10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-242-<br />

loaned Bong for its expansion programme, $ 25 million, was also<br />

exempted from withholding taxes. A two years' exemption was<br />

granted on December 26, 1975 by the then Minister of Finance and<br />

Steve Tolbert's successor at the Ministry of Finance, Edwin<br />

Williams. In 1977 Finsider claimed continued exemption from<br />

withholding taxes on the interest payments on this | 25 million<br />

loan, basing its claim on the exemption granted the Kreditanstalt<br />

fur Wiederaufbau (94). Though the Italian company's position was<br />

far from strong in this respect the dispute was not yet solved<br />

on December 31, 1977 when the two-year exemption period expired.<br />

As a result of B.M.C's borrowing practices the company's debtequity<br />

ratio was 4-9 : 1 as of December 31, 1976. <strong>The</strong> original<br />

Concession Agreement did not include a maximum debt-equity ratio.<br />

However, the revised Concession Agreement of 1974 stated that<br />

interest and financing charges on loans contracted between<br />

August 1973 and December 31, 1980 could only be charged against<br />

Profits if the debt-equity ratio did not exceed 3 : 1• <strong>The</strong><br />

provision, however, had been waived in the case of interest and<br />

financing charges on<br />

"any long-term indebtedness incurred in connection with<br />

special circumstances on any major expansions, or investments<br />

related to an improvement of the productivity, provided<br />

the Concessionaire.shall first have obtained the<br />

approval of the Government" (95).<br />

It is not certain that the Government has officially given its<br />

approval in this respect though the Government's representatives<br />

on B.M.C.'s Board of Directors (one of the results of the 1974<br />

Revision) appear to have given their approval to these<br />

borrowings. However, the explicit mentioning of the long-term<br />

character of these loans in the case of a waiver may entitle<br />

the Government to restrict a waiver precisely to those loans<br />

which deserve such a qualification and are neither medium-term<br />

nor short-term borrowings.<br />

<strong>The</strong> 1976 debt-equity ration of nearly 5 : 1 constituted an increased<br />

dependency on borrowed funds when compared to the 1965<br />

situation. After the completion of the initial investments in<br />

1965 (which had been financed with loans of over $ 66 million)<br />

the debt-equity ration had been 4 '• 1 • In the second half of the<br />

1960's stockholders' loans had represented approximately 25? of<br />

all borrowed funds at a cost to the Liberian Treasury of some<br />

$ 1.8 million in the 1965-1969 period only (96). This excessive<br />

use of'"disguised equity capital" had led to an agreement between<br />

the Government and the private shareholders in 1972 (when the<br />

debt-equity ratio had risen to 6.17 : 1) according to which part<br />

of these stockholders' loans, amounting to | 4 million, would be<br />

treated as non-interest bearing loans for a period of eight<br />

years commencing January 1, 1973. In connection with the<br />

expansion programme of the 1970's it was later agreed that a<br />

further $ 10 million of shareholders' loans would be treated as<br />

non-interest bearing as from July 1, 1977 (97).<br />

Bong's debt-equity ratio had also been involved in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!