11.01.2013 Views

CPT V24P7-Art1 (Content).pmd - Taxmann

CPT V24P7-Art1 (Content).pmd - Taxmann

CPT V24P7-Art1 (Content).pmd - Taxmann

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Direct Tax Laws<br />

680<br />

(e) The aggregate amount included under<br />

Lease Adjustment Account on account<br />

of lease equalization credits should<br />

be disclosed separately.<br />

The method of income measurement<br />

suggested in this paragraph, is in<br />

consonance with the inherent nature of<br />

a finance lease.”<br />

Thus, the “guidance notes” effective till AS 19<br />

was issued, made it obligatory on the part of<br />

the companies to debit to the lease rentals,<br />

annual lease charge comprising of minimum<br />

statutory depreciation and lease equalization<br />

charge, where the annual lease charge is more<br />

than the minimum statutory depreciation.<br />

On 1-4-2001 Accounting Standard AS 19 about<br />

accounting of leases was for the first time<br />

published by the ICAI and was made effective<br />

in respect of leases commencing on or after<br />

that date. AS 19 provides accounting of “Leases”,<br />

appropriate accounting policies and disclosure<br />

in relation to finance leases and operating leases.<br />

Para 26 thereof provides that lessor should<br />

recognize asset given under finance lease in<br />

its balance sheet as receivable at an amount<br />

equal to the net investment in the lease. As<br />

per para 27 thereof the lease payment receivable<br />

is treated by the lessor as repayment of principal,<br />

i.e., net investment in the lease and finance<br />

income to reimburse and reward the lessor for<br />

its investment and services. As per para 28<br />

finance income is recognized on the basis of<br />

a constant periodic rate of return on the net<br />

investment of the lessor outstanding in respect<br />

of the lease.<br />

Hon'ble High Court noticed that there is no<br />

conflict between AS 19 and any provision of<br />

the IT Act. Further, the Government has not<br />

notified any Accounting Standards in respect<br />

of lease, even though it has notified other<br />

Accounting Standards as required under section<br />

145(2). Therefore, the Hon'ble High Court in<br />

the impugned judgment took the view that<br />

recognition of revenue out of lease rentals will<br />

be governed by AS 19 by apportionment of<br />

August 1 to 15, 2012 u TAXMANN’S CORPORATE PROFESSIONALS TODAY u Vol. 24 u 60<br />

lease rentals into capital recovery and finance<br />

charges. There is a rationale in such an<br />

apportionment. Depreciation claimed according<br />

to the IT Act or according to the Companies<br />

Act may not always be equal to actual reduction<br />

in value of the asset with passage of time and<br />

due to wear and tear. The market value (residuary<br />

value) of the leased asset at the end of the<br />

lease period may not be equal to the written<br />

down value (WDV). The difference between<br />

the residuary value (Say RV) of the leased<br />

asset and its written down value is adjusted<br />

yearly by an amount called the “lease equalization<br />

charges”. It can be positive, meaning thereby<br />

that RV is more than WDV. It will result into<br />

a profit chargeable to tax. From the same logic<br />

if RV is less than the WDV, then the lease<br />

equalization charge will be negative and will<br />

be a charge on the profit. Thus, “lease<br />

equalization charges” are yearly adjustment<br />

entries to act as supplement to, or recovery<br />

from, statutory depreciation claimed and debited<br />

to P/L account and signify full recovery of<br />

value of asset reduced during the lease period.<br />

This can be claimed in the profit and loss<br />

account.<br />

The concept of apportionment of receipt into<br />

capital and revenue can also be understood<br />

from EMIs received by a finance company on<br />

grant of a housing loan or a car loan. EMIs<br />

consist of return of principal and interest and<br />

entire loan along with interest is paid back at<br />

the end of the term of the loan. What is taxed<br />

in the hands of the lender is not the entire EMI<br />

received by the lender but only the interest<br />

part of it. The other part is the recovery of<br />

capital advanced as a loan.<br />

Theoretically the concept of real income is<br />

applicable when there is technical or legal<br />

right to receive an income but really no income<br />

is received due to factors beyond the control<br />

of the assessee. In State Bank of Travancore v.<br />

CIT [1986] 24 Taxman 337 (SC) question of<br />

interest on sticky loans accrued to the assessee<br />

was involved: In Godhra Electricity Co. Ltd. v.<br />

CIT [1997] 91 Taxman 351 (SC) issue regarding

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!