einstein

photoelectrical effect has been extremely rigorously tested by the American Millikan* and his pupils and passed the test brilliantly,” he said.
“Einstein’s law has become the basis of quantitative photo-chemistry in the same way as Faraday’s law is the basis of electro-chemistry.” 13
Einstein gave his official acceptance speech the following July at a Swedish science conference with King Gustav Adolf V in attendance. He
spoke not about the photoelectric effect, but about relativity, and he concluded by emphasizing the importance of his new passion, finding a unified
field theory that would reconcile general relativity with electromagnetic theory and, if possible, with quantum mechanics. 14
The prize money that year amounted to 121,572 Swedish kronor, or $32,250, which was more than ten times the annual salary of the average
professor at the time. As per his divorce agreement with Mari , Einstein had part of it sent directly to Zurich to reside in a trust for her and their
sons, and the rest went into an American account with the interest directed for her use.
This prompted another row. Hans Albert complained that the trust arrangement, which had previously been agreed to, made only the interest on
the money accessible to the family. Once again, Zangger intervened and calmed the dispute. Einstein jokingly wrote to his sons, “You all will be so
rich that some fine day I may ask you for a loan.”The money was eventually used by Mari to buy three homes with rental apartments in Zurich. 15
Newton’s Bucket and the Ether Reincarnated
“Anything truly novel is invented only during one’s youth,” Einstein lamented to a friend after finishing his work on general relativity and cosmology.
“Later one becomes more experienced, more famous—and more blockheaded.” 16
Einstein turned 40 in 1919, the year that the eclipse observations made him world-famous. For the next six years, he continued to make
important contributions to quantum theory. But after that, as we shall see, he would begin to seem, if not blockheaded, at least a bit stubborn as he
resisted quantum mechanics and embarked on a long, lonely, and unsuccessful effort to devise a unified theory that would subsume it into a more
deterministic framework.
Over the ensuing years, researchers would discover new forces in nature, besides electromagnetism and gravity, and also new particles. These
would make Einstein’s attempts at unification all the more complex. But he would find himself less familiar with the latest data in experimental
physics, and he thus would no longer have the same intuitive feel for how to wrest from nature her fundamental principles.
If Einstein had retired after the eclipse observations and devoted himself to sailing for the remaining thirty-six years of his life, would science have
suffered? Yes, for even though most of his attacks on quantum mechanics did not prove to be warranted, he did serve to strengthen the theory by
coming up with a few advances and also, less intentionally, by his ingenious but futile efforts to poke holes in it.
That raises another question: Why was Einstein so much more creative before the age of 40 than after? Partly, it is an occupational hazard of
mathematicians and theoretical physicists to have their great breakthroughs before turning 40. 17 “The intellect gets crippled,” Einstein explained to
a friend, “but glittering renown is still draped around the calcified shell.” 18
More specifically, Einstein’s scientific successes had come in part from his rebelliousness. There was a link between his creativity and his
willingness to defy authority. He had no sentimental attachment to the old order, thus was energized by upending it. His stubbornness had worked to
his advantage.
But now, just as he had traded his youthful bohemian attitudes for the comforts of a bourgeois home, he had become wedded to the faith that
field theories could preserve the certainties and determinism of classical science. His stubbornness henceforth would work to his disadvantage.
It was a fate that he had begun fearing years before, not long after he finished his famous flurry of 1905 papers. “Soon I will reach the age of
stagnation and sterility when one laments the revolutionary spirit of the young,” he had worried to his colleague from the Olympia Academy, Maurice
Solovine. 19
Now, many triumphs later, there were young revolutionaries who felt this fate had indeed befallen him. In one of his most revealing remarks about
himself, Einstein lamented, “To punish me for my contempt of authority, Fate has made me an authority myself.” 20
Thus it is not surprising that, during the 1920s, Einstein found himself scaling back on some of his bolder earlier ideas. For example, in his 1905
special relativity paper he had famously dismissed the concept of the ether as “superfluous.” But after he finished his theory of general relativity, he
concluded that the gravitational potentials in that theory characterized the physical qualities of empty space and served as a medium that could
transmit disturbances. He began referring to this as a new way to conceive of an ether.“I agree with you that the general relativity theory admits of
an ether hypothesis,” he wrote Lorentz in 1916. 21
In a lecture in Leiden in May 1920, Einstein publicly proposed a reincarnation, though not a rebirth, of the ether. “More careful reflection teaches
us, however, that the special theory of relativity does not compel us to deny ether,” he said. “We may assume the existence of an ether, only we
must give up ascribing a definite state of motion to it.”
This revised view was justified, he said, by the results of the general theory of relativity. He made clear that his new ether was different from the
old one, which had been conceived as a medium that could ripple and thus explain how light waves moved through space. Instead, he was
reintroducing the idea in order to explain rotation and inertia.
Perhaps he could have saved some confusion if he had chosen a different term. But in his speech he made clear that he was reintroducing the
word intentionally:
To deny the ether is ultimately to assume that empty space has no physical qualities whatever. The fundamental facts of mechanics do not
harmonize with this view . . . Besides observable objects, another thing, which is not perceptible, must be looked upon as real, to enable
acceleration or rotation to be looked upon as something real . . . The conception of the ether has again acquired an intelligible content,
although this content differs widely from that of the ether of the mechanical wave theory of light ... According to the general theory of relativity,
space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, there exists an ether. Space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not
only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor
therefore any spacetime intervals in the physical sense. But this ether may not be thought of as endowed with the qualities of ponderable
media, as consisting of parts which may be tracked through time. The idea of motion may not be applied to it. 22
So what was this reincarnated ether, and what did it mean for Mach’s principle and for the question raised by Newton’s bucket?* Einstein had
initially enthused that general relativity explained rotation as being simply a motion relative to other objects in space, just as Mach had argued. In
other words, if you were inside a bucket that was dangling in empty space, with no other objects in the universe, there would be no way to tell if you
were spinning or not. Einstein even wrote to Mach saying he should be pleased that his principle was supported by general relativity.
Einstein had asserted this claim in a letter to Schwarzschild, the brilliant young scientist who had written to him from Germany’s Russian front