The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS
The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS
28 battlefield for electoral win since 2007. The companies from Prizren, a city qualified as PDK’s Jerusalem during local elections in 2007, have benefitted much more during the last two years compared to companies in other municipalities. Research reveals a huge disbalance between Prizren companies, which benefitted from MEST and MTPT bids, and Prishtina ones. Whereas 61 Prishtina companies have benefitted over 121 million Euros from 123 bids, only 16 companies from Prizren have received 71 million through 42 bids. In the same manner, companies based in the municipalities known as PDK strongholds have benefitted multimillion amounts of Kosova budget compared to municipalities known to belong to political opponents such as LDK and AAK. Companies from Shtime, Skenderaj, Drenas, and Ferizxaj have received 30 mil Euros more than municipalities of Podujeva, Deçan, Istog, and Junik. Besides, when bids had been granted to the “neighboring” municipalities, usually a considerable amount has ended in the bank accounts of the companies close to the people of the party in power
The graph shows that municipality of Deçan and Istog have been left out of the trend and the reason why few companies in these to municipalities have been granted bids was, as you will see below, that they belong to people close to PDK. companies close to PDK Presenting the distribution of public funds based on municipalities from where the winning companies originate does not present a clear picture on who are the real benefiters of millions of Euros of tax-payers money. “Preportr” has noticed a relation between the connections of the company owners and the municipalities where the companies have been registered in when winning the bid. Also, “Preportr” has found that companies in the municipalities that have not been traditionally governed by PDK have won bids when acting in consortia with companies from the regions qualified as municipalities of PDK. Besides, “Preportr” has noticed cases when certain companies, 29 The Weakest Link of Kosovo’s Democracy forum 2015
- Page 1 and 2: forum The Weakest Link of Kosovo’
- Page 3: Table of Contents Introduction 5 Fr
- Page 6 and 7: 6 Forum 2015
- Page 8 and 9: 8 Constitution of Kosovo and the La
- Page 10 and 11: 10 “The aim is that, together wit
- Page 12 and 13: 9 12 The tendency to grant absolute
- Page 15 and 16: They should be tried! Hasan PrETEnI
- Page 17 and 18: Lack of Systematic Legislation for
- Page 19 and 20: 19 c) Without this legal infrastruc
- Page 21 and 22: eappointment of judges and prosecut
- Page 23 and 24: consequences Consequences of draggi
- Page 25 and 26: 25 Investigative Journalism From Pr
- Page 27: the Ministry of transport and the M
- Page 31 and 32: Media reporting on companies close
- Page 33 and 34: invested between January 2008 and D
- Page 35 and 36: to the municipalities that have alw
- Page 37 and 38: MEST and MTPT Award Bids to compani
- Page 39: “Preportr “contacted “Bajrama
- Page 42 and 43: 42 A comparison between companies t
- Page 44 and 45: 44 Euros for a project of “Constr
- Page 46 and 47: 46 List of Bid- Winning Companies a
- Page 48 and 49: 48 thousand to few million Euros. A
- Page 50 and 51: 50 A rETroSPEcTIVE oF ÇoHu! ProJEc
- Page 52 and 53: 52 its regular coverage. To convey
- Page 54 and 55: 54 Corruption and Organized Crime:
- Page 56 and 57: 56 Alliance for Future of Kosova (A
- Page 59 and 60: eport on 100 Days of “Çeku” Go
- Page 61 and 62: discontent for giving the ministers
- Page 63 and 64: and the minister never held himself
- Page 65: Post and Telecom of Kosova (PTK) On
- Page 68 and 69: 68 Main violations/failures: • Co
- Page 70 and 71: 70 vate corporation and as such est
- Page 72 and 73: 72 understood due to short time and
- Page 74 and 75: *** 74 director of Kosovapress news
- Page 76 and 77: 76 Procurement review Body As of Ju
<strong>The</strong> graph shows that municipality <strong>of</strong> Deçan and Istog have been left out <strong>of</strong> the trend<br />
and the reason why few companies in these to municipalities have been granted bids<br />
was, as you will see below, that they belong to people close to PDK.<br />
companies close to PDK<br />
Presenting the distribution <strong>of</strong> public funds based on municipalities from where the<br />
winning companies originate does not present a clear picture on who are the real<br />
benefiters <strong>of</strong> millions <strong>of</strong> Euros <strong>of</strong> tax-payers money. “Preportr” has noticed a relation<br />
between the connections <strong>of</strong> the company owners and the municipalities where the<br />
companies have been registered in when winning the bid. Also, “Preportr” has found<br />
that companies in the municipalities that have not been traditionally governed by PDK<br />
have won bids when acting in consortia with companies from the regions qualified as<br />
municipalities <strong>of</strong> PDK. Besides, “Preportr” has noticed cases when certain companies,<br />
29<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Weakest</strong> <strong>Link</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kosovo’s <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
forum 2015