11.01.2013 Views

einstein

einstein

einstein

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Quest<br />

CHAPTER FIFTEEN<br />

UNIFIED FIELD THEORIES<br />

1923–1931<br />

With Bohr at the 1930 Solvay Conference<br />

While others continued to develop quantum mechanics, undaunted by the uncertainties at its core, Einstein persevered in his lonelier quest for a<br />

more complete explanation of the universe—a unified field theory that would tie together electricity and magnetism and gravity and quantum<br />

mechanics. In the past, his genius had been in finding missing links between different theories. The opening sentences of his 1905 general relativity<br />

and light quanta papers were such examples.*<br />

He hoped to extend the gravitational field equations of general relativity so that they would describe the electromagnetic field as well. “The mind<br />

striving after unification cannot be satisfied that two fields should exist which, by their nature, are quite independent,” Einstein explained in his Nobel<br />

lecture. “We seek a mathematically unified field theory in which the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field are interpreted only as different<br />

components or manifestations of the same uniform field.” 1<br />

Such a unified theory, he hoped, might make quantum mechanics compatible with relativity. He publicly enlisted Planck in this task with a toast at<br />

his mentor’s sixtieth birthday celebration in 1918: “May he succeed in uniting quantum theory with electrodynamics and mechanics in a single<br />

logical system.” 2<br />

Einstein’s quest was primarily a procession of false steps, marked by increasing mathematical complexity, that began with his reacting to the<br />

false steps of others. The first was by the mathematical physicist Hermann Weyl, who in 1918 proposed a way to extend the geometry of general<br />

relativity that would, so it seemed, serve as a geometrization of the electromagnetic field as well.<br />

Einstein was initially impressed. “It is a first-class stroke of genius,” he told Weyl. But he had one problem with it: “I have not been able to settle<br />

my measuring-rod objection yet.” 3<br />

Under Weyl’s theory, measuring rods and clocks would vary depending on the path they took through space. But experimental observations<br />

showed no such phenomenon. In his next letter, after two more days of reflection, Einstein pricked his bubbles of praise with a wry putdown. “Your<br />

chain of reasoning is so wonderfully self-contained,” he wrote Weyl. “Except for agreeing with reality, it is certainly a grand intellectual<br />

achievement.” 4<br />

Next came a proposal in 1919 by Theodor Kaluza, a mathematics professor in Königsberg, that a fifth dimension be added to the four<br />

dimensions of spacetime. Kaluza further posited that this added spatial dimension was circular, meaning that if you head in its direction you get<br />

back to where you started, just like walking around the circumference of a cylinder.<br />

Kaluza did not try to describe the physical reality or location of this added spatial dimension. He was, after all, a mathematician, so he didn’t have<br />

to. Instead, he devised it as a mathematical device. The metric of Einstein’s four-dimensional spacetime required ten quantities to describe all the<br />

possible coordinate relationships for any point. Kaluza knew that fifteen such quantities are needed to specify the geometry for a five-dimensional<br />

realm. 5<br />

When he played with the math of this complex construction, Kaluza found that four of the extra five quantities could be used to produce Maxwell’s<br />

electromagnetic equations. At least mathematically, this might be a way to produce a field theory unifying gravity and electromagnetism.<br />

Once again, Einstein was both impressed and critical. “A five-dimensional cylinder world never dawned on me,” he wrote Kaluza. “At first glance I<br />

like your idea enormously.” 6 Unfortunately, there was no reason to believe that most of this math actually had any basis in physical reality. With the<br />

luxury of being a pure mathematician, Kaluza admitted this and challenged the physicists to figure it out. “It is still hard to believe that all of these<br />

relations in their virtually unsurpassed formal unity should amount to the mere alluring play of a capricious accident,” he wrote. “Should more than an<br />

empty mathematical formalism be found to reside behind these presumed connections, we would then face a new triumph of Einstein’s general<br />

relativity.”<br />

By then Einstein had become a convert to the faith in mathematical formalism, which had proven so useful in his final push toward general<br />

relativity. Once a few issues were sorted out, he helped Kaluza get his paper published in 1921, and followed up later with his own pieces.<br />

The next contribution came from the physicist Oskar Klein, son of Sweden’s first rabbi and a student of Niels Bohr. Klein saw a unified field<br />

theory not only as a way to unite gravity and electromagnetism, but he also hoped it might explain some of the mysteries lurking in quantum<br />

mechanics. Perhaps it could even come up with a way to find “hidden variables” that could eliminate the uncertainty.<br />

Klein was more a physicist than a mathematician, so he focused more than Kaluza had on what the physical reality of a fourth spatial dimension

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!