> Figure 4.10), we see that the real data turns<br />

downward more significantly than this <strong>in</strong>dependent model. Aga<strong>in</strong>, it is an <strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g open<br />

question to understand how this effect generalizes to other types of shared foci, and to other<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s.<br />

For membership closure, the analogous quantities have been measured <strong>in</strong> other on-l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

doma<strong>in</strong>s that possess both person-to-person <strong>in</strong>teractions and person-to-focus affiliations.<br />

Figure 4.11 is based on the blogg<strong>in</strong>g site LiveJournal, where friendships are designated by<br />

users <strong>in</strong> their profiles, and where foci correspond to membership <strong>in</strong> user-def<strong>in</strong>ed communities<br />

[32]; thus the plot shows the probability of jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a community as a function of the number<br />

of friends who have already done so. Figure 4.12 shows a similar analysis for Wikipedia [122].<br />

Here, the social-affiliation network conta<strong>in</strong>s a node for each Wikipedia editor who ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s<br />

a user account and user talk page on the system; and there is an edge jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g two such editors<br />

if they have communicated, with one editor writ<strong>in</strong>g on the user talk page of the other. Each<br />

k

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!