NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines
NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines NCI National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) Program Guidelines
PART 2: Submission of New/Competing Application Section III.B.2.1 – Review Criteria Network Group Operations Center Approach Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific aims of the proposed Network Group Operations Center? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented? If the project is in the early stages of development, will the strategy establish feasibility and will particularly risky aspects be managed? Are the plans for 1) protection of human subjects from research risks, and 2) inclusion of minorities and members of both sexes/genders, as well as the inclusion of children, justified in terms of the scientific goals and research strategy proposed? Environment Will the scientific environment in which the work will be done contribute to the probability of success? Are the institutional support, equipment and other physical resources available to the investigators adequate for the project proposed? Will the clinical research conducted by the Network Group Operations Center benefit from unique features of the scientific environment, subject populations, or collaborative arrangements? Additional Scored Review Criteria In addition to the above review criteria, the following criteria will be applied to applications in the determination of scientific merit and the impact/priority score. Reviewers will consider each of the additional review criteria below in the determination of scientific merit, and give a separate score for each. A. Clinical Trials Development Program B. Member Site Accrual Program C. Operational Management D. Program for Collaborations & Participation in Collective Management of NCTN 2.1.3 Scored Review Criteria – Criterion A. Clinical Trial Development Program (Note: The entire Criterion A will receive one individual score; the subcategories and aspects listed will be assessed but not scored separately). Significance Overall Research Strategy: How well does the applicant's research strategy reflect an integrated scientific approach within oncology disease areas as well as across disease areas? Does the research strategy address important unmet clinical needs? Is the research strategy sufficiently practical and feasible? Are the disease areas included in the applicant’s overall research strategy appropriate and beneficial to the NCTN? How well would the applicant team contribute to the development of clinical trials for patients with rare cancers and how well would the applicant address underserved patient populations through trials that it leads or participates in across the NCTN? Quality of Clinical Trials: Based on the clinical trials currently being conducted as well as those proposed, what is the likelihood that the applicant's team can contribute meaningfully to developing and implementing multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional trials in a broad range of cancer types and special populations with specific scientific strategy and goals? Do the trials contain important integral and integrated translational science research questions that are appropriate and well justified? To what degree do their results reflect qualitatively new knowledge that advances the field and may inspire future clinical trials? Will (or have) the results lead (led) to meaningful practice changes for cancer care or other meaningful results (e.g., Phase 2 trials leading to Phase 3 trials Page 156 of 241
PART 2: Submission of New/Competing Application Section III.B.2.1 – Review Criteria Network Group Operations Center conducted by government or private sector, provision of important toxicity or dosing information)? Does the applicant team have effective mechanisms for promoting timely presentation and publications of the results of clinical trials and associated studies? Investigator(s) Senior Group Leadership for Clinical Trials Development: How well can the PD(s)/PI(s) and the entire team of investigators assembled by the applicant provide scientific leadership for state-of-the-art early and late phase clinical trials in adults and/or children with cancer? Will these investigators be able to work as a cohesive research team to efficiently and expeditiously develop and conduct NCTN clinical trials? Does the applicant have appropriate and clearly defined succession and transition plans for the senior leadership of the proposed Network Group Operations Center? Does the applicant have reasonable and appropriate limitations on terms for senior leadership that encourage rotation of leadership responsibilities? Scientific Research Committee Leadership: Do the research experience and qualifications of the leadership of the applicant's Scientific Research Committees provide multi-disciplinary representation (e.g., medical oncology, radiation oncology, imaging, surgery, pathology, translational science, patient advocacy) across a broad range of oncology diseases appropriate to the stated research goals? Does the leadership of the scientific committees have a track record of successful multiinstitutional early phase and especially late phase clinical trials research as evidenced by publications? Do the Scientific Research Committees provide leadership opportunities for a broad range of investigators and are there reasonable and appropriate limits on terms for senior leadership of the Scientific Research Committees that encourage rotation of leadership responsibilities and provide continuity and stability in the Committees? Administrative Committee Leadership: Are the experience and qualifications of the leadership of the applicant's Administrative Committees appropriate for development and oversight of the administrative management categories needed for conducting both early phase and especially late phase, multi-institutional, clinical trials (e.g., support functions for trials including involvement of patient advocates, support programs for enrollment of members of underserved patient populations, financial management)? Innovation Innovation in Early and Late Phase Clinical Trials: Within the confines of the ethical constraints applicable to early and late phase clinical trials for oncology patients, does the applicant propose novel or improved ways and/or methods to enhance or better serve its overall research strategy and the goals of developing and implementing multidisciplinary, multi-institutional trails in a range of cancer types and special populations with specific scientific strategy and goals? Approach Approach to Clinical Trial Development: Are the overall strategy, methodology, and analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific clinical aims of the applicant? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success presented for specific clinical trials? Environment Leveraging Resources to Support Research: How successful are the members of the applicant team in obtaining other funding (from NCI, other governmental agencies, Page 157 of 241
