Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
millennial hope S 175<br />
networks, are highly vulnerable, not just <strong>to</strong> terrorism but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
cascading effects <strong>of</strong> breakdowns, accidents, and acts <strong>of</strong> God. Economist<br />
Barry Lynn similarly argues that <strong>the</strong> same vulnerabilities<br />
characterize <strong>the</strong> global economy that is “ever more interactively<br />
complex and tightly coupled” while becoming less redundant and<br />
less well managed (2005, p. 234). The issue has a long pedigree.<br />
In 1978, geochemist Harrison Brown proposed a national strategy<br />
<strong>of</strong> resilience that would build “redundancies in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> system<br />
by endowing <strong>the</strong> system with more effective means for repairing<br />
itself by establishing buffering mechanisms such as improved<br />
s<strong>to</strong>rage facilities for food and raw materials.” His vision included<br />
cities that would be self-reliant for food, energy, and materials, in<br />
<strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> peasant villages (1978, p. 218, pp. 242–244). Amory<br />
and Hunter Lovins’ book Brittle Power is a blueprint for a resilient<br />
energy system, based on nine principles <strong>of</strong> resilient design that<br />
are more broadly applicable as well (1982, pp. 177–213). Yale sociologist<br />
Charles Perrow, in his classic 1984 book Normal Accidents<br />
and more recently in The Next Catastrophe, proposes <strong>to</strong> increase<br />
societal resilience by downscaling and decentralizing organizations<br />
<strong>of</strong> all kinds, as well as <strong>the</strong> electric grid and industrial supply<br />
chains (2007, p. 296). But in <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> any coherent national<br />
effort <strong>to</strong> advance resilience, many citizens are taking matters in<strong>to</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir own hands by building local self-reliance for food, energy,<br />
and economic support. The movement <strong>to</strong> build agriculture systems<br />
organized on <strong>the</strong> principles <strong>of</strong> natural systems, <strong>the</strong> growth<br />
<strong>of</strong> community-supported farms, <strong>the</strong> burgeoning Slow Food<br />
movement, school gardens, and urban gardens are all promising<br />
movements <strong>to</strong>ward resilience (Pollan, 2008). In energy systems,<br />
<strong>the</strong> rapid deployment <strong>of</strong> wind and solar, even with little government<br />
support, similarly refl ects <strong>the</strong> kinds <strong>of</strong> changes that promote<br />
societal resilience and locally based prosperity. But <strong>the</strong>se still isolated<br />
and intermittent efforts must be integrated in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> broader<br />
national effort now under way <strong>to</strong> improve <strong>the</strong> resilience, redundancy,<br />
and robustness <strong>of</strong> basic infrastructure and systems.