10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

128 S connections<br />

exerted great infl uence on U.S. politics and are said still <strong>to</strong> intend<br />

a fundamentalist takeover <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> U.S. government “whatever <strong>the</strong><br />

cost” (Moser, 2005). The result, in Bill McKibben’s words, is that<br />

“America is simultaneously <strong>the</strong> most pr<strong>of</strong>essedly Christian <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

developed nations and <strong>the</strong> least Christian in its behavior” (2005).<br />

It is imperative, <strong>the</strong>refore, that we understand what extreme fundamentalists<br />

intend and what that portends for our democracy<br />

and our collective prospects.<br />

Evangelicals and fundamentalists, however, are not all <strong>of</strong> one<br />

accord. 2 Fundamentalism, as his<strong>to</strong>rian <strong>of</strong> religion George Marsden<br />

points out is a “mosaic <strong>of</strong> divergent and sometimes contradic<strong>to</strong>ry<br />

traditions and tendencies” (2006, p. 43). The difference between<br />

evangelicals and fundamentalists, according <strong>to</strong> Marsden, is “<strong>the</strong>ir<br />

relative degrees <strong>of</strong> militancy in support <strong>of</strong> conservative doctrinal,<br />

ecclesiastical, and/or cultural issues” (p. 235). Many evangelicals,<br />

including Richard Cizik, <strong>the</strong> former vice president for government<br />

affairs at <strong>the</strong> National Association <strong>of</strong> Evangelicals, and Jim<br />

Ball <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Evangelical Environmental Network, are constructively<br />

engaged in “creation care,” building alliances between churches<br />

and <strong>the</strong> environmental community <strong>to</strong> good effect. The problem,<br />

in <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> evangelical <strong>the</strong>ologian Ronald Sider, is that:<br />

Tragically, Christian political activity <strong>to</strong>day is a disaster. Christians<br />

embrace contradic<strong>to</strong>ry positions on almost every political issue.<br />

When <strong>the</strong>y join <strong>the</strong> political fray, <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten succumb <strong>to</strong> dishonesty<br />

and corruption . . . At <strong>the</strong> heart <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> problem is <strong>the</strong> fact<br />

that many Christians, especially evangelical Christians, have not<br />

thought very carefully about how <strong>to</strong> do politics in a wise, biblically<br />

grounded way . . . [The result is] contradiction, confusion,<br />

ineffectiveness, even biblical unfaithfulness, in our political work.<br />

(2008, pp. 11, 19)<br />

My concern, accordingly, is with <strong>the</strong> more-fundamental-than-thou<br />

brand <strong>of</strong> fundamentalism, and specifi cally with those at <strong>the</strong> extreme<br />

who pr<strong>of</strong>ess belief in <strong>the</strong> imminence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end times as allegedly

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!