- Page 105 and 106: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 107 and 108: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 109 and 110: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 111 and 112: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 113 and 114: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 115 and 116: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 117 and 118: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 119 and 120: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 121 and 122: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 123 and 124: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 125 and 126: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 127 and 128: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 129 and 130: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 131 and 132: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 133 and 134: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 135 and 136: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 137 and 138: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 139 and 140: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 141 and 142: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 143 and 144: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 145 and 146: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 147 and 148: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 149 and 150: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 151 and 152: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 153 and 154: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 155: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 159 and 160: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 161 and 162: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 163 and 164: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 165 and 166: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 167 and 168: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 169 and 170: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 171 and 172: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 173 and 174: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 175 and 176: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 177 and 178: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 179 and 180: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 181 and 182: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 183 and 184: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 185 and 186: PART 2: Submission of New/Competing
- Page 187 and 188: PART 3: Submission of Non-Competing
- Page 189 and 190: TYPE OF STUDY PART 3: Submission No
- Page 191 and 192: PART 3: Submission Non-Competing Ap
- Page 193 and 194: PART 3: Submission Non-Competing Ap
- Page 195 and 196: PART 4: Appendices Section II - Req
- Page 197 and 198: PART 4: Appendices Section II - Req
- Page 199 and 200: PART 4: Appendices Section II - Req
- Page 201 and 202: Participating Site Member Category
- Page 203 and 204: PART 4: Appendices Section II - Req
- Page 205 and 206: PART 4: Appendices Section II - Req
PART 2: Submission of New/Competing Application Section III.B.2.1 – Review Criteria<br />
<strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center<br />
conducted by government or private sector, provision of important toxicity or dosing<br />
information)? Does the applicant team have effective mechanisms for promoting timely<br />
presentation and publications of the results of clinical trials and associated studies?<br />
Investigator(s)<br />
Senior Group Leadership for <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Trials</strong> Development: How well can the PD(s)/PI(s)<br />
and the entire team of investigators assembled by the applicant provide scientific<br />
leadership for state-of-the-art early and late phase clinical trials in adults and/or<br />
children with cancer? Will these investigators be able to work as a cohesive research<br />
team to efficiently and expeditiously develop and conduct <strong>NCTN</strong> clinical trials? Does the<br />
applicant have appropriate and clearly defined succession and transition plans for the<br />
senior leadership of the proposed <strong>Network</strong> Group Operations Center? Does the<br />
applicant have reasonable and appropriate limitations on terms for senior leadership<br />
that encourage rotation of leadership responsibilities?<br />
Scientific Research Committee Leadership: Do the research experience and<br />
qualifications of the leadership of the applicant's Scientific Research Committees<br />
provide multi-disciplinary representation (e.g., medical oncology, radiation oncology,<br />
imaging, surgery, pathology, translational science, patient advocacy) across a broad<br />
range of oncology diseases appropriate to the stated research goals? Does the<br />
leadership of the scientific committees have a track record of successful multiinstitutional<br />
early phase and especially late phase clinical trials research as evidenced by<br />
publications? Do the Scientific Research Committees provide leadership opportunities<br />
for a broad range of investigators and are there reasonable and appropriate limits on<br />
terms for senior leadership of the Scientific Research Committees that encourage<br />
rotation of leadership responsibilities and provide continuity and stability in the<br />
Committees?<br />
Administrative Committee Leadership: Are the experience and qualifications of the<br />
leadership of the applicant's Administrative Committees appropriate for development<br />
and oversight of the administrative management categories needed for conducting both<br />
early phase and especially late phase, multi-institutional, clinical trials (e.g., support<br />
functions for trials including involvement of patient advocates, support programs for<br />
enrollment of members of underserved patient populations, financial management)?<br />
Innovation<br />
Innovation in Early and Late Phase <strong>Clinical</strong> <strong>Trials</strong>: Within the confines of the ethical<br />
constraints applicable to early and late phase clinical trials for oncology patients, does<br />
the applicant propose novel or improved ways and/or methods to enhance or better<br />
serve its overall research strategy and the goals of developing and implementing multidisciplinary,<br />
multi-institutional trails in a range of cancer types and special populations<br />
with specific scientific strategy and goals?<br />
Approach<br />
Approach to <strong>Clinical</strong> Trial Development: Are the overall strategy, methodology, and<br />
analyses well-reasoned and appropriate to accomplish the specific clinical aims of the<br />
applicant? Are potential problems, alternative strategies, and benchmarks for success<br />
presented for specific clinical trials?<br />
Environment<br />
Leveraging Resources to Support Research: How successful are the members of the<br />
applicant team in obtaining other funding (from <strong>NCI</strong>, other governmental agencies,<br />
Page 157 of 241