10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

leadership in <strong>the</strong> long emergency S 103<br />

and forestall. Second, in order <strong>to</strong> consistently implement <strong>climate</strong><br />

policy across all branches <strong>of</strong> government, this and all future<br />

presidents will need <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>to</strong> coordinate actions <strong>of</strong> federal<br />

departments and agencies that now <strong>of</strong>ten confl ict. The president<br />

and Congress will need an expanded federal capacity <strong>to</strong> assess<br />

technologies similar <strong>to</strong> that once provided by <strong>the</strong> Congressional<br />

Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Technology Assessment, which was terminated in Newt<br />

Gingrich’s “Contract with America” in 1994. In addition, we will<br />

need <strong>to</strong> expand <strong>the</strong> foresight capacity <strong>of</strong> government in novel<br />

and creative ways that more fully engage <strong>the</strong> National Academy<br />

<strong>of</strong> Sciences; <strong>the</strong> broader scientifi c community represented by <strong>the</strong><br />

American Association for <strong>the</strong> Advancement <strong>of</strong> Science; federal<br />

labora<strong>to</strong>ries, such as <strong>the</strong> National Renewable Energy Labora<strong>to</strong>ry;<br />

and <strong>the</strong> president’s science advisor. We need new ideas as<br />

well. British journalist George Monbiot, for example, proposes a<br />

“100-year committee” whose purpose would be “<strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong><br />

likely impacts <strong>of</strong> current policy in 10, 20, 50, and 100 years’ time.”<br />

Governments, by whatever means, must learn <strong>to</strong> reconcile shortterm<br />

imperatives with long-term trends in imaginative and effective<br />

ways. But that requires that those presuming <strong>to</strong> govern have<br />

<strong>the</strong> capacity and willingness <strong>to</strong> see connections across political<br />

lines, geography, species, and time.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> decades ahead, presidents will also need a greater capacity<br />

<strong>to</strong> respond quickly and effectively <strong>to</strong> <strong>climate</strong>-driven disasters.<br />

The failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> devastation caused by<br />

Hurricane Katrina, again, is a textbook example <strong>of</strong> what not <strong>to</strong><br />

do. We must anticipate and prepare for a future in which hurricanes,<br />

large s<strong>to</strong>rms, fl ood, fi re, drought, and acts <strong>of</strong> terrorism may<br />

become <strong>the</strong> norm. For that reason <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> federal government<br />

<strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> emergencies must be much more robust<br />

and effective, not just for occasional events but for multiple and<br />

perhaps frequent events.<br />

But no such changes are likely until <strong>the</strong> great encampment<br />

<strong>of</strong> K Street lobbyists is disbanded and sent packing. They have

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!