einstein

Recommendations

Info

63. Specifically, the issue was whether the Entwurf field equations were invariant under the non-autonomous transformation to rotating coordinates in the case of the Minkowski metric in its standard diagonal form. Janssen 2004, 29. 64. Michele Besso memo to Einstein, Aug. 28, 1913; Janssen 2002; Norton 2000, 149; Einstein to Erwin Freundlich, Sept. 30, 1915. 65. Einstein to Hendrik Lorentz, Oct. 12, 1915. Einstein describes his October 1915 breakthroughs in a subsequent letter to Lorentz and another one to Arnold Sommerfeld. Einstein to Hendrik Lorentz, Jan. 1, 1916: “Trying times awaited me last fall as the inaccuracy of the older gravitational field equations gradually dawned on me. I had already discovered earlier that Mercury’s perihelion motion had come out too small. In addition, I found that the equations were not covariant for substitutions corresponding to a uniform rotation of the new reference system. Finally, I found that the consideration I made last year on the determination of Lagrange’s H function for the gravitational field was thoroughly illusory, in that it could easily be modified such that no restricting conditions had to be attached to H, thus making it possible to choose it completely freely. In this way I came to the conviction that introducing adapted systems was on the wrong track and that a more broad-reaching covariance, preferably a general covariance, must be required. Now general covariance has been achieved, whereby nothing is changed in the subsequent specialization of the frame of reference ...I had considered the current equations in essence already three years ago together with Grossmann, who had brought my attention to the Riemann tensor.” Einstein to Arnold Sommerfeld, Nov. 28, 1915: “In the last month I had one of the most stimulating and exhausting times of my life, and indeed also one of the most successful. For I realized that my existing gravitational field equations were untenable! The following indications led to this: 1) I proved that the gravitational field on a uniformly rotating system does not satisfy the field equations. 2) The motion of Mercury’s perihelion came to 18” rather than 45” per century. 3) The covariance considerations in my paper of last year do not yield the Hamiltonian function H. When it is properly generalized, it permits an arbitrary H. From this it was demonstrated that covariance with respect to ‘adapted’ coordinate systems was a flop.” 66. Norton 2000, 152. 67. There is a subtle divergence of opinion among the group of general relativity historians about the extent of his purported shift from the physical to the mathematical strategy in Oct.–Nov. 1915. John Norton has argued that Einstein’s “new tactic was to reverse his decision of 1913” and go back to a mathematical strategy, emphasizing a tensor analysis that would produce general covariance (Norton 2000, 151). Likewise, Jeroen van Dongen says the shift in tactics was clear: “Einstein immediately got hold of the way out of the Entwurf ’s quagmire: he returned to the mathematical requirement of general covariance that he had abandoned in the Zurich notebook” (van Dongen, 25). Both scholars produce quotes from Einstein’s later years in which he claims that the big lesson he learned was to trust a mathematical strategy. On the other side, Jürgen Renn and Michel Janssen say that Norton and van Dongen (and the older Einstein in his hazy memory) make too much of this shift. Physical considerations still played a major role in finding the final theory in Nov. 1915. “In our reconstruction, however, Einstein found his way back to the generally-covariant field equations by making one important adjustment to the Entwurf theory, a theory born almost entirely out of physical considerations . . . That mathematical considerations pointed in the same direction undoubtedly inspired confidence that this was the right direction, but guiding him along this path were physical not mathematical considerations” (Janssen and Renn, 13; the quote I use in the text is on p. 10). Also, Janssen 2004, 35: “Whatever he believed, said, or wrote about it later on, Einstein only discovered the mathematical high road to the Einstein field equations after he had already found these equations at the end of a poorly paved road through physics.” 68. Einstein to Arnold Sommerfeld, Nov. 28, 1915. 69. Einstein, “On the General Theory of Relativity,” Nov. 4, 1915, CPAE 6: 21. 70. Einstein to Michele Besso, Nov. 17, 1915; Einstein to Arnold Sommerfeld, Nov. 28, 1915. 71. Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Nov. 4, 1915. 72. Einstein to David Hilbert, Nov. 7, 1915. 