The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS
The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS
The Weakest Link of Kosovo's Democracy - KFOS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Energy File – An Alarm for All <strong>of</strong> us<br />
107<br />
“We have not inherited earth from our fathers, we are borrowing it from our<br />
children”<br />
Dear representatives <strong>of</strong> Kosovo Institutions<br />
In this file you will find few <strong>of</strong> the most essential information on energy sector, the<br />
Kosova C 2100 project, and environmental and social problems that threaten Kosova<br />
for as long as a more sincere and thorough debate on investments on lignite coal<br />
energy production does not begin.<br />
<strong>The</strong> purpose <strong>of</strong> this file is to inform properly the Kosovar decision-makers on the committed<br />
violations, problems, and risks, contained in the power-plant Kosova C <strong>of</strong> 2100<br />
MW construction project. A series <strong>of</strong> documents, and in particular the study in front <strong>of</strong><br />
you “Kosovo C: A Modern Tale” present hundreds <strong>of</strong> arguments that the project needs<br />
to be revised if we are to know its true consequences.<br />
- Violation <strong>of</strong> Parliament’s decision on energy strategy – 2100 vs.<br />
1000 MW<br />
<strong>The</strong> Parliament <strong>of</strong> Kosova has adopted a strategy according to which energy facility to<br />
be constructed should not exceed a capacity <strong>of</strong> 1000 MW. Tendering and other documents<br />
prepared by the Steering Committee <strong>of</strong> the Kosova C project foresaw construction<br />
<strong>of</strong> 2100 MW capacity, which is the double <strong>of</strong> the one planned by the Parliament’s<br />
Strategy on Energy.<br />
As the representatives <strong>of</strong> Kosovar institutions have never respected the Parliament’s<br />
strategy so far and have never been sensitive to the project’s consequences. Bearing<br />
in mind the importance this project has for the future <strong>of</strong> Kosova, we propose:<br />
2. to send back the entire process <strong>of</strong> Kosova C2100 to the Parliament <strong>of</strong><br />
Kosova for revision<br />
3. to create the necessary sensitiveness among the decision-makers for<br />
the problems to be described in the following:<br />
- Proceeding with no strategic assessment on project’s environmental<br />
and social impact<br />
Many EU documents require impact assessment prior to initiation <strong>of</strong> any program that<br />
may have environmental implications. Kosova will face tremendous challenges when<br />
respecting <strong>of</strong> EU’s demands on environment become obligatory. It is a well known fact<br />
that the EU’s criteria are the strictest in the world in this field.<br />
To illustrate, we will refer to the European Parliament’s and the Council’s Directive<br />
2000 on Environment Impact Assessment <strong>of</strong> certain plans and programs.<br />
All the plans and programs with a potential impact assessment should become subject<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Weakest</strong> <strong>Link</strong> <strong>of</strong> Kosovo’s <strong>Democracy</strong><br />
forum 2015