10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

millennial hope S 175<br />

networks, are highly vulnerable, not just <strong>to</strong> terrorism but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

cascading effects <strong>of</strong> breakdowns, accidents, and acts <strong>of</strong> God. Economist<br />

Barry Lynn similarly argues that <strong>the</strong> same vulnerabilities<br />

characterize <strong>the</strong> global economy that is “ever more interactively<br />

complex and tightly coupled” while becoming less redundant and<br />

less well managed (2005, p. 234). The issue has a long pedigree.<br />

In 1978, geochemist Harrison Brown proposed a national strategy<br />

<strong>of</strong> resilience that would build “redundancies in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> system<br />

by endowing <strong>the</strong> system with more effective means for repairing<br />

itself by establishing buffering mechanisms such as improved<br />

s<strong>to</strong>rage facilities for food and raw materials.” His vision included<br />

cities that would be self-reliant for food, energy, and materials, in<br />

<strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> peasant villages (1978, p. 218, pp. 242–244). Amory<br />

and Hunter Lovins’ book Brittle Power is a blueprint for a resilient<br />

energy system, based on nine principles <strong>of</strong> resilient design that<br />

are more broadly applicable as well (1982, pp. 177–213). Yale sociologist<br />

Charles Perrow, in his classic 1984 book Normal Accidents<br />

and more recently in The Next Catastrophe, proposes <strong>to</strong> increase<br />

societal resilience by downscaling and decentralizing organizations<br />

<strong>of</strong> all kinds, as well as <strong>the</strong> electric grid and industrial supply<br />

chains (2007, p. 296). But in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any coherent national<br />

effort <strong>to</strong> advance resilience, many citizens are taking matters in<strong>to</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir own hands by building local self-reliance for food, energy,<br />

and economic support. The movement <strong>to</strong> build agriculture systems<br />

organized on <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> natural systems, <strong>the</strong> growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> community-supported farms, <strong>the</strong> burgeoning Slow Food<br />

movement, school gardens, and urban gardens are all promising<br />

movements <strong>to</strong>ward resilience (Pollan, 2008). In energy systems,<br />

<strong>the</strong> rapid deployment <strong>of</strong> wind and solar, even with little government<br />

support, similarly refl ects <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> changes that promote<br />

societal resilience and locally based prosperity. But <strong>the</strong>se still isolated<br />

and intermittent efforts must be integrated in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> broader<br />

national effort now under way <strong>to</strong> improve <strong>the</strong> resilience, redundancy,<br />

and robustness <strong>of</strong> basic infrastructure and systems.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!