73. Overbye, 290. 74. Einstein, “On the General Theory of Relativity (Addendum),” Nov. 11, 1915, CPAE 6: 22; Renn and Sauer 2006, 276; Pais 1982, 252. 75. Einstein to David Hilbert, Nov. 12, 1915. 76. Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Nov. 15, 1915; Einstein to Mileva Mari , Nov. 15, 1915; Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Nov. 15, 1915 (released in 2006 and printed in supplement to vol. 10). 77. Einstein to David Hilbert, Nov. 15, 1915. 78. Einstein, “Explanation of the Perihelion Motion of Mercury from the General Theory of Relativity,” Nov. 18, 1915, CPAE 6: 24. 79. Pais 1982, 253; Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest, Jan. 17, 1916; Einstein to Arnold Sommerfeld, Dec. 9, 1915. 80. Einstein to David Hilbert, Nov. 18, 1915. 81. David Hilbert to Einstein, Nov. 19, 1915. 82. The equation has been expressed in many ways. The one I use follows the formulation Einstein used in his 1921 Princeton lectures. The entire left-hand side of the equation can be expressed more compactly as what is now known as the Einstein tensor: G μν.. 83. Overbye, 293; Aczel 1999, 117; archive.ncsa.uiuc.edu/Cyberia/NumRel/Ein steinEquations.html#intro. A variation of Wheeler’s quote is on p. 5 of the book he coauthored with Charles Misner and Kip Thorne, Gravitation. 84. Greene 2004, 74. 85. Einstein, “The Foundations of the General Theory of Relativity,”Annalen der Physik (Mar. 20, 1916), CPAE 6: 30. 86. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Nov. 26, 1915; Einstein to Michele Besso, Nov. 30, 1915. 87. Thorne, 119. 88. For an analysis of Hilbert’s contribution, see Sauer 1999, 529–575; Sauer 2005, 577–590. Papers describing Hilbert’s revisions include Corry, Renn, and Stachel; Sauer 2005. For a flavor of the controversy, see also John Earman and Clark Glymour, “Einstein and Hilbert:Two Months in the History of General Relativity,”Archive for History of Exact Sciences (1978): 291; A. A. Logunov, M. A. Mestvirishvili, and V. A. Petrov, “How Were the Hilbert-Einstein Equations Discovered?,” Uspekhi Fizicheskikh Nauk 174, no. 6 (June 2004): 663–678; Christopher Jon Bjerknes, Albert Einstein:The Incorrigible Plagiarist , available at home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/AEIPBook.htm; John Stachel, “Anti-Einstein Sentiment Surfaces Again,”Physics World , Apr. 2003, physicsweb.org/articles/review/16/4/2/1; Christopher Jon Bjerknes, “The Author of Albert Einstein: The Incorrigible Plagiarist Responds to John Stachel’s Personal Attack,” home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/Response.htm; Friedwardt Winterberg, “On ‘Belated Decision in the Hilbert-Einstein Priority Dispute,’ ”Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung A, (Oct. 2004): 715–719, www.physics.unr.edu/faculty/winterberg/Hilbert-Einstein.pdf; David Rowe, “Einstein Meets Hilbert: At the Crossroads of Physics and Mathematics,”Physics in Perspective 3, no. 4 (Nov. 2001): 379.
89. Reid, 142. Although this comment is cited in other secondary sources as well, Tilman Sauer of the Einstein Papers Project, who is writing a book on Hilbert, says he has never found a primary source for it. 90. Einstein to David Hilbert, Dec. 20, 1915. 91. Einstein to Arnold Sommerfeld, Dec. 9, 1915; Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Nov. 26, 1915. 92. It is a contentious question as to whether general relativity actually succeeds in making all forms of motion and all frames of reference equivalent. It can certainly be said that two observers in nonuniform relative motion can each legitimately view himself as “at rest” and the other as affected by a gravitational field. That does not necessarily mean (as Einstein sometimes seemed to believe and at other times not) that two observers in nonuniform relative motion are always physically equivalent, especially when it comes to rotation. See, for example, Norton 1995b, 223–245; Janssen 2004, 8–12; Don Howard,“Point Coincidences and Pointer Coincidences,” in Goenner et al. 1999, 463; Robert Rynasiewicz, “Kretschmann’s Analysis of Covariance and Relativity Principles,” in Goenner et al. 1999, 431; Dennis Diek, “Another Look at General Covariance and the Equivalence of Reference Frames,”Studies in the History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 37 (Mar. 2006): 174. 93. Fölsing, 374; Clark, 252. 94. Einstein to Michele Besso, Dec. 10, 1915. CHAPTER TEN: DIVORCE 1. Michele Besso to Einstein, Nov. 29, 1915; Einstein to Michele Besso, Nov. 30, 1915; Neffe, 192. 2. Hans Albert Einstein to Einstein, before Nov. 30, 1915; Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Nov. 30, 1915. 