09.01.2013 Views

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

A System of Heraldry - Clan Strachan Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OF THE SURCOAT, ENSIGN, AND SHIELD. i r<br />

As the shield \vas a necessary instrument in defence <strong>of</strong> the body, so was it with<br />

the ancients an honourable badge or -ign ; for, with the Grecians and Romaic, they<br />

who returned from the battle without 'it, were in great disgrace, and interdicted<br />

from holy things, as the antiquaries <strong>of</strong> those nations write. And as the shield v.a<br />

necessary and honourable, so it was judged by<br />

all nations the most coin en:<br />

tabula, to contain marks <strong>of</strong> valour and honour, as Bccmannus very well oi,<br />

Dissert. VI. Chap. V11I. " Scutum cur veteres potissimum eligerent, ratio iuit<br />

" quod inter anna maxime conspicuum esset, ac dclensivis puritcr atque oilen .<br />

" armis omnibus nobilius haberetur."<br />

Antiquaries, historians, and heralds, amuse us with many various forms <strong>of</strong> shields<br />

used by the ancients, which are but <strong>of</strong> little use to us, therefore I shall be verybrief<br />

with them. There is no kingdom, people, or country, but have had several<br />

forms and fashions <strong>of</strong> shields, as they have had <strong>of</strong> apparel, ot which I shall give<br />

here only some few forms, ancient and modern, that ha\e been generally known<br />

and received all Europe over.<br />

. Shields<br />

for the most part <strong>of</strong> old were to be seen triangular on the ancientest<br />

monuments, seals and coins; by the French called VAncien Ecu, as in Plate I.<br />

fig. i. that is the ancient shield : Arid from this triangular form, came the custom<br />

in heraldry, <strong>of</strong> placing the greatest number <strong>of</strong> figures above, and the smallest below,<br />

as 2 and i ; and if more figures, such as stars, 4, 3, 2, and i. This form <strong>of</strong><br />

shield is to be seen on our ancientest monuments with figures so situated.<br />

The other form <strong>of</strong> a shield, Plate I. fig. 2. now universally used, is square,<br />

rounded and pointed at the bottom, as Monsieur Baron describes it, in his Art <strong>of</strong><br />

Blazon<br />

"<br />

; Quarre arrondi &- pointu par la bas ;" which they say is after the<br />

fashion <strong>of</strong> the Samnitic shield used by the Romans. Sylvester Petra Sancta, in<br />

his Treatise <strong>of</strong> <strong>Heraldry</strong>, cap. n. "<br />

says, Existimo enim ad scuti Samnitici ftirmam<br />

"<br />

interne cuneatam & pinnatam, aequalem autem superne exigi posse materiatam<br />

"<br />

scuti hujus honorarii figurationem." Shields after this form, are commonly<br />

made use <strong>of</strong> by the Britons, French, and Germans.<br />

The Spaniards and Portuguese, have the like form <strong>of</strong> shields but ; they are<br />

round at the bottom, without a point, Plate I.<br />

fig. 3. The Germuns, besides the<br />

former, have other forms <strong>of</strong> shields whereon they place their arms ; two <strong>of</strong> which<br />

I shall here add. The first has its sides sloping, and again bulging at the flanks,<br />

as fig. 4. and the other, as fig. 5. has nicks and notches, called a shield-chancre ;<br />

because a shield after this form was used <strong>of</strong> old by them as a convenient one for<br />

resting the lance upon the notch, and in giving a thrust ; yet its form is not so<br />

convenient as the former ones to receive armorial figures. The two shields first<br />

mentioned, have been, and are more frequently used than any other form <strong>of</strong><br />

shields.<br />

Besides these various forms <strong>of</strong> shields, we find them also frequently distinguished<br />

by their different positions ; some being carried erect, and others pendant, or<br />

hanging by the right or left upper corner : This the French call Escu Pendu, and<br />

the Italians, Scuto Pendente ; the reason given for it, is, that when tiltings and<br />

tournaments were proclaimed, they that were to joust in these military exercises,<br />

were obliged to hang up their shields <strong>of</strong> arms some days before the time <strong>of</strong> exer-<br />

, along<br />

the windows and balconies <strong>of</strong> the houses, near the place <strong>of</strong> action, and<br />

if in the field, upon trees, pavilions, or barriers <strong>of</strong> the place <strong>of</strong> jousting ; that they<br />

who were judges, or otherwise assisted in these noble exercises, might know the<br />

actors. Columbier says, " That they who wrere to fight on foot had their shields<br />

" hung by the right corner, and they on horseback by the left." This position<br />

<strong>of</strong> the shield is called pendant by some, and couche by others, and was very fre-<br />

quent all Europe over, from the eleventh century to the fourteenth. But all the<br />

shields couche or pendant that I have met with <strong>of</strong> the sons <strong>of</strong> the royal family <strong>of</strong><br />

Scotland and England, and <strong>of</strong> the nobility <strong>of</strong> these kingdoms, were pendant, or<br />

couche by the sinister, and very few by the dexter cornel- : The shield, pendant,<br />

or couche, when lying on the right side, was then a mark that the owner there<strong>of</strong><br />

had formerly been exercised in tournaments, into which none were admitted but<br />

those that were truly noble. And it "may not be improper here to<br />

no sovereign ever carried his shield pendant or couche i because,<br />

observe, that<br />

as soverei,.<br />

entered the lists <strong>of</strong> tournaments.<br />

they never formally

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!