10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-296-<br />

In Liberia the dearth of data for the years prior to 1964 is<br />

appalling and though an improvement is visible for the ensuing<br />

period it still leaves much to be desired. Climatologic<br />

conditions as well as a lack of trained manpower convinced of<br />

both the need and usefulness of proper filing systems and<br />

archives, and their maintenance, plus a government which does not<br />

seem to have cared much about changing this situation (2) and -<br />

judging from the budgetary appropriations for Archives and the<br />

training of personnel - has made it an impossibility to prepare<br />

for Liberia series of data which cover a period longer than 15<br />

years. Exceptions to this rule are general statistics on<br />

Government revenues and expenditures, on imports and exports and<br />

a few other items of a general nature.<br />

All existing and - in the short term - uncontrollable difficulties<br />

are further aggravated by the frequent and totally haphazard<br />

changes in the Fiscal Year which create reporting periods<br />

that are not comparable and make any attempt at analysis an optimistic<br />

venture. In 1929 the legislature had decreed that beginning<br />

in 1930 the Fiscal Year would coincide with the Calendar<br />

Year. <strong>The</strong> Treasury Department, however, continued to report to<br />

the National Legislature on the basis of the Legislative Year<br />

which started in October. During the 194O's and 195O's the Treasury<br />

Department used Fiscal Years which in some years ran from<br />

September 1 of the previous (calendar) year to August 31. In<br />

other years the Fiscal Year ran from October 1 to September 30.<br />

Occasionally the reporting period year coincided with the calendar<br />

year, e.g. in 1951,<br />

<strong>The</strong>re also existed differences in reporting periods used Dy tne<br />

various Government agencies and Departments, In the 1940 's and<br />

1950's the Bureau of the Budget used Fiscal Years which started<br />

on January 1 and ended on December 31. <strong>The</strong> reporting periods for<br />

the Nine Year Development Plan (1951 - 1960) ran from July 1 to<br />

June 30, When William Tolbert Jr. succeeded President Tubman he<br />

changed the reporting period (which ran from October 1 to<br />

September 30) to the Calender Year. Consequently, when<br />

submitting in 1973 their Annual Reports (over 1972) several<br />

government institutions did not cover the last quarter of 1971.<br />

This phenpmenon was repeated when in 1976 the reporting period<br />

and the Fiscal Year were again revised to cover the period from<br />

July 1 to June 30.<br />

While data with respect to government revenues and expenditures<br />

are hard to obtain, if at all available, the absence of any<br />

consistency in different reports renders them unreliable. This<br />

questionable reliability is further reduced by the incompetence<br />

and carelessness of the civil servants who were responsible for<br />

the compilation of reports, by manipulations for political<br />

reasons, and by chronic corruption at all levels and in all<br />

sectors of the economy and society.<br />

Despite this inaccuracy and unreliability of the available data<br />

a certain trend is distinguishable with respect to composition<br />

and total size of Government revenues and size and direction of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!