NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines

NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines

ctep.cancer.gov
from ctep.cancer.gov More from this publisher
12.01.2013 Views

PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – NCI/DCTD Responsibilities The NCI/DCTD-approved Correlative Science Committee(s) will be constituted in a similar manner to that of the NCI Scientific Steering Committees with appropriate representation from the extramural oncology community (including experts in pathology, translational science, and statistics) as well as with Network Group and NCI/DCTD representatives and representatives in applicable disease areas. The committee representation will be approved by NCI/DCTD and will be constituted so that Network Group representation does not constitute a majority of the committee – similar to the NCI Scientific Steering Committees. These requests may also require approval or review/comment by a CTEP collaborator if the study is/was conducted under a CTEP binding collaborating agreement per requirements of the CTEP IP option (see information on the CTEP IP Option available at: http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/default.htm). All correlative science studies require CTEP review and approval by one of the procedures described above regardless of the number of patient specimens requested. It is anticipated that requests for a small number of specimens that do not constitute an important subset (e.g., specimens from only patients with a particular outcome when the outcome was a rare event) and do not require approval and/or comment by a CTEP collaborator will undergo an expedited review/approval process; however, review and approval is required (there are no “file-only” studies). NOTE: All requests for biospecimens collected in conjunction with or tied to an NCTN trial that are “banked” must undergo review and approval even if the collection or storage of specimens was funded from sources outside the NCTN Program as the NCTN clinical trial was supported by the NCI/DCTD under these Terms and Conditions of Award which requires review under a process approved by NCI/DCTD unless a specific exemption to the review policy is granted by NCI/DCTD. This requirement reflect NCI’s interest as a scientific matter and a substantial public policy interest in assuring biospecimen collections that are tied to publicly funded NCTN trials are made available to the general research community through an NCI-approved review process for meritorious use. Banked biospecimens in NCI-funded or other tumor banks tied to NCTN trials cannot be released without an approval letter from NCI/DCTD authorizing release for a specific research proposal that has been approved by the procedures described above. There are no exceptions to this policy. � Requests for use of clinical data only from an NCTN clinical trial is subject to the CTEP-approved data-sharing policy of the Network Group Operations Center that leads/led the trial. These requests may also require approval or review/comment by a CTEP collaborator if the study is/was conducted under a CTEP binding collaborating agreement per requirements of the CTEP IP option (see information on the CTEP IP Option at: http://ctep.cancer.gov/industryCollaborations2/default.htm). Evaluation/Review Outcome: In general, CTEP’s PRC (or the appropriate NCI SSC) discusses the submitted LOI (Concept) with all assigned reviewers and committee members and makes a decision on the study proposal from one of the 3 options provided below. A similar process is followed for review of non-intervention study proposals (i.e., correlative science studies requesting use of biospecimens collected in association with an NCTN trial) by CTEP’s PRC or a NCI/DCTD-approved NCTN Correlative Science Committee. Approved as written or with recommendations – The investigators are requested to give serious consideration to any recommendation included in the consensus review/evaluation but they are not obligated to amend the study proposal. If changes are made prior to activation of the study, the investigators must send CTEP a revision for review that details any changes in the previous CTEP-approved document. Approval-on-Hold is given initially for studies requiring Page 80 of 241

PART 1: Overview of NCTN Program Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – NCI/DCTD Responsibilities review/approval by a CTEP collaborator (e.g., collaborator providing investigational agent for the trial) and if/when the CTEP collaborator gives official approval, CTEP issues a final full approval for the study with or without recommendations. On occasion, an approval may come with a required modification specified in the approval letter and/or attached Consensus Evaluation/Consensus Review that will need to be incorporated into the study proposal at the time of protocol review. This is done for minor modifications so that the trial proposal does not need to go back as a pending when the modification is straightforward. Pending – The CTEP PRC or NCI SSC has significant questions about the proposed study. The proposed study can be approved if the investigators satisfactorily address the concerns included in the written consensus review/evaluation adequately (i.e., comments requiring a response). Disapproved – In the judgment of CTEP’s PRC or the NCI SSC, the study cannot be approved. In addition, all Concepts and non-intervention study proposals that are prioritized for further development by NCI SSCs or an NCI/DCTD-approved NCTN Correlative Science Committee must undergo expedited review by CTEP before final approval is given in order to ensure significant safety, feasibility, and regulatory issues are adequately addressed, including ensuring that there are adequate resources available for the study proposal or trial given the resource allocation constraints for the disease area, and to prevent duplication. However, it is expected that this final review/approval by CTEP can be accomplished in an expedited manner in most cases as designated NCI/DCTD staff participate as full members on the various NCI SSCs or NCI/DCTD-approved NCTN Correlative Science Committees and significant issues in these areas are incorporated into the evaluation/prioritization discussion. Also, any approved NCTN Concept for a phase 3 or phase 2/3 trial is submitted to FDA for comment and any approved NCTN LOI/Concept with an investigational device/biomarker for the particular clinical setting may also be submitted to FDA for comment even if the study is not identified as being specifically designed for a licensing indication for an agent or device. 3.2 Protocol Development Review/Approval and Amendment Review/Approval The protocol document must be reviewed and approved by NCI/DCTD prior to distribution by a Network Group to its sites for local IRB review (or NCI Central IRB review) and trial activation (i.e., opening the study to patient enrollment after approval of the study by at least one IRB). All approved adult phase 3 study protocols also require approval by the NCI Adult Central Institutional Review Board (CIRB) after approval of the protocol document by CTEP; however, distribution of the trial may proceed to sites using other IRBs prior to final CIRB approval. Any changes/modifications requested by the NCI CIRB at the time of its initial review may require an amendment to the study after distribution if CTEP believes any of the requested changes/modifications should be in master protocol document (either in the informed consent or in other sections of the protocol document). Minor changes in the informed consent document may be limited to the approved CIRB version of the informed consent document (IRB) for its sites only. After the trial is activated, all protocol amendments submitted on the trial require NCI CIRB approval prior to final approval of the amendment by CTEP. In select cases, phase 2 trials may also be required by NCI/DCTD to be reviewed by the NCI CIRB, especially those phase 2 studies that may be opened widely across the entire NCTN. All pediatric study protocols (except phase 1 study protocols - although these may be included in the future) require approval by the NCI Pediatric CIRB prior to final approval of the study protocol document by NCI/DCTD. Any change to the protocol document subsequent to its approval by CTEP must be submitted to CTEP’s Protocol and Information Office (PIO) in writing for review and approval by CTEP prior to implementation of the change, with the exception of administrative updates. Additional information on the procedures for protocol amendment can be found in the Investigator’s Handbook. Page 81 of 241

