10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-338-<br />

an increase of logging activities. This, in turn, would have an<br />

impact on employment opportunities, the diversification of the<br />

economy as well as the Government's revenues.<br />

<strong>The</strong> allocation of resources over the various sectors of the economy<br />

is presented in Annex 23. <strong>The</strong> absence of any allocations for<br />

Industry & Commerce is explained by the Government's reliance<br />

upon foreign capital through its <strong>Open</strong> <strong>Door</strong> Policy. Officially the<br />

objective was to .<br />

"encourage industrialization by conti.nuati.on of x.h.e Upen<br />

door Policy" (70).<br />

<strong>The</strong> sectoral distribution of resources, presented by the<br />

Government in its Four Year Development Plan, is however grossly<br />

misleading in respect of the beneficiaries of the expenditures.<br />

A thorough study of the Development Plan showed that only somewhat<br />

over 30 per cent of the planned development expenditures was to<br />

be spent in the rural areas of Liberia where over 85 per cent of<br />

the population live. However, more than 50 per cent of this<br />

amount, or f 17 million, was allocated for regional roads<br />

linking the main cities. In fact, less than 15 per cent of the<br />

total development budget was to benefit the rural population<br />

directly (excluding expenditures for education which could not<br />

be allocated to beneficiaries due to lack of specification).<br />

Only 3 per cent of total planned expenditures was allocated for<br />

the improvement and increase of the nation's rice production<br />

though national self-sufficiency in rice had officially been<br />

made the nation's number one agricultural priority (71).<br />

Over f 48 million of total expenditures, or nearly 50 per cent,<br />

was allocated for the urban population, constituting less than 15<br />

per cent of the total population. Expenditures in Monrovia alone<br />

- where about 125,000 Liberian lived - represented over 40 per<br />

cent of total expenditures envisaged under the Plan.<br />

Nearly 20 per cent of planned expenditures could not be specified<br />

(column 5 in Table 40). Of this unspecified amount some $ 9<br />

million was to be spent on Education. <strong>The</strong> designers of the Plan<br />

had to abandon an attempt to introduce some planning in this<br />

sector because of the inadequacy and the unreliability of the<br />

available statistical data and the lack of an appropriate<br />

breakdown of the budget of the (then called) Department of<br />

Education. <strong>The</strong>refore it was decided that the f 9 million would be<br />

used to improve the quality of the existing educational system<br />

and its facilities (72). Given the uneven distribution of<br />

educational and health facilities in the Counties and Townships<br />

this "educational policy" meant a favouring of the urban<br />

population, in particular in Monrovia, over the rural<br />

population of the country (see also Chapter 11).<br />

<strong>The</strong> allocation of funds in the Health Sector as presented in<br />

Table 40 clearly illustrates this assumption. Although hospitals<br />

are located in County Capitals and clinics in the rural areas it<br />

was taken into consideration that these hospitals also serve the<br />

rural population. Because of this, and because of the lack of<br />

specification, i?he amount of I 187,00 for the renovations of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!