10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Note:<br />

(1) Preliminary figures.<br />

Author's research based on<br />

- Economic Surveys, 1967-1978.<br />

-353-<br />

coincided with the start of the 1976 - 1980 Development Plan.<br />

NoteworthV are the causes of the rise in expenditures and the<br />

(relative) decrease in revenues. Increasing costs of living,<br />

caused partly by an imported inflation, in 1975/1976 caused the<br />

Government to increase the salaries of the civil service, a<br />

decision which was also influenced by the booming revenues<br />

from the iron ore sector and the Maritime Program in the<br />

preceding year. <strong>The</strong> partial substitution of an elaborate system<br />

of fringe benefits enjoyed by civil servants by raises in their<br />

salaries further contributed to an accelerated rise in<br />

personnel costs and recurrent expenditures. Large outlays on<br />

projects with a questionable priority from the point of view<br />

of development, combined with these increased personnel costs,<br />

caused the total government expenditures to double from $ 133.1<br />

million in 1975 to $ 266.0 million in the Fiscal Year 1977/78<br />

(See Table 49).<br />

Income from the concession sector which in 1975 still had represented<br />

38.5 percent of domestic revenues fell to 20 percent in<br />

1977 (see Table 36). <strong>The</strong> drop in revenues from the concession<br />

sector coincided with the steeply increased expenditures. Lack<br />

of control over both domestic revenues and expenditures subsequently<br />

resulted in yearly increasing budget deficits. <strong>The</strong> budget<br />

deficit expected for the Fiscal Year 1978/79 had reached<br />

the $ 100 million mark and was practically equal to the total<br />

annual government expenditures of less than five years before.<br />

A significant portion of the expenditures of the late 197O's was<br />

O.A.U. related. Estimates of the expenditures made in view of<br />

the hosting of the O.A.U. Summit meeting vary roughly speaking<br />

between $ 100 million and $ 200 million but is likely that the<br />

latter figure will be the more correct one. <strong>The</strong>se expenditures<br />

include the costs of constructing and furnishing a Conference<br />

Center, Hotel Africa, bungalows for the African Heads of State as<br />

well as housing for their respective delegations, a new Ministry<br />

of Foreign Affairs, and the purchase of a Boeing 737 Presidential<br />

aircraft. Among the O.A.U. related expenditures on projects which<br />

the country would anyhow have needed in the long run are a new<br />

terminal building on the international airfieldj Robertsfield<br />

International Airport, the resurfacing of the 42 miles of highway<br />

between the international airport and the nation's capital, road<br />

improvements on Bushrod Island ( a suburb of Monrovia which lies<br />

on the way to the O.A.U. Conference Center in Virginia, some 24<br />

miles from the capital). Further, a new (second) bridge across<br />

the Mesurado River, linking "Crown Hill" in Monrovia with

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!