PART 1: Overview of <strong>NCTN</strong> <strong>Program</strong> Section IV – Terms/Conditions of Award – <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD Responsibilities<br />

review/approval by a CTEP collaborator (e.g., collaborator providing investigational agent for the<br />

trial) and if/when the CTEP collaborator gives official approval, CTEP issues a final full approval for<br />

the study with or without recommendations. On occasion, an approval may come with a required<br />

modification specified in the approval letter and/or attached Consensus Evaluation/Consensus<br />

Review that will need to be incorporated into the study proposal at the time of protocol review.<br />

This is done for minor modifications so that the trial proposal does not need to go back as a<br />

pending when the modification is straightforward.<br />

Pending – The CTEP PRC or <strong>NCI</strong> SSC has significant questions about the proposed study. The<br />

proposed study can be approved if the investigators satisfactorily address the concerns included in<br />

the written consensus review/evaluation adequately (i.e., comments requiring a response).<br />

Disapproved – In the judgment of CTEP’s PRC or the <strong>NCI</strong> SSC, the study cannot be approved.<br />

In addition, all Concepts and non-intervention study proposals that are prioritized for further<br />

development by <strong>NCI</strong> SSCs or an <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD-approved <strong>NCTN</strong> Correlative Science Committee must<br />

undergo expedited review by CTEP before final approval is given in order to ensure significant safety,<br />

feasibility, and regulatory issues are adequately addressed, including ensuring that there are adequate<br />

resources available for the study proposal or trial given the resource allocation constraints for the<br />

disease area, and to prevent duplication. However, it is expected that this final review/approval by<br />

CTEP can be accomplished in an expedited manner in most cases as designated <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD staff<br />

participate as full members on the various <strong>NCI</strong> SSCs or <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD-approved <strong>NCTN</strong> Correlative Science<br />

Committees and significant issues in these areas are incorporated into the evaluation/prioritization<br />

discussion.<br />

Also, any approved <strong>NCTN</strong> Concept for a phase 3 or phase 2/3 trial is submitted to FDA for comment and<br />

any approved <strong>NCTN</strong> LOI/Concept with an investigational device/biomarker for the particular clinical<br />

setting may also be submitted to FDA for comment even if the study is not identified as being<br />

specifically designed for a licensing indication for an agent or device.<br />

3.2 Protocol Development Review/Approval and Amendment Review/Approval<br />

The protocol document must be reviewed and approved by <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD prior to distribution by a<br />

<strong>Network</strong> Group to its sites for local IRB review (or <strong>NCI</strong> Central IRB review) and trial activation (i.e.,<br />

opening the study to patient enrollment after approval of the study by at least one IRB). All approved<br />

adult phase 3 study protocols also require approval by the <strong>NCI</strong> Adult Central Institutional Review Board<br />

(CIRB) after approval of the protocol document by CTEP; however, distribution of the trial may proceed<br />

to sites using other IRBs prior to final CIRB approval. Any changes/modifications requested by the <strong>NCI</strong><br />

CIRB at the time of its initial review may require an amendment to the study after distribution if CTEP<br />

believes any of the requested changes/modifications should be in master protocol document (either in<br />

the informed consent or in other sections of the protocol document). Minor changes in the informed<br />

consent document may be limited to the approved CIRB version of the informed consent document<br />

(IRB) for its sites only. After the trial is activated, all protocol amendments submitted on the trial<br />

require <strong>NCI</strong> CIRB approval prior to final approval of the amendment by CTEP. In select cases, phase 2<br />

trials may also be required by <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD to be reviewed by the <strong>NCI</strong> CIRB, especially those phase 2<br />

studies that may be opened widely across the entire <strong>NCTN</strong>.<br />

All pediatric study protocols (except phase 1 study protocols - although these may be included in the<br />

future) require approval by the <strong>NCI</strong> Pediatric CIRB prior to final approval of the study protocol<br />

document by <strong>NCI</strong>/DCTD.<br />

Any change to the protocol document subsequent to its approval by CTEP must be submitted to CTEP’s<br />

Protocol and Information Office (PIO) in writing for review and approval by CTEP prior to<br />

implementation of the change, with the exception of administrative updates. Additional information<br />

on the procedures for protocol amendment can be found in the Investigator’s Handbook.<br />

Page 81 of 241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!