10.01.2013 Views

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

Down to the wire : confronting climate collapse / David - Index of

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

late-night thoughts about democracy S 77<br />

Box 2.2. Postscript: A Note on <strong>the</strong> Shelf Life <strong>of</strong><br />

Economic Ideas<br />

Those <strong>of</strong> us who have looked <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> self-interest <strong>of</strong> lending institutions<br />

<strong>to</strong> protect shareholder’s equity, myself included, are in a state <strong>of</strong> shocked<br />

disbelief . . . Yes, I have found a fl aw. I don’t know how signifi cant or<br />

permanent it is. But I’ve been very distressed by that fact.<br />

—Alan Greenspan<br />

The self-confi dence <strong>of</strong> learned people is <strong>the</strong> comic tragedy <strong>of</strong> civilization.<br />

—Alfred North Whitehead<br />

Conservative philosopher Richard Weaver once noted that “ideas<br />

have consequences” (1984). And some really bad ideas <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

last half century are leaving a legacy <strong>of</strong> very bad consequences.<br />

Weaver’s 1948 book was an extended argument for conservatism,<br />

beginning with <strong>the</strong> recognition <strong>of</strong> knowledge higher than our<br />

own and <strong>the</strong> importance <strong>of</strong> such things as virtue, character, craftsmanship,<br />

enduring quality, civility, and, above all, piety. Applied<br />

<strong>to</strong> nature, Weaver argued for a “degree <strong>of</strong> humility” such that we<br />

might avoid meddling “with small parts <strong>of</strong> a machine <strong>of</strong> whose<br />

<strong>to</strong>tal design and purpose we are ignorant” (p. 173). “Our planet,”<br />

he wrote, is falling victim <strong>to</strong> a rigorism, so that what is done in<br />

any remote corner affects—nay, menaces—<strong>the</strong> whole. Resiliency<br />

and <strong>to</strong>lerance are lost” (p. 173). Weaver regarded <strong>the</strong> modern project<br />

<strong>to</strong> reconstruct nature as an “adolescent infatuation.” One can<br />

reasonably imagine <strong>the</strong> approbation he would have felt for <strong>the</strong><br />

creative exhibition <strong>of</strong> thievery and stupidity that has led <strong>to</strong> our<br />

present circumstances.<br />

Weaver’s idea that ideas have real consequences, alas, had less<br />

consequence than one might wish. It is honored mostly among a<br />

small band <strong>of</strong> true conservatives, <strong>the</strong> uncommon sort who actually<br />

value <strong>the</strong> conservation <strong>of</strong> tradition, law, cus<strong>to</strong>m, nature, culture,<br />

and religion, and who take ideas and <strong>the</strong>ir real-world implications<br />

seriously. O<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> title <strong>of</strong> his book, however, Weaver<br />

is presently unknown <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> wider public, and probably not at<br />

all <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> faux conservatives who daily bloviate on FOX News.<br />

Unfortunately, ideas, whatever <strong>the</strong>ir consequences, seldom “yield<br />

(continued)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!