10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-282-<br />

Liberian Government or as the result of the reporting of losses<br />

sustained by them. See Annex 18. Most concessionaires which<br />

submitted income statements reported heavy losses which in most<br />

cases were due to (i) an understatement of sales prices and<br />

(ii) heavy deductions from gross sales revenues for capital and<br />

operational expenses. <strong>The</strong> Liberian Government failed to react<br />

adequately - just as in the case of the obligation to process<br />

a fixed portion of the production locally (see above).<br />

Consequently, tens of millions of dollars of potential revenues<br />

were lost. As corporate income tax payments have thus been<br />

negligible, stumpage fees formed the most important source of<br />

government revenues from the logging companies, land rentals<br />

being relatively low.<br />

Since 1973 each concessionaire is required to pay an annual<br />

surface rent of generally 10 i per acre on "all land held by<br />

the concessionaire", Only some concession agreements state<br />

different rates which, however, depend on specific conditions and<br />

apply mainly to wood processing industries. This has not always<br />

been the case. <strong>The</strong> concessions initially granted (i.e. in the<br />

195O's, 196O's and the early 1970's) required the payment of<br />

surface rentals which were the outcome of a bargaining process<br />

rather than the application of a fixed (uniform) tariff. Also<br />

before the introduction of the Model Timber Concession<br />

Agreement in 1973 there was a tree-marking fee of 10 4 per tree<br />

which however was collected in lieu of surface rental and only<br />

in case of any (concession) operation in a "salvage area".<br />

Early 1978 the amount due from 39 companies for surface rentals<br />

was estimated by the Ministry of Finance at % 887,882.57 (54).<br />

Stumpage Fee Policy<br />

Stumpage fee policy and policy application are thus very important<br />

and have determined the Government's intake from the forestry<br />

sector. <strong>The</strong> rates introduced by the 1957 Supplementary<br />

Act remained unchanged until the early 1970's. It was only under<br />

the Tolbert Administration that an important revision of these<br />

stumpage rates (which did not differentiate according to the<br />

tree species and their values) was made - in the latter part of<br />

1972. <strong>The</strong> fees were then set at:<br />

(a) $ 10 per 1000 bd.ft. or $ 2.88 per m3 for class I<br />

(b) $ 7 per 1000 bd.ft. Or % 2.02 per m3 for class II<br />

(c) $ 6 per 1000 bd.ft. or % 1.73 per m3 for class III<br />

(d) $ 5 per 1000 bd.ft. or % 1.44 per m3 for class IV<br />

(e) $ 3 per 1000 bd.ft. or $ 0.86 per m3 for class "Local".<br />

Finally, a great improvement was introduced, effective June 1,<br />

1973, when the stumpage fees were changed from this fixed-rate<br />

system per class to a scale based on the species, its price on<br />

the world market and its end use (55). Since that year, the<br />

stumpage fees rates have been periodically adjusted. As of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!