NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines
NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines
PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – Joint Responsibilities � NCTN Regulatory Support Services (RSS) via the Cancer Trials Support Unit (CTSU) � NCTN Specification for appropriate designation of per case funding for trials prior to activation � NCI CIRB Review for studies as required under these Guidelines 6. Legacy Studies Legacy studies supported by the NCTN Program will be conducted under the same NCTN Terms and Conditions of Award as are those studies that commence under the NCTN Program. Hence, the awardees of any of the key components of the NCTN Program (i.e., Network Group Operations Centers, Network Group Statistics and Data Management Centers, Network Integrated Translational Science Awards, Network Lead Academic Participating Sites, Network Radiotherapy and Imaging Core Services Centers, and Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials Network) are bound by the Terms and Conditions of their Award under the NCTN Program when working on legacy studies that are supported by the NCTN Program. Page 90 of 241
PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – Appeals Process E. Appeals Process for Decisions Regarding Study Proposals & Types of Studies Performed by NCTN Program This appeal process is only for disagreements related to scientific merit decisions made on study proposals for the NCTN Program or the programmatic definition of study types supported under the NCTN Program. 1. Decisions on Study Proposals The appeals process for decisions related to study proposals supported under the NCTN Program (including both intervention and non-intervention studies) is described below. � For NCTN phase 3 and phase 2 Concepts evaluated by NCI Scientific Steering Committees (or the CTEP Protocol Review Committee for disease areas without an NCI Scientific Steering Committee or in lieu of an NCI Scientific Steering Committee because of scheduling/workload issues) that are not approved for development based on scientific merit, the Network Group Operations Center may “appeal” the decision to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the Network Group Operations Center believes that there were factual errors in the evaluation that led to the disapproval. If the Director agrees with the appeal request by the Network Group Operations Center, the Director will direct the appropriate NCI disease-specific Steering Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal. The result of the re-evaluation will be considered final. � For NCTN phase 1 and phase 2 Letter of Intent (LOI) proposals evaluated by NCT/CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee for trials proposals that would be conducted under CTEP IND, the Network Group Operations Center may appeal an LOI not approved for development based on scientific merit by requesting that the Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC) review the LOI. The result of the review of the LOI by the IDSC will be considered final. � For NCTN phase 1 and phase 2 LOIs reviewed by NCI/CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee for trials proposals that would NOT be conducted under CTEP IND, the Network Group Operations Center may appeal an LOI not approved for development based on scientific merit to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the Network Group Operations Center believes that there were factual errors in the review that led to the disapproval. If the Director agrees with the appeal by the Center, the Director will direct CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal. The result of the re-evaluation will be considered final. � For NCTN non-intervention studies (i.e., correlative science studies that request use of biospecimens collected in association with an NCTN trial) reviewed by NCI/CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee or evaluated by an NCI/DCTD-approved NCTN Correlative Science Committee, the Network Group Operations Center may appeal a study proposal not approved for development based on scientific merit to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the Network Group Operations Center believes that there were factual errors in the review that led to the disapproval. If the Director agrees with the appeal by the Center, the Director will direct CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee or the NCI/DCTD-approved NCTN Correlative Science Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal. The result of the re-evaluation will be considered final. Any approval of a Concept, LOI, or non-intervention study proposal, even after appeal, is subject to feasibility/resource considerations as determined by NCI/DCTD. 2. Decisions on Types of Studies Funded Under the NCTN Program The Associate Director, NCI/CTEP makes decisions regarding any questions regarding the interpretation of the types of studies funded under the NCTN Program in consultation with the Chief of the Clinical Investigations Branch and Lead NCTN Program Director. The Network Group Operations Center may appeal this decision to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis for a particular study, if the Network Group Operations Center believes the type of study is within the scope of the NCTN Program as described in these Guidelines. If the Director agrees with the appeal by the Network Group Operations Page 91 of 241
- Page 39 and 40: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 41 and 42: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 43 and 44: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 45 and 46: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 47 and 48: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 49 and 50: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 51 and 52: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 53 and 54: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 55 and 56: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 57 and 58: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 59 and 60: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 61 and 62: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 63 and 64: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 65 and 66: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 67 and 68: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 69 and 70: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 71 and 72: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 73 and 74: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 75 and 76: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 77 and 78: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 79 and 80: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 81 and 82: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 83 and 84: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 85 and 86: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 87 and 88: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 89: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 93 and 94: PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Se
