10.01.2013 Views

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

The_Open_Door_deel1

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

-172-<br />

doubtlessly influenced by a financial crisis which made a more<br />

efficient natural resources administration even more urgent the<br />

Government undertook another revision of its arrangements with<br />

L.M.C in the early 196O's. According to the phrasing of the<br />

1965 Amendatory and Tax Agreement between L.M.C, and the<br />

Government the former was forced to accept an income tax<br />

liability of 50? as of January 1, 1965 instead of January 1,<br />

1970 as had been agreed upon in the 1952 collateral agreement<br />

(32). However, in order to have this accepted the Government<br />

relinquished its rights to any other payment from L.M.C. and<br />

promised that it would never again ask for an amendment of the<br />

concession agreement or the collateral agreement (33).<br />

Consequently, royalty payments ceased as of the effective date<br />

of the Tax Agreement, January 1, 1965, and from then on L.M.C.<br />

only paid income taxes, and the usual exploration and surface<br />

taxes. In the ten-year period preceeding the 1965 Agreement<br />

L.M.C.'s taxable profits had amounted to approximately<br />

$ 127,000,000.00 of which the Government had received about<br />

$ 40,000,000.00 as royalty and income tax payments. However,<br />

after the 1965 agreement the company never again achieved the<br />

same high level of profits (see Table 7). One might conclude from<br />

Table 7 that the introduction of a 50? corporate income tax on<br />

L.M.C.'s net profits in 1965 had been long overdue and had come<br />

a little late. When a comparison is made between the low level<br />

of profits in the late 196O's and the 1970's and those of the<br />

1955 - 1965 period when annual profits averaged over<br />

$ 12,000,000.00 with a record profit of nearly $ 17,000,000.00<br />

in 1960. On the whole the nature of the operations accounted for<br />

the tapering off of the profits, though the accounting practices<br />

of L.M.C. were also responsible for this phenomenon. <strong>The</strong> unequal<br />

sharing in the company's profits during the 1971 - 1977 period<br />

(the Tolbert Administration) was the result of a tougher stand of<br />

the Liberians on various issues affecting the amount of net<br />

profits which resulted e.g. in the payment of a lump sum by<br />

L.M.C. of over $ 2,000,000.00 in 1972 through the Settlement<br />

Agreement of the same year (see below).<br />

<strong>The</strong> overall -profit-income of the Liberia Mining Company after<br />

paying the Liberian Government what it- was legally entitled to<br />

under the agreements of 1945, 1952 and 1965 can fairly accurately<br />

be estimated to have been about $ 168,000,000.00 during the years<br />

1951 - 1977. This aggregate amount includes adjustments made for<br />

reserves for replacement, expansion, development and other<br />

contingencies, a depletion allowance and other - legal -<br />

financial advantages (34)• As indicated, the Government's share<br />

in the proceeds of the mining and sales of the ore were royalty<br />

and corporate income tax payments totalling $ 84,000,000.00. In<br />

short, two out of every three dollars (net) profits made out of<br />

the Bomi Hills iron ore by L.M.C. left the country.<br />

This of course raises the question of what should be a fair<br />

remuneration for the use of foreign capital and know-how.<br />

Whereas the remuneration of foreign (managerial and<br />

technological) know-how takes place through the payment of

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!