10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-221-<br />

Prior to 1974 fifty per cent of all LAMCO-ore sold on a c.i.f.<br />

basis was shipped in Granges-owned ships, the remaining fifty per<br />

cent in ships owned by the Providence Shipping Company or ships<br />

designated by the Liberian Government, As a result of the 1974<br />

amendment of the Shipping Arrangement the Providence Shipping<br />

Company acquired 100? of these shipping rights but given the fact<br />

that the fleet of this shipping company, a joint venture between<br />

the Liberian Government and Granges, consisted of only one<br />

vessel at the end of 1977, the practical outcome of this<br />

arrangement differed little from the previous situation.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Financial Advisor (43)<br />

By contract, the Stockholmsk Enskilda Bank (later Skandinaviska<br />

Enskilda Banken, after the merger of the Stockholmsk Enskilda<br />

Bank with other Swedish banks in the 1970's) was to act as<br />

LAMCO's Financial Advisor for an indefinite period, an<br />

arrangement which is subject to cancellation at 90 days notice.<br />

S.E.B.'s activities with respect to the realization of the mining<br />

venture were discussed before and for a number of years the<br />

Bank's prime function remained that of being LAMCO's contact with<br />

its lenders and - in later years - that of contacting potential<br />

future lenders. Besides managing the financial affairs of LAMCO<br />

the Bank rendered financial advice if actions were considered by<br />

the Company's Board of Directors. In the past the Bank's personnel<br />

were not paid by LAMCO; the only direct charges to LAMCO by the<br />

S.E.B. were for travel, telegram and overseas telephone expenses.<br />

<strong>The</strong> bank usually bore the costs of advising services, which in<br />

1968 were estimated by the Bank at some $ 100.000.00.<br />

Besides the $ 750,000.00 which the S.E.B. received under the<br />

1960 arrangement the S.E.B. received a fee of $ 150,000.00 per<br />

year starting from I965 and until 1975> Since that year LAMCO<br />

has paid the S.E.B. $ 200,000.00; the decision in June 1975 to<br />

raise the fee by 25? was taken in order to compensate for the<br />

cost increases which had occurred since 1961 and the devaluation<br />

and depreciation of the dollar after 1971. Thus a total of<br />

$ 2,850,000.00 was paid by LAMCO for these services to the<br />

S.E.B. In spite of these services LAMCO experienced severe<br />

liquidity problems (caused primarily by the Company's borrowing<br />

practices). In 1976 the Government therefore expressed the<br />

desire to terminate the contract with the Financial Advisor.<br />

<strong>The</strong> Debt-Equity Ratio<br />

Perhaps the best-known feature of the LAMCO-Investment is its<br />

extreme reliance on non-equity capital, which sometimes took the<br />

form of disguised equity capital. Less generally known, however,<br />

are the full details and costs of these borrowing practices.<br />

Neither is it generally known that the Company continued to<br />

finance the operations of the mining enterprise with loans,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!