- Page 95 and 96: PART 2: Submission of Competing New
- Page 97 and 98: PART 2: Submission of Competing New
- Page 99 and 100: PART 2: Submission of Competing New
- Page 101 and 102: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 103 and 104: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 105 and 106: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 107 and 108: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 109 and 110: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 111 and 112: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 113 and 114: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 115 and 116: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 117 and 118: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 119 and 120: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 121 and 122: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 123 and 124: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 125 and 126: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 127 and 128: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 129 and 130: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 131 and 132: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 133 and 134: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 135 and 136: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 137 and 138: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 139 and 140: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
PART 1: Overview of <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – Appeals Process<br />
E. Appeals Process for Decisions Regarding Study Proposals & Types of Studies Performed by <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />
This appeal process is only for disagreements related to scientific merit decisions made on study proposals for<br />
the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> or the programmatic definition of study types supported under the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong>.<br />
1. Decisions on Study Proposals<br />
The appeals process for decisions related to study proposals supported under the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> (including<br />
both intervention and non-intervention studies) is described below.<br />
� For <strong>NCTN</strong> phase 3 and phase 2 Concepts evaluated by <strong>NCI</strong> Scientific Steering Committees (or the CTEP<br />
Protocol Review Committee for disease areas without an <strong>NCI</strong> Scientific Steering Committee or in lieu of<br />
an <strong>NCI</strong> Scientific Steering Committee because of scheduling/workload issues) that are not approved for<br />
development based on scientific merit, the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center may “appeal” the<br />
decision to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations<br />
Center believes that there were factual errors in the evaluation that led to the disapproval. If the<br />
Director agrees with the appeal request by the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center, the Director will<br />
direct the appropriate <strong>NCI</strong> disease-specific Steering Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal. The<br />
result of the re-evaluation will be considered final.<br />
� For <strong>NCTN</strong> phase 1 and phase 2 Letter of Intent (LOI) proposals evaluated by NCT/CTEP’s Protocol<br />
Review Committee for trials proposals that would be conducted under CTEP IND, the <strong>Network</strong> Group<br />
Operations Center may appeal an LOI not approved for development based on scientific merit by<br />
requesting that the Investigational Drug Steering Committee (IDSC) review the LOI. The result of the<br />
review of the LOI by the IDSC will be considered final.<br />
� For <strong>NCTN</strong> phase 1 and phase 2 LOIs reviewed by <strong>NCI</strong>/CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee for trials<br />
proposals that would NOT be conducted under CTEP IND, the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center may<br />
appeal an LOI not approved for development based on scientific merit to the Director, Division of<br />
Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center believes that there were<br />
factual errors in the review that led to the disapproval. If the Director agrees with the appeal by the<br />
Center, the Director will direct CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal.<br />
The result of the re-evaluation will be considered final.<br />
� For <strong>NCTN</strong> non-intervention studies (i.e., correlative science studies that request use of biospecimens<br />
collected in association with an <strong>NCTN</strong> trial) reviewed by <strong>NCI</strong>/CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee or<br />
evaluated by an <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD-approved <strong>NCTN</strong> Correlative Science Committee, the <strong>Network</strong> Group<br />
Operations Center may appeal a study proposal not approved for development based on scientific<br />
merit to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, if the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations<br />
Center believes that there were factual errors in the review that led to the disapproval. If the Director<br />
agrees with the appeal by the Center, the Director will direct CTEP’s Protocol Review Committee or the<br />
<strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD-approved <strong>NCTN</strong> Correlative Science Committee to re-evaluate the study proposal. The result<br />
of the re-evaluation will be considered final.<br />
Any approval of a Concept, LOI, or non-intervention study proposal, even after appeal, is subject to<br />
feasibility/resource considerations as determined by <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD.<br />
2. Decisions on Types of Studies Funded Under the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong><br />
The Associate Director, <strong>NCI</strong>/CTEP makes decisions regarding any questions regarding the interpretation of<br />
the types of studies funded under the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> in consultation with the Chief of the <strong>Clinical</strong><br />
Investigations Branch and Lead <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> Director. The <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center may appeal<br />
this decision to the Director, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis for a particular study, if the<br />
<strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center believes the type of study is within the scope of the <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> as<br />
described in these <strong>Guidelines</strong>. If the Director agrees with the appeal by the <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations<br />
Page 91 of 241