10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

-258-<br />

railroad or port (138). As may be recalled the port of Buchanan<br />

was initially constructed by LAMCO.<br />

Another factor hampering the development of the Wologisi deposits<br />

was the slump in the steel industry in the mid-1970's. This can<br />

only be considered as a factor postponing the opening of the<br />

Wologisi Mine, As soon as the recovery of the international<br />

economic situation is a fact this will no longer play a role in<br />

the postponement of the investment decisions.<br />

A last obstacle is the position of the U.S. dollar, Liberia's<br />

currency. As from the early 197O's the downward trend of the<br />

U.S. dollar contributed to the postponement of a final decision<br />

to launch with the investments in the Wologisi Project. Certainly<br />

the incentives offered by the Liberian Government will not<br />

have provided any reason to postpone the investments. Among<br />

these incentives one notes:<br />

- a depletion allowance with a maximum of 50? of Gross Income.<br />

- a contractual freedom of exchange control regulations<br />

- freedom from custom duties, excise taxes, etc.<br />

- tax-deductions of all payments to the Government except<br />

corporate income taxes<br />

- a Government controlled Trade Union organization<br />

- the absence of an obligation to supply a portion or the whole<br />

of the production to a Liberian steel company.<br />

<strong>The</strong> growing impatience as well as the continued uncertainty as to<br />

when the ore deposits of the Wologisi Range would, if ever, be<br />

exploited stimulated a number of Liberians in the second half of<br />

the 197O's to propose exploitation by a State-owned company, to<br />

be financed with funds from international development banks.<br />

This opinion was no doubt influenced by the developments in<br />

Mauretania, Africa's second most important iron ore producer.<br />

In November 1974 the Government of Mauretania had nationalized<br />

the largest iron ore mining company in the country, MIFERMA. In<br />

January 1978, however, it was announced that the Mauretanian<br />

State was to develop the enormous iron ore deposits of Guelbs<br />

(total of initial investments: $ 460 million) through the Stateowned<br />

company of S.N.I.M. - Societe Nationale Industrielle et<br />

Miniere - and with the financial support of Western (I.B.R.D.,<br />

E.I.B. ) and Arab capital. <strong>The</strong> external capital, amounting to<br />

$ 360 million, combined with $100 million which would be<br />

provided by the S.N.I.M., would be used to mine a low grade ore<br />

(38? Fe-content) and concentrate this to a saleable product<br />

with an Fe-content of approximately 65? (139). <strong>The</strong> similarity<br />

to the Wologisi Project is obvious, though the latter would<br />

require double this amount of investments, but the opinion was<br />

held in Liberia that the Liberian Government should be able to<br />

attract financial capital from outside, the more so as it had<br />

never nationalized any corporation in the country (140).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!