einstein
einstein
einstein
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The Quest<br />
CHAPTER FIFTEEN<br />
UNIFIED FIELD THEORIES<br />
1923–1931<br />
With Bohr at the 1930 Solvay Conference<br />
While others continued to develop quantum mechanics, undaunted by the uncertainties at its core, Einstein persevered in his lonelier quest for a<br />
more complete explanation of the universe—a unified field theory that would tie together electricity and magnetism and gravity and quantum<br />
mechanics. In the past, his genius had been in finding missing links between different theories. The opening sentences of his 1905 general relativity<br />
and light quanta papers were such examples.*<br />
He hoped to extend the gravitational field equations of general relativity so that they would describe the electromagnetic field as well. “The mind<br />
striving after unification cannot be satisfied that two fields should exist which, by their nature, are quite independent,” Einstein explained in his Nobel<br />
lecture. “We seek a mathematically unified field theory in which the gravitational field and the electromagnetic field are interpreted only as different<br />
components or manifestations of the same uniform field.” 1<br />
Such a unified theory, he hoped, might make quantum mechanics compatible with relativity. He publicly enlisted Planck in this task with a toast at<br />
his mentor’s sixtieth birthday celebration in 1918: “May he succeed in uniting quantum theory with electrodynamics and mechanics in a single<br />
logical system.” 2<br />
Einstein’s quest was primarily a procession of false steps, marked by increasing mathematical complexity, that began with his reacting to the<br />
false steps of others. The first was by the mathematical physicist Hermann Weyl, who in 1918 proposed a way to extend the geometry of general<br />
relativity that would, so it seemed, serve as a geometrization of the electromagnetic field as well.<br />
Einstein was initially impressed. “It is a first-class stroke of genius,” he told Weyl. But he had one problem with it: “I have not been able to settle<br />
my measuring-rod objection yet.” 3<br />
Under Weyl’s theory, measuring rods and clocks would vary depending on the path they took through space. But experimental observations<br />
showed no such phenomenon. In his next letter, after two more days of reflection, Einstein pricked his bubbles of praise with a wry putdown. “Your<br />
chain of reasoning is so wonderfully self-contained,” he wrote Weyl. “Except for agreeing with reality, it is certainly a grand intellectual<br />
achievement.” 4<br />
Next came a proposal in 1919 by Theodor Kaluza, a mathematics professor in Königsberg, that a fifth dimension be added to the four<br />
dimensions of spacetime. Kaluza further posited that this added spatial dimension was circular, meaning that if you head in its direction you get<br />
back to where you started, just like walking around the circumference of a cylinder.<br />
Kaluza did not try to describe the physical reality or location of this added spatial dimension. He was, after all, a mathematician, so he didn’t have<br />
to. Instead, he devised it as a mathematical device. The metric of Einstein’s four-dimensional spacetime required ten quantities to describe all the<br />
possible coordinate relationships for any point. Kaluza knew that fifteen such quantities are needed to specify the geometry for a five-dimensional<br />
realm. 5<br />
When he played with the math of this complex construction, Kaluza found that four of the extra five quantities could be used to produce Maxwell’s<br />
electromagnetic equations. At least mathematically, this might be a way to produce a field theory unifying gravity and electromagnetism.<br />
Once again, Einstein was both impressed and critical. “A five-dimensional cylinder world never dawned on me,” he wrote Kaluza. “At first glance I<br />
like your idea enormously.” 6 Unfortunately, there was no reason to believe that most of this math actually had any basis in physical reality. With the<br />
luxury of being a pure mathematician, Kaluza admitted this and challenged the physicists to figure it out. “It is still hard to believe that all of these<br />
relations in their virtually unsurpassed formal unity should amount to the mere alluring play of a capricious accident,” he wrote. “Should more than an<br />
empty mathematical formalism be found to reside behind these presumed connections, we would then face a new triumph of Einstein’s general<br />
relativity.”<br />
By then Einstein had become a convert to the faith in mathematical formalism, which had proven so useful in his final push toward general<br />
relativity. Once a few issues were sorted out, he helped Kaluza get his paper published in 1921, and followed up later with his own pieces.<br />
The next contribution came from the physicist Oskar Klein, son of Sweden’s first rabbi and a student of Niels Bohr. Klein saw a unified field<br />
theory not only as a way to unite gravity and electromagnetism, but he also hoped it might explain some of the mysteries lurking in quantum<br />
mechanics. Perhaps it could even come up with a way to find “hidden variables” that could eliminate the uncertainty.<br />
Klein was more a physicist than a mathematician, so he focused more than Kaluza had on what the physical reality of a fourth spatial dimension