Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
leadership in <strong>the</strong> long emergency S 103<br />
and forestall. Second, in order <strong>to</strong> consistently implement <strong>climate</strong><br />
policy across all branches <strong>of</strong> government, this and all future<br />
presidents will need <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>to</strong> coordinate actions <strong>of</strong> federal<br />
departments and agencies that now <strong>of</strong>ten confl ict. The president<br />
and Congress will need an expanded federal capacity <strong>to</strong> assess<br />
technologies similar <strong>to</strong> that once provided by <strong>the</strong> Congressional<br />
Offi ce <strong>of</strong> Technology Assessment, which was terminated in Newt<br />
Gingrich’s “Contract with America” in 1994. In addition, we will<br />
need <strong>to</strong> expand <strong>the</strong> foresight capacity <strong>of</strong> government in novel<br />
and creative ways that more fully engage <strong>the</strong> National Academy<br />
<strong>of</strong> Sciences; <strong>the</strong> broader scientifi c community represented by <strong>the</strong><br />
American Association for <strong>the</strong> Advancement <strong>of</strong> Science; federal<br />
labora<strong>to</strong>ries, such as <strong>the</strong> National Renewable Energy Labora<strong>to</strong>ry;<br />
and <strong>the</strong> president’s science advisor. We need new ideas as<br />
well. British journalist George Monbiot, for example, proposes a<br />
“100-year committee” whose purpose would be “<strong>to</strong> assess <strong>the</strong><br />
likely impacts <strong>of</strong> current policy in 10, 20, 50, and 100 years’ time.”<br />
Governments, by whatever means, must learn <strong>to</strong> reconcile shortterm<br />
imperatives with long-term trends in imaginative and effective<br />
ways. But that requires that those presuming <strong>to</strong> govern have<br />
<strong>the</strong> capacity and willingness <strong>to</strong> see connections across political<br />
lines, geography, species, and time.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> decades ahead, presidents will also need a greater capacity<br />
<strong>to</strong> respond quickly and effectively <strong>to</strong> <strong>climate</strong>-driven disasters.<br />
The failure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> federal response <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> devastation caused by<br />
Hurricane Katrina, again, is a textbook example <strong>of</strong> what not <strong>to</strong><br />
do. We must anticipate and prepare for a future in which hurricanes,<br />
large s<strong>to</strong>rms, fl ood, fi re, drought, and acts <strong>of</strong> terrorism may<br />
become <strong>the</strong> norm. For that reason <strong>the</strong> capacity <strong>of</strong> federal government<br />
<strong>to</strong> respond <strong>to</strong> emergencies must be much more robust<br />
and effective, not just for occasional events but for multiple and<br />
perhaps frequent events.<br />
But no such changes are likely until <strong>the</strong> great encampment<br />
<strong>of</strong> K Street lobbyists is disbanded and sent packing. They have