3. Michele Besso to Einstein, Nov. 30, 1915. See also Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Dec. 4, 1915: “The boy’s soul is being systematically poisoned to make sure that he doesn’t trust me.” 4. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Dec. 1 and 10, 1915. 5. Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Dec. 23 and 25, 1915. Einstein wrote a similar postcard to Hans Albert on Dec. 18, 1915. Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Mar. 11, 1916. 6. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Nov. 26, 1915; Einstein to Michele Besso, Jan. 3, 1916. 7. Overbye, 300. 8. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Feb. 6, 1916. 9. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Mar. 12, Apr. 1, 1916; Neffe, 194. 10. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Apr. 1 and 8, 1916; Einstein to Michele Besso, Apr. 6, 1916; Michele Besso to Heinrich Zangger, Apr. 12, 1916, CPAE 8: 211 (German edition), footnote 2. 11. Einstein to Elsa Einstein, Apr. 12 and 15, 1916. See also Einstein to Elsa Einstein, Apr. 10, 1916, in the sealed family correspondence released in 2006, CPAE 8: 211a: “My relationship with him is becoming very warm.” 12. Einstein to Elsa Einstein, Apr. 21, 1916. See also Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, July 11, 1916: “Following an exceedingly nice Easter excursion, the subsequent days in Zurich brought on a complete chilling in a way that is not quite explicable to me.” 13. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, July 11, 1916; Einstein to Michele Besso, July 14, 1916. See CPAE 8: 233 (German edition), footnote 4, for Zangger being the other person referred to in the letter. 14. Pauline Einstein to Elsa Einstein, Aug. 6, 1916, in Overbye, 301. 15. Einstein to Michele Besso, July 14, 1916; Michele Besso to Einstein, July 17, 1916; CPAE 8: 239 (German version), footnote 2. 16. Einstein to Michele Besso, July 21, 1916, two letters. 17. CPAE 8: 241 (German edition), footnotes 3, 4; Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, July 25, 1916; Heinrich Zangger to Michele Besso, July 31, 1916. 18. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Aug. 18, 1916; Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, July 25, 1916. See also Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Mar. 10, 1917. 19. Einstein to Michele Besso, Aug. 24, 1916; Einstein to Hans Albert Einstein, Sept. 26, 1916. 20. Hans Albert Einstein to Einstein, before Nov. 26, 1916. 21. Einstein to Michele Besso, Oct. 31, 1916. 22. Einstein to Helene Savi , Sept. 8, 1916. 23. Einstein, “The Foundation of the General Theory of Relativity,” Mar. 20, 1916, CPAE 6: 30. 24. Einstein, On the Special and the General Theory of Relativity , Dec. 1916, CPAE 6: 42, and many popular editions; Michelmore, 63. For an Internet version of Einstein’s book, see bartleby.com/173/or www.gutenberg.org/etext/5001. 25. Einstein, “Principles of Research,” 1918, in Einstein 1954, 224. 26. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Jan. 16, 1917; Clark, 241. 27. Clark, 248; Highfield and Carter, 183; Overbye, 327; Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest, Feb. 14, 1917; Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Dec. 6, 1917. 28. Einstein to Michele Besso, Mar. 9, 1917; Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, Feb. 16 and Mar. 10, 1917. 29. Einstein to Paul Ehrenfest, May 25, 1917. 30. Einstein to Heinrich Zangger, June 12, 1917. 31. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Jan. 31, 1918. 32. Mileva Mari to Einstein, Feb. 9, 1918, from family trust correspondence, CPAE 8: 461a, in supplement to vol. 10. 33. Mileva Mari to Einstein, after Feb. 6, 1918. The Feb. 9 letter from the family trust correspondence, footnote 32 above, was unsealed in 2006. It clearly comes before the one that was dated “after Feb. 6” by the Einstein papers editors. 34. Overbye, 338–339. 35. Mileva Mari to Einstein, Apr. 22, 1918. 36. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Apr. 15, 23, 26, 1918. 37. Maja Winteler-Einstein to Einstein, Mar. 6, 1918, family foundation correspondence, unsealed in 2006, CPAE 8: 475b, in supplement to vol. 10. 38. Einstein to Anna Besso, after Mar. 4, 1918. 39. Anna Besso to Einstein, after Mar. 4, 1918. 40. Mileva Mari to Einstein, before May 23, 1918; Einstein to Mileva Mari , June 4, 1918. See also Vero Besso (Anna and Michele’s son) to
Page 2 and 3:
ALSO BY WALTER ISAACSON A Benjamin
Page 4 and 5:
SIMON & SCHUSTER Rockefeller Center
Page 6 and 7:
In Santa Barbara, 1933 Life is like
Page 8 and 9:
CHAPTER FOURTEEN Nobel Laureate, 19
