10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

S<br />

162 far<strong>the</strong>r horizons<br />

killing fi elds <strong>of</strong> Cambodia, Rwanda, and Darfur. After a lifetime<br />

<strong>of</strong> observing human nature, Carl Jung concluded that “There is<br />

a terrible demon in man that blindfolds him, that prepares awful<br />

destruction” ( quoted in Jarrett, 1988, p. 1277). His<strong>to</strong>rian and sociologist<br />

Barring<strong>to</strong>n Moore in his classic study Refl ections on <strong>the</strong><br />

Causes <strong>of</strong> Human Misery concluded similarly that “mankind can<br />

expect <strong>to</strong> oscillate between <strong>the</strong> cruelties <strong>of</strong> law and order and<br />

<strong>the</strong> cruelties <strong>of</strong> changing it for as long as it leaves <strong>the</strong> globe fi t<br />

for human habitation” (Moore, 1972, p. 39). In Humanity: A Moral<br />

His<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Twentieth Century, Jonathan Glover doubts that we<br />

became worse than previous societies, but says: “Technology has<br />

made a difference. The decisions <strong>of</strong> a few people can mean horror<br />

and death for hundreds <strong>of</strong> thousands, even millions, <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

people” (p. 3). Looking beyond <strong>the</strong> carnage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> past century, he<br />

proposes <strong>to</strong> defend <strong>the</strong> Enlightenment hope <strong>of</strong> a more humane<br />

world, but concludes that “<strong>the</strong>re are more things, darker things, <strong>to</strong><br />

understand about ourselves than those who share this hope have<br />

generally allowed” (p. 7). He concludes by saying: “It is <strong>to</strong>o late <strong>to</strong><br />

s<strong>to</strong>p <strong>the</strong> technology. It is <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> psychology that we should now<br />

turn” (p. 414). Philosopher Tzvetan Todorov similarly believes that<br />

<strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> evil has not changed, but its scale has grown, driven<br />

by both fragmentation and depersonalization (Todorov, 1996,<br />

pp. 289–290).<br />

Now that we are facing our largest challenge, what do we<br />

know <strong>of</strong> our own liabilities and potentials? It is easier <strong>to</strong> ignore<br />

that kind <strong>of</strong> introspection, <strong>to</strong> focus on technology or policy or<br />

anything else instead <strong>of</strong> looking inward <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> complexities and<br />

ironies <strong>of</strong> our own psychology. But I think Glover is right that<br />

<strong>the</strong> job <strong>of</strong> building a decent world will come down <strong>to</strong> how well<br />

we understand ourselves and how much we can improve <strong>the</strong><br />

“still unlovely human mind” (Leopold, 1949). The failure <strong>to</strong> do so<br />

explains in large measure why many underestimate <strong>the</strong> scope and<br />

scale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human destruction <strong>of</strong> nature and trivialize its causes.<br />

As if caught in a bad dream, we seem powerless <strong>to</strong> s<strong>to</strong>p it. The

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!