10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-254-<br />

pricing of the company's output for tax purposes. In vain it had<br />

been emphasized by the Government that pricing for tax purposes<br />

should be more clearly defined. A small success for the<br />

Government was the limitation of a loss carry forward privilege<br />

to a number of years only, viz., 8 years (in the final<br />

agreement), though initially the Government had insisted that<br />

all deductions for tax purposes should be limited to a definite<br />

period. With the exception of the loss carry forward privilege<br />

this was not realized in the final agreement.<br />

LISCO thus was for the entire term of the concession exempted<br />

from customs duties, excise taxes etc.<br />

It was further agreed that the concession would be cancelled if<br />

active exploration had not started within 6 months after the<br />

Effective Date of the Agreement or if no commercial shipment of<br />

iron ore had been made within four years after the expiration<br />

of the 5-year exploration period (127). <strong>The</strong>se conditions indeed<br />

constituted improvements when compared to e.g. the 19 53 and<br />

1960 Mining Concession Agreement concluded with LAMCO. <strong>The</strong>se<br />

agreements did not contain such provisions but in the LISCO<br />

Concession Agreement "active exploitation" was very vaguely<br />

described, whereas e.g. in the Agreement concluded with Lansdell<br />

Christie in 1945 it was already stated that "It shall be<br />

considered thai exploitation work is carried on in an<br />

exploitation lot when at least five workmen work therein daily<br />

and some mechanical apparatus is in active use" (128).<br />

Even the 1958 Concession Agreement with NIOC still described<br />

"active exploitation" more precisely than the LISCO Agreement<br />

by providing that "It shall be considered that exploitation work<br />

is carried on in an Exploitation Lot when an average of at least<br />

five workmen work there in an average of four months a year and<br />

some mechanical apparatus is in active use thereon or on access<br />

roads or means of transportation to such lots" (129).<br />

See Annex 14 for further details of the LISCO Concession<br />

Agreement.<br />

Rumenian interest in developing the concession<br />

Little is known of the ups and downs of LISCO after September<br />

1967. <strong>The</strong> Rumenians apparently showed an interest in the Project<br />

in 1968 when a Trade Delegation from Rumenia visited Liberia and<br />

visited the Wologisi Range upon invitation of LISCO. <strong>The</strong>ir<br />

interest did not result in participation, probably because of<br />

difficulties in obtaining hard currency although President<br />

Tubman's aversion to relations with Communist countries may also<br />

have had an influence. When in 1971 William Tolbert succeeded<br />

Tubman he changed, among other things, Liberia's official foreign<br />

policy towards the countries of Eastern Europe although attempts<br />

in the early 197O's to interest the Rumanians again in the<br />

Wologisi ore failed (130).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!