Page 10 and 11:
their countless acts of support ove
Page 12 and 13:
ABRAHAM FLEXNER (1866-1959). Americ
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER ONE THE LIGHT-BEAM RIDER
Page 18 and 19:
The Swabian CHAPTER TWO CHILDHOOD 1
Page 20 and 21:
during the years he lived alone in
Page 22 and 23:
elementary school seemed to me like
Page 24:
fulfill my wishes and expectations,
Page 27 and 28:
taken out of the black case. It pro
Page 29 and 30:
one of her female friends in Zurich
Page 32 and 33:
Summer Vacation, 1900 CHAPTER FOUR
Page 34 and 35:
The first of these papers was on a
Page 36 and 37:
Lake Como, May 1901 “You absolute
Page 38 and 39:
molecular forces, which used calcul
Page 40 and 41:
His office in Bern’s new Postal a
Page 42 and 43:
affection, and it concluded on that
Page 45 and 46:
Turn of the Century CHAPTER FIVE TH
Page 47 and 48:
These packets or bundles of energy
Page 49:
though it did not help him get an a
Page 52 and 53:
elative to the medium (the water or
Page 54 and 55:
finally he added, “I guess I just
Page 56 and 57:
Suppose that at the exact instant (
Page 58 and 59:
With all this talk of distance and
Page 60:
his one-sentence drunken postcard t
Page 63 and 64:
was better suited to theorizing. Fo
Page 65 and 66:
Adler made sure that the Zurich aut
Page 68 and 69:
Zurich, 1909 CHAPTER EIGHT THE WAND
Page 70 and 71:
invitation to stay with Lorentz and
Page 72 and 73:
As Einstein wandered around Europe
Page 74 and 75:
The visitors made their case during
Page 76:
Mari accepted the terms. When Haber
Page 79 and 80:
When Einstein moved back to Zurich
Page 81 and 82:
indistinguishable from a case where
Page 83 and 84:
Haber’s son in math. 45 But when
Page 85 and 86:
Part of Einstein’s genius was his
Page 87:
the Annalen der Physik, “The gene
Page 90 and 91:
e a heavy blow for my boys. Therefo
Page 92 and 93:
“The Nobel Prize—in the event o
Page 94 and 95:
Germany’s new left-wing governmen
Page 97 and 98:
Cosmology and Black Holes, 1917 CHA
Page 99 and 100:
quanta involved probability rather
Page 102 and 103:
“Lights All Askew” CHAPTER TWEL
Page 104 and 105:
celebrity, were thrilled that the n
Page 106 and 107:
a “single-minded and single-hande
Page 109 and 110:
Kinship CHAPTER THIRTEEN THE WANDER
Page 111 and 112:
(There was one odd coda to this eve
Page 113 and 114:
Einstein drew packed crowds whereve
Page 115 and 116:
1920s was not a good place or time
Page 118 and 119:
The 1921 Prize CHAPTER FOURTEEN NOB
Page 120 and 121:
photoelectrical effect has been ext
Page 122 and 123:
Atoms emit radiation in a spontaneo
Page 124 and 125:
An additional step was taken by ano
Page 127 and 128:
The Quest CHAPTER FIFTEEN UNIFIED F
Page 129 and 130:
even now. He also gave an interview
Page 131 and 132:
Its shortcoming was that it “make
Page 134 and 135:
Caputh CHAPTER SIXTEEN TURNING FIFT
Page 136 and 137:
later declared. Although she could
Page 138 and 139:
Einstein said, “encases the mind
Page 140 and 141:
His fears were realized. The confer
Page 143 and 144:
CHAPTER SEVENTEEN EINSTEIN’S GOD
Page 145:
with, his scientific work. “The c
Page 148 and 149:
Christ Church, his college at Oxfor
Page 150 and 151:
new chancellor of Germany. Einstein
Page 152 and 153:
directed to the cottage amid the du
Page 154 and 155:
friends. Most of it was about poor
Page 157 and 158:
Princeton CHAPTER NINETEEN AMERICA
Page 159 and 160:
Flexner’s interference infuriated
Page 161 and 162:
the mailman.” 38 “The professor
Page 163:
Nassau Inn refused her a room. So E
Page 166 and 167:
Wolfgang Pauli wrote Heisenberg a l
Page 168 and 169:
Bell was less than comfortable with
Page 170 and 171:
Was Infeld right? Was tenacity the
Page 173 and 174: The Letter CHAPTER TWENTY-ONE THE B
Page 175 and 176: the progress being made in producin
Page 177: Americans rush to complete one? And
Page 180 and 181: So Einstein sought to make it clear
Page 182 and 183: monopolies,” they wrote. They den
Page 184: In it he argued that unrestrained c
Page 187 and 188: ather than (or in addition to) expa
Page 189 and 190: he read aloud to her. Sometimes the
Page 192 and 193: The Rosenbergs CHAPTER TWENTY-FOUR
Page 194 and 195: need to keep thrusting himself into
Page 197 and 198: Intimations of Mortality CHAPTER TW
Page 199 and 200: peace. 23 Einstein went in to work
Page 201 and 202: studying the DNA from Einstein’s
Page 203 and 204: SOURCES EINSTEIN’S CORRESPONDENCE
Page 205 and 206: Greene, Brian. 1999. The Elegant Un
Page 207 and 208: ———. 2005b. “Standing on th
Page 209 and 210: NOTES Einstein’s letters and writ
Page 211 and 212: CHAPTER THREE: THE ZURICH POLYTECHN
Page 213 and 214: 55. Einstein to Mileva Mari , Nov.
