10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>the</strong> upshot: what is <strong>to</strong> be done? S 207<br />

Second, <strong>the</strong> president must launch a public process <strong>to</strong> consider<br />

long-term changes in our systems <strong>of</strong> governance, politics, and law.<br />

The goal is <strong>to</strong> create practical recommendations that enable us <strong>to</strong><br />

anticipate and surmount <strong>the</strong> challenges ahead and ensure, as much<br />

as is humanly possible, that we never again stumble <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> brink <strong>of</strong><br />

global disaster. To that end I propose <strong>the</strong> appointment <strong>of</strong> a broadly<br />

based presidential commission <strong>to</strong> consider changes in governance<br />

and politics, including <strong>the</strong> necessity <strong>of</strong> a second constitutional<br />

convention. Nei<strong>the</strong>r idea is new. Presidential commissions have<br />

long been used as a way <strong>to</strong> engage thoughtful and distinguished<br />

persons in <strong>the</strong> task <strong>of</strong> rethinking various aspects <strong>of</strong> public policy<br />

and governance. The Ash Council, for one, laid <strong>the</strong> groundwork<br />

for what eventually became <strong>the</strong> U.S. Environmental Protection<br />

Agency. And <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> a new constitutional convention has<br />

been proposed by legal scholars as diverse as Sanford Levinson and<br />

Larry Saba<strong>to</strong>, among many o<strong>the</strong>rs (Levinson, 2006, p. 173; Saba<strong>to</strong>,<br />

2007, pp. 198–220). In Saba<strong>to</strong>’s words, <strong>the</strong> founders:<br />

had risked life, limb, fortune, and birthright <strong>to</strong> revolt against <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

mo<strong>the</strong>r country, determined <strong>to</strong> stand on principle . . . But <strong>the</strong>y<br />

might also have been surprised and disappointed that future generations<br />

<strong>of</strong> Americans would be unable <strong>to</strong> duplicate <strong>the</strong>ir daring<br />

and match <strong>the</strong>ir creativity when presented with new challenges.<br />

(pp. 199–200)<br />

Facing challenges that dwarf any that <strong>the</strong> founders could<br />

have imagined, we should be at least as bold and farsighted as<br />

<strong>the</strong>y were. Whe<strong>the</strong>r a presidential commission would propose <strong>to</strong><br />

reform governance by legislation, amendments <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Constitution,<br />

a full-scale constitutional convention, or some combination<br />

<strong>of</strong> measures, <strong>the</strong>ir charge would be <strong>to</strong> reform our system<br />

<strong>of</strong> governance <strong>to</strong> improve democracy and promote deliberation<br />

in ways that soon produce wise and well-crafted public policies<br />

that accord with ecological realities. Beyond proposals by<br />

experts like Levinson, Saba<strong>to</strong>, and Robert Dahl that aim <strong>to</strong> make

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!