10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

186 S far<strong>the</strong>r horizons<br />

• <strong>the</strong> focus should be on problems solvable at a pr<strong>of</strong>i t by technology<br />

and policy changes;<br />

• signifi cant improvement <strong>of</strong> politics, policy, and governance<br />

are unlikely and probably irrelevant, because<br />

• better design and market adjustments can substitute for<br />

governmental regulation and <strong>the</strong>reby eliminate most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

sources <strong>of</strong> political controversy.<br />

Masquerading as optimism, this approach is, in fact, pessimistic<br />

about our capacity <strong>to</strong> understand <strong>the</strong> truth and act nobly. So nei<strong>the</strong>r<br />

we nor those who presumably lead us talk about limits <strong>to</strong><br />

growth, unsolvable problems, moral failings, <strong>the</strong> unequal distribution<br />

<strong>of</strong> wealth within and between generations, emerging dangers,<br />

impossibilities, technology gone awry, or necessary sacrifi ces.<br />

“Realism” so diluted requires us <strong>to</strong> portray <strong>climate</strong> change as an<br />

opportunity <strong>to</strong> make a great deal <strong>of</strong> money, which it may be for<br />

some, but without saying that it might not be for most, not <strong>to</strong><br />

mention its connections <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r issues, problems, and dilemmas<br />

or <strong>the</strong> possibility that <strong>the</strong> four horsemen are gaining on us. No<br />

American politician is supposed <strong>to</strong> talk about coming changes in<br />

our “lifestyles,” a telling and empty word implying fashion, not<br />

necessity or conviction.<br />

Ultimately, this approach is condescending <strong>to</strong> those who are<br />

presumed incapable <strong>of</strong> facing <strong>the</strong> truth and acting creatively and<br />

courageously in dire circumstances. The idea that we may have <strong>to</strong><br />

give up something in order <strong>to</strong> stabilize <strong>climate</strong> is not <strong>to</strong> be spoken<br />

by any national political leader for fear <strong>of</strong> losing public support. So<br />

<strong>the</strong>y reduce <strong>the</strong> problem <strong>to</strong> a series <strong>of</strong> wedges representing various<br />

possibilities that would potentially eliminate so many giga<strong>to</strong>ns<br />

<strong>of</strong> carbon without any serious changes in how we live. But <strong>the</strong>re<br />

is no proposed wedge called “suck it up,” because that is believed<br />

<strong>to</strong> be <strong>to</strong>o much <strong>to</strong> ask <strong>of</strong> people who have been consuming way<br />

<strong>to</strong>o much, <strong>to</strong>o carelessly, for <strong>to</strong>o long. The “American way <strong>of</strong> life”<br />

is thought <strong>to</strong> be sacrosanct. In <strong>the</strong> face <strong>of</strong> a global emergency,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!