Page 215 and 216: Earman, Clark Glymour, and Robert R
Page 217 and 218: 61. Einstein to Maurice Solovine, u
Page 219 and 220: 14. Einstein to Hendrik Lorentz, Ja
Page 221: 25. Einstein, “On the Foundations
Page 225 and 226: die Theorie stimmt doch.” 23. Max
Page 227 and 228: 39. “Einstein Sees End of Time an
Page 229 and 230: sold the house but not the right to
Page 231 and 232: 34. Einstein, “Speech to Professo
Page 233 and 234: 65. Einstein, “The 1932 Disarmame
Page 235 and 236: 10-255. 52. Einstein to Herbert Sam
Page 237 and 238: CHAPTER TWENTY: QUANTUM ENTANGLEMEN
Page 239 and 240: Szilárd Refrigerators,”Scientifi
Page 241 and 242: 44. Einstein, “Why Socialism?,”
Page 243 and 244: 1. Johanna Fantova journal, Mar. 19
Page 245 and 246: Page numbers in italics refer to il
Page 247 and 248: Bose-Einstein statistics, 327-28 Bo
Page 249 and 250: Edison, Thomas, 6, 299 Edison test,
Page 251 and 252: nervous strain of, 184, 217-18, 255
Page 253 and 254: as cosmologist, 223-24, 248, 249-62
Page 255 and 256: Feynman, Richard, 515, 584n “Fiel
Page 257 and 258: Hertz, Paul, 208 Hibben, John, 298
Page 259 and 260: Konenkov, Sergei, 436, 503 Konenkov
Page 261 and 262: Matthau, Walter, 13 Maxwell, James
Page 263 and 264: nuclear weapons, 482-84, 487-95, 53
Page 265 and 266: entanglement in, 454, 455, 458-59
Page 267 and 268: Remembrance of Things Past (Proust)
Page 269 and 270: superposition, 456-60 surface tensi
Page 271 and 272: Whitehead, Alfred North, 261 “Why
Page 273 and 274:
ILLUSTRATION CREDITS Numbers in rom
Page 275 and 276:
5 With Mileva and Hans Albert, 1905
Page 277 and 278:
12 Hiking in Switzerland with Madam
Page 279 and 280:
18 The 1927 Solvay Conference 19 Re
Page 281 and 282:
23 Werner Heisenberg 24 Erwin Schr
Page 283 and 284:
29 With Elsa and her daughter Margo
Page 285 and 286:
34 Welcoming Hans Albert to America
Page 287 and 288:
* The official name of the institut
Page 289 and 290:
* The letters were discovered by Jo
Page 291 and 292:
* A person “at rest” on the equ
Page 293 and 294:
* If the source of sound is rushing
Page 295 and 296:
* The German phrase he used was “
Page 297 and 298:
* She was born Elsa Einstein, becam
Page 299 and 300:
* See chapter 7. For purposes of th
Page 301 and 302:
* Here’s how it works. If you are
Page 303 and 304:
* Einstein’s salary after tax was
Page 305 and 306:
* See chapter 14 for Einstein’s d
Page 307 and 308:
* I have used the translation prefe
Page 309 and 310:
* Robert Andrews Millikan would win
Page 311 and 312:
* The de Broglie wavelength of a ba
Page 313 and 314:
* From his 1905 special relativity
Page 315 and 316:
* As Eddington showed, the cosmolog
Page 317 and 318:
* There are two related concepts th
show all